2c:I[856015,["/_next/static/immutable/chunks/1xzisbplk9czp.js","/_next/static/immutable/chunks/3j2i1faptc_-9.js","/_next/static/immutable/chunks/1bqb83_yclja0.js","/_next/static/immutable/chunks/1on664om2hmh1.js","/_next/static/immutable/chunks/30t4sjq-27eg7.js","/_next/static/immutable/chunks/08tq8rmv423j5.js","/_next/static/immutable/chunks/32zk736rs0hqw.js","/_next/static/immutable/chunks/0lbgs964whs_0.js","/_next/static/immutable/chunks/1a_hqhrsle_n_.js","/_next/static/immutable/chunks/0hcnvyarhzl7i.js"],"default"] 2d:T5f58,

CATEGORY	DETAILS
RISK FACTORS	Young athletes (gymnastics, football, weightlifting) for isthmic type; women over 50 for degenerative type; family history of spinal anomalies for dysplastic type
ETIOLOGY	Isthmic: bilateral pars interarticularis defect (stress fracture). Degenerative: facet joint arthropathy and disc degeneration leading to segmental instability. Dysplastic: congenital malformation of the lumbosacral junction
PATIENT PRESENTATION	Chronic low back pain worsened by lumbar extension and physical activity; may report leg pain, numbness, or weakness radiating into the lower extremities
CLASSIC PHYSICAL EXAM	Palpable "step-off" at the affected spinous process; exaggerated lumbar lordosis; tight hamstrings; pain reproduced with standing lumbar hyperextension; neurological deficits in severe cases (L5 radiculopathy most common)
KEY DIAGNOSTIC RESULTS	Standing lateral lumbar X-ray showing anterior displacement of the vertebral body; oblique X-ray demonstrating the "Scotty dog with a collar" sign (pars defect); MRI showing degree of neural compression
MANAGEMENT	Conservative: activity modification, NSAIDs, flexion-based physical therapy, lumbosacral bracing. Surgical: posterolateral spinal fusion with or without decompression for high-grade slips, progressive neurological deficits, or failure of 6 months of conservative care
KEYWORDS	"Step-off" on palpation, hyperextension worsens pain, young athlete with back pain, Scotty dog sign, pars interarticularis defect, anterior vertebral slippage, neurogenic claudication in older adults

1. Pathophysiology

Spondylolisthesis refers to the anterior displacement (slippage) of one vertebral body relative to the vertebra immediately below it. The underlying mechanism differs depending on the subtype, but the clinical consequence is the same: structural instability of the spinal segment with potential narrowing of the spinal canal and neural foramina.

In isthmic spondylolisthesis, the process begins with spondylolysis, which is a stress fracture or defect of the pars interarticularis. The pars interarticularis is the thin bony bridge connecting the superior and inferior articular processes of a vertebra. When this structure is subjected to repetitive hyperextension and axial loading (as seen in gymnasts, football linemen, and cricket bowlers), microfractures accumulate and eventually produce a complete defect. When the pars defect is bilateral, the posterior arch loses its ability to anchor the vertebral body, allowing the superior vertebra to slide anteriorly over the one below. The most common level is L5 over S1, and the nerve root most frequently compressed is L5, producing weakness of ankle dorsiflexion and great toe extension, along with numbness over the dorsum of the foot.

In degenerative spondylolisthesis, there is no pars defect. Instead, long-standing facet joint arthropathy combined with intervertebral disc degeneration leads to segmental hypermobility and gradual forward subluxation. This type occurs predominantly at L4-L5 (because the L4-L5 facet joints are more sagittally oriented, permitting more translational motion) and is most common in women over 50 years of age. The intact but hypertrophied posterior elements buckle into the spinal canal, producing central canal stenosis and neurogenic claudication rather than isolated radiculopathy.

In dysplastic (congenital) spondylolisthesis, a congenital malformation of the upper sacral or lower lumbar facets fails to resist forward shearing forces, resulting in slippage during childhood growth spurts. These patients are at higher risk for high-grade progression and often present earlier in life.

The reason patients experience pain with lumbar extension is straightforward: extension further narrows the neural foramina and loads the posterior elements, compressing already compromised nerve roots. Conversely, flexion opens the foramina and provides relief, which is why flexion-based therapy is a cornerstone of conservative management.

2. Classification and Clinical Manifestation

Wiltse-Newman Classification (By Etiology)

TYPE	NAME	MECHANISM	TYPICAL PATIENT	TYPICAL LEVEL
I	Dysplastic (Congenital)	Congenital malformation of the lumbosacral facets	Children, adolescents	L5-S1
II	Isthmic	Pars interarticularis defect (stress fracture, elongation, or acute fracture)	Young athletes (10 to 25 years)	L5-S1
III	Degenerative	Facet arthropathy and disc degeneration causing segmental instability	Women over 50	L4-L5
IV	Traumatic	Acute fracture of posterior elements other than the pars	Any age, following trauma	Any level
V	Pathologic	Bone disease (tumor, infection, metabolic bone disease) weakening the posterior arch	Patients with known osseous pathology	Any level
VI	Iatrogenic (Post-surgical)	Excessive resection of posterior elements during surgery	Post-laminectomy patients	Surgical level

Meyerding Grading System (By Degree of Slip)

GRADE	PERCENTAGE OF ANTERIOR SLIP	CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE
I	0 to 25%	Most common; typically managed conservatively
II	25 to 50%	May be managed conservatively; closer monitoring required
III	50 to 75%	High-grade slip; often requires surgical intervention
IV	75 to 100%	High-grade slip; surgical management is standard
V (Spondyloptosis)	Greater than 100% (complete fall-off)	The vertebral body has completely displaced beyond the one below

Clinical Manifestation by Type

FEATURE	ISTHMIC	DEGENERATIVE
Age group	Adolescents and young adults	Adults over 50
Pain pattern	Axial low back pain, unilateral radiculopathy	Low back pain, bilateral neurogenic claudication
Neurological deficit	L5 radiculopathy (foot drop, dorsal foot numbness)	Cauda equina pattern in severe cases
Provocative maneuver	Hyperextension (single-leg hyperextension or "stork test")	Prolonged standing and walking
Relieving factor	Flexion and rest	Sitting, leaning forward (e.g., shopping cart sign)

3. Diagnostic Workup

TEST	ROLE	KEY FINDINGS
Standing lateral lumbar X-ray	Best initial test	Anterior displacement of the vertebral body; Meyerding grade measured on this view
Oblique lumbar X-ray	Identifies pars interarticularis defect	"Scotty dog with a collar" (lucency across the neck of the Scotty dog silhouette)
Flexion-extension lateral X-rays	Assesses dynamic instability	Translation of more than 4 mm or angular change of more than 10 degrees suggests instability
CT scan of the lumbar spine	Best for bony detail of pars defect	Clearly delineates the pars fracture line, helps surgical planning
MRI of the lumbar spine	Best for neural element assessment	Demonstrates degree of neural foraminal stenosis, central canal narrowing, disc pathology, and nerve root compression
SPECT bone scan (single-photon emission computed tomography)	Detects metabolically active pars stress reaction	Most sensitive test for early or occult pars stress fracture in a young athlete with normal plain radiographs

The workup begins with a standing lateral X-ray of the lumbar spine. The standing position is essential because it loads the spine and may reveal a slip that is not apparent on supine imaging. The degree of anterior slippage is measured on this view and graded using the Meyerding system. This is the best initial test.

If the lateral X-ray demonstrates slippage and you need to determine whether a pars defect is present (distinguishing isthmic from degenerative spondylolisthesis), an oblique X-ray is obtained. On the oblique view, the posterior elements form the silhouette of a "Scotty dog." In spondylolysis, a radiolucent line appears across the neck of the Scotty dog, described as a "collar." This finding confirms a pars interarticularis defect and points toward the isthmic subtype.

CT scan is the most accurate imaging modality for visualizing the bony architecture of the pars defect. It is especially useful for surgical planning and for equivocal X-ray findings.

MRI is ordered when there is clinical concern for radiculopathy, neurogenic claudication, or cauda equina syndrome. It provides direct visualization of the spinal cord, nerve roots, and intervertebral discs without radiation exposure and is the study of choice for evaluating neural compression.

In a young athlete presenting with back pain worsened by extension and normal plain radiographs, the next step is a SPECT bone scan or MRI with focused pars protocol. SPECT is the most sensitive test for detecting an early or stress-related pars injury before a frank fracture line is visible on X-ray or CT. This is a frequently tested scenario: the adolescent athlete with a clinical picture highly suggestive of spondylolysis but negative initial imaging.

4. Management and Treatment

CLINICAL SCENARIO	MANAGEMENT	DETAILS
Low-grade slip (Grade I or II), no neurological deficit	Conservative management	Activity modification, NSAIDs (ibuprofen 400 to 600 mg every 6 to 8 hours or naproxen 250 to 500 mg twice daily), flexion-based physical therapy program, thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO) brace for 6 to 12 weeks in acute spondylolysis
Acute spondylolysis in a young athlete	Rest, bracing, and rehabilitation	Cessation of aggravating sport, rigid TLSO brace for 8 to 12 weeks, followed by gradual return to activity with a flexion and core-stabilization exercise program
Low-grade slip with persistent symptoms after 6 months of conservative care	Surgical consultation	Posterolateral in-situ fusion at the affected level
High-grade slip (Grade III or above)	Surgical management	Posterior decompression with instrumented posterolateral fusion; reduction of the slip may be attempted in select cases but carries risk of L5 nerve root stretch injury
Progressive neurological deficit or cauda equina syndrome	Urgent surgical decompression and fusion	Wide decompression laminectomy with instrumented fusion; emergent if cauda equina syndrome is present (urinary retention, saddle anesthesia, bilateral leg weakness)
Degenerative spondylolisthesis with neurogenic claudication	Decompression and fusion	Laminectomy alone has a high rate of post-operative instability; the addition of fusion to decompression provides superior long-term outcomes (this is a well-tested principle)

Conservative management is the first-line approach for the majority of patients with Grade I and Grade II spondylolisthesis who do not have progressive neurological deficits. The cornerstone is a flexion-based physical therapy program that strengthens the core musculature (transverse abdominis, multifidus) and avoids extension-loading activities. NSAIDs are used for pain control. Epidural steroid injections may be considered for radicular symptoms that are refractory to oral medications and therapy.

For a young athlete with acute spondylolysis (the precursor lesion), the goal is to allow the pars defect to heal. This requires strict avoidance of the offending sport, use of a rigid TLSO brace for approximately 8 to 12 weeks, and a structured rehabilitation program. Healing rates for acute stress reactions detected early by SPECT or MRI are significantly better than for established non-unions. Return to sport is allowed only after the patient is pain-free with full range of motion and has completed a sport-readiness rehabilitation protocol.

Surgical indications include: (1) failure of at least 6 months of conservative therapy, (2) high-grade slippage (Grade III or higher), (3) progressive neurological deficit, and (4) cauda equina syndrome. The standard surgical procedure is posterolateral fusion, which stabilizes the affected segment. For degenerative spondylolisthesis, the landmark clinical evidence supports decompression combined with fusion over decompression alone, as isolated laminectomy in the setting of an unstable segment leads to further slippage and symptom recurrence.

A critical point for exam purposes: in degenerative spondylolisthesis with neurogenic claudication, decompression without fusion is insufficient because removing the posterior stabilizing structures from an already unstable segment accelerates progression. Always choose "decompression plus fusion" when this scenario is presented.

5. Differential Diagnosis and Distractors

DIFFERENTIAL	WHY IT IS SIMILAR	KEY DISCRIMINATOR
Spondylolysis (pars defect without slippage)	Same population (young athletes), same mechanism (hyperextension), same location (L5 pars interarticularis)	Spondylolysis has no anterior vertebral displacement on lateral X-ray; the pars defect is present but the vertebral body remains aligned
Lumbar disc herniation	Both cause radiculopathy with leg pain and numbness	Disc herniation pain is worsened by flexion, sitting, and Valsalva maneuver; spondylolisthesis pain is worsened by extension. MRI will show a posterolateral disc extrusion rather than bony slippage
Lumbar spinal stenosis (without spondylolisthesis)	Degenerative spondylolisthesis and primary stenosis both cause neurogenic claudication in older adults	Primary stenosis shows canal narrowing from ligamentum flavum hypertrophy and facet overgrowth but no vertebral translation on lateral X-ray
Ankylosing spondylitis	Both present with chronic back pain in younger patients	Ankylosing spondylitis pain improves with activity and worsens with rest (inflammatory pattern); sacroiliac joint involvement and positive HLA-B27 distinguish it clearly
Vertebral compression fracture	Both may show vertebral body deformity on X-ray	Compression fractures show loss of vertebral body height (wedging) without forward translation of the intact vertebral body over the one below; history of osteoporosis or trauma is typical
Sacroiliac joint dysfunction	Both cause low back pain that may radiate to the buttock and posterior thigh	Pain is localized to the sacroiliac joint region, provoked by FABER and compression tests, with no neurological deficits; imaging of the lumbar spine is normal

6. Traps and High-Yield Pearls

The most common trap on this topic is confusing spondylolysis with spondylolisthesis. Many students use these terms interchangeably, but they describe two distinct entities. Spondylolysis is the pars defect alone; spondylolisthesis is the resulting forward slippage of the vertebral body. A vignette may describe a young athlete with extension-related back pain and a Scotty dog collar sign on oblique X-ray but a normal lateral X-ray with no slippage. The correct answer here is spondylolysis, not spondylolisthesis.

Another frequent error is selecting the wrong provocative mechanism. Test-writers will present a young patient with back pain and leg symptoms and include answer choices for both disc herniation and spondylolisthesis. The discriminating detail is direction of provocation: extension worsens spondylolisthesis, flexion and sitting worsen disc herniation. Students who do not pay attention to this detail in the vignette will pick the wrong diagnosis.

A third common mistake involves the young athlete with back pain and normal X-rays. Students often stop the workup here and select "musculoskeletal strain." The correct next step is advanced imaging: a SPECT bone scan or MRI with pars protocol to evaluate for an occult stress reaction. This is a high-yield concept because it tests your ability to pursue a workup when the clinical suspicion remains high despite negative initial imaging.

Finally, in the management of degenerative spondylolisthesis with neurogenic claudication, always remember that decompression alone is not sufficient. The tested principle is that fusion must accompany decompression to prevent post-operative progression of slippage. When a question asks for the best surgical approach in this scenario, "laminectomy with posterolateral fusion" is the correct answer over "laminectomy alone."

The core competency being tested across all spondylolisthesis questions is your ability to correctly classify the subtype based on patient demographics and imaging, sequence the imaging workup appropriately (X-ray first, then CT or MRI or SPECT based on the clinical question), and match the management to the grade and clinical severity.

1d:["$","$L2c",null,{"article":{"id":"063bb6bb-d647-45de-9ddd-a1f5dcc57479","title":"Spondilolistesis","content":"$2d","category":"Muskuloskeletal","created_at":"2026-09-06T04:30:51.325748+00:00","status":"published","subcategory":null},"questionCount":0,"sections":[{"id":"section-pathophysiology","num":"01","title":"Pathophysiology"},{"id":"section-classification-and-clinical-manifestation","num":"02","title":"Classification and Clinical Manifestation"},{"id":"section-diagnostic-workup","num":"03","title":"Diagnostic Workup"},{"id":"section-management-and-treatment","num":"04","title":"Management and Treatment"},{"id":"section-differential-diagnosis-and-distractors","num":"05","title":"Differential Diagnosis and Distractors"},{"id":"section-traps-and-high-yield-pearls","num":"06","title":"Traps and High-Yield Pearls"}],"hasSummaryTable":true}]