2c:I[856015,["/_next/static/immutable/chunks/1xzisbplk9czp.js","/_next/static/immutable/chunks/3j2i1faptc_-9.js","/_next/static/immutable/chunks/1bqb83_yclja0.js","/_next/static/immutable/chunks/1on664om2hmh1.js","/_next/static/immutable/chunks/30t4sjq-27eg7.js","/_next/static/immutable/chunks/08tq8rmv423j5.js","/_next/static/immutable/chunks/32zk736rs0hqw.js","/_next/static/immutable/chunks/0lbgs964whs_0.js","/_next/static/immutable/chunks/1a_hqhrsle_n_.js","/_next/static/immutable/chunks/0hcnvyarhzl7i.js"],"default"] 2d:T517e,

CATEGORY	DETAILS
RISK FACTORS	Adolescents and young adults (ages 10-19), athletes in sports requiring repetitive lumbar hyperextension and rotation (gymnastics, football linemen, cricket bowlers, weightlifters, dancers, wrestlers), male predominance (~2:1), family history suggesting genetic predisposition to thin pars interarticularis
ETIOLOGY	Stress fracture (fatigue fracture) of the pars interarticularis, most commonly at the L5 vertebra; results from repetitive microtrauma rather than a single acute event
PATIENT PRESENTATION	Insidious onset of low back pain in an adolescent athlete, worsened by hyperextension and activity, improved with rest; pain may radiate to the buttocks but rarely below the knee
CLASSIC PHYSICAL EXAM	Pain reproduced on lumbar hyperextension (the single-leg hyperextension test, also called the Stork test); paraspinal muscle spasm; hamstring tightness; no neurological deficits in isolated spondylolysis
KEY DIAGNOSTIC RESULTS	Lateral lumbar X-ray may show a lucency or defect at the pars interarticularis ("Scotty dog with a collar" or "broken neck" on oblique view); MRI is the preferred advanced imaging to detect early stress reactions before a frank fracture line appears; bone scan (SPECT) detects active lesions
MANAGEMENT	Activity modification and rest from aggravating sports for 3 to 6 months; rigid or semi-rigid thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO brace); physical therapy focusing on core stabilization and hamstring stretching; surgical repair (direct pars repair or posterolateral fusion) reserved for refractory cases after 6+ months of conservative treatment
KEYWORDS	"Adolescent athlete with low back pain," "pain with hyperextension," "Scotty dog sign," "pars interarticularis defect," "Stork test positive," "L5 stress fracture"

1. Pathophysiology

The pars interarticularis is the thin bony bridge connecting the superior and inferior articular processes of a vertebra. This region is the weakest structural point of the posterior vertebral arch and is subjected to considerable shear and compressive forces during lumbar hyperextension and axial loading. In adolescents, the pars is still undergoing ossification, making it inherently more vulnerable to repetitive stress.

When an athlete repeatedly hyperextends and rotates the lumbar spine, cumulative microtrauma exceeds the bone's capacity for repair, producing a stress reaction in the pars. If the mechanical insult continues without adequate rest, this progresses to a complete stress fracture (spondylolysis). The L5 vertebra is affected in approximately 85-95% of cases because L5 sits at the lumbosacral junction where the lordotic curvature concentrates the greatest mechanical stress.

This mechanism explains the clinical presentation directly. Pain is triggered by hyperextension because that movement loads the posterior elements and opens the fracture site. The pain is activity-related and relieved by rest because the pathology is mechanical. There is typically no radiculopathy or neurological deficit in isolated spondylolysis because the defect alone does not compromise the spinal canal or neural foramen. Neurological symptoms should prompt you to consider progression to spondylolisthesis (anterior slippage of the vertebral body through the bilateral pars defects), which is a related but distinct diagnosis.

A genetic predisposition exists: some individuals have a congenitally thinner or dysplastic pars interarticularis, which lowers the threshold for fracture. This is why family history and certain ethnic groups (e.g., Inuit populations with prevalence up to 40%) carry higher risk.

2. Classification and Clinical Manifestation

Spondylolysis is classified by the stage of the bony lesion and the laterality of the defect.

CLASSIFICATION	DESCRIPTION	CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Stress reaction (early/pre-spondylolysis)	Bone marrow edema at the pars without a visible fracture line	Detected on MRI only; highest healing potential with conservative treatment
Active (acute) spondylolysis	Frank fracture line through the pars, with surrounding edema indicating ongoing remodeling	Visible on CT; still amenable to brace treatment; SPECT scan is positive
Chronic/terminal spondylolysis	Established nonunion of the pars defect with sclerotic margins, no surrounding edema	Fracture will not heal; management focuses on symptom control and functional rehabilitation
Unilateral defect	Pars defect on one side only	Lower risk of progression to spondylolisthesis; generally stable
Bilateral defect	Pars defects on both sides	Structurally unstable; risk of vertebral slippage (spondylolisthesis); requires closer monitoring

Clinical manifestations by stage:

FEATURE	EARLY STRESS REACTION	ACUTE FRACTURE	CHRONIC NONUNION
Pain pattern	Intermittent, activity-related	Persistent with activity	Variable; may be asymptomatic or chronically symptomatic
Hyperextension test	Positive	Strongly positive	May or may not reproduce pain
Neurological exam	Normal	Normal	Normal (unless spondylolisthesis develops)
Healing potential	Excellent with rest	Good with bracing (60-80%)	Poor; bony union unlikely

3. Diagnostic Workup

TEST	ROLE	KEY FINDINGS
AP and lateral lumbar X-rays	Best initial test	May show pars defect on lateral view; oblique views show the classic "Scotty dog with a broken neck/collar" sign; however, sensitivity is limited (33%) for early lesions
MRI (without contrast)	Preferred advanced imaging for early detection	Detects bone marrow edema (stress reaction) before a fracture line develops; avoids radiation in young patients; also rules out disc pathology and other causes of back pain
CT scan (thin-cut axial with sagittal reconstruction)	Most accurate test for confirming the fracture line	Best spatial resolution for bony anatomy; clearly delineates the pars defect and determines if the fracture is acute (irregular margins) vs. chronic (sclerotic, smooth margins)
SPECT bone scan (Single Photon Emission CT)	Identifies metabolically active lesions	Increased uptake at the pars indicates active bone turnover and healing potential; a "cold" or negative SPECT with a visible defect on CT suggests chronic nonunion unlikely to heal

Best Initial Test: Standing AP and lateral X-rays of the lumbar spine. These are the first-line study when an adolescent athlete presents with activity-related low back pain and a positive hyperextension test. However, you must recognize that plain films have low sensitivity for early stress reactions. A normal X-ray does not rule out spondylolysis.

When X-rays are negative but clinical suspicion remains high (positive Stork test, adolescent athlete, hyperextension-related pain), the next step is MRI of the lumbar spine. MRI is now favored over bone scan as the second-line study because it avoids ionizing radiation, detects early stress reactions as pars edema on STIR/T2-weighted sequences, and simultaneously evaluates for alternative diagnoses (disc herniation, infection, tumor).

Most Accurate/Confirmatory Test: A thin-cut CT scan provides the definitive anatomical detail of the pars defect. It is used when you need to confirm a fracture, assess chronicity (acute vs. sclerotic nonunion), or plan for surgery. CT combined with SPECT ("SPECT-CT") can simultaneously confirm the defect and determine whether it is metabolically active, which directly guides treatment decisions.

The workup order that exam questions typically test: X-ray first, then MRI if X-ray is negative but suspicion is high, then CT or SPECT-CT if further characterization of the defect is needed.

4. Management and Treatment

CLINICAL SCENARIO	MANAGEMENT	DETAILS
Acute/active spondylolysis (early stress reaction or acute fracture)	Activity modification + bracing + physical therapy	Cessation of aggravating sport for 3 to 6 months; TLSO or Boston overlap brace worn for approximately 3 months (some protocols use 23 hours/day initially, then weaning); NSAIDs for pain (ibuprofen 400-600 mg every 6-8 hours as needed); physical therapy initiated once pain decreases
Symptomatic chronic spondylolysis (nonunion)	Physical therapy + activity modification	Brace is generally not used because bony healing is not expected; focus on core stabilization, hamstring flexibility, and pain management; epidural steroid injection may be considered for refractory pain
Failure of conservative treatment (6+ months)	Surgical intervention	Direct pars repair (Buck's technique with screw fixation, or Scott wiring) for unilateral or bilateral defects without spondylolisthesis; posterolateral fusion (L5-S1) if there is associated spondylolisthesis or if the disc is degenerated
Bilateral pars defect with progressive spondylolisthesis	Surgical fusion	In-situ posterolateral fusion for low-grade slips (Meyerding Grade I-II); reduction and instrumented fusion considered for higher grades

Acute Stabilization: The cornerstone of initial management is rest from the offending activity. The athlete must stop the sport causing repetitive hyperextension. A rigid or semi-rigid TLSO brace (such as a Boston overlap brace) is prescribed for approximately 12 weeks to limit lumbar motion and promote healing. The goal of bracing is to reduce mechanical stress across the pars to allow bony union. During this period, the patient can maintain cardiovascular fitness with non-impact activities (e.g., stationary cycling, swimming without flip turns) as tolerated.

Pain management during the acute phase uses NSAIDs (ibuprofen 400-600 mg PO every 6-8 hours, or naproxen 250-500 mg PO twice daily), with acetaminophen as an adjunct. There is some debate about whether NSAIDs impair bone healing, but short-term use for symptom control is generally accepted.

Physical therapy is the critical component of long-term management and begins once pain allows. The program emphasizes lumbar stabilization exercises (strengthening transverse abdominis, multifidus, and gluteal muscles), hamstring and hip flexor stretching (tight hamstrings increase pelvic tilt and lumbar lordosis, worsening pars stress), and sport-specific rehabilitation before return to play. Return to sport is permitted when the athlete is pain-free with full range of motion, has completed a rehabilitation program, and can perform sport activities without symptoms, typically at 4 to 6 months.

Surgical treatment is reserved for the minority of patients (approximately 10-15%) who fail 6 or more months of conservative management. Direct pars repair is preferred in younger patients with a unilateral or bilateral defect but no significant disc degeneration or spondylolisthesis, because it preserves the motion segment. If the defect is chronic with disc changes, or if spondylolisthesis is present, posterolateral spinal fusion (typically L5-S1) is the procedure of choice.

Contraindications and considerations: In patients with known NSAID allergies or renal impairment, substitute acetaminophen for analgesia. Bracing is generally well-tolerated, but compliance can be challenging in adolescents; patient education is key.

5. Differential Diagnosis and Distractors

DIFFERENTIAL	WHY IT IS SIMILAR	KEY DISCRIMINATOR
Spondylolisthesis	Both involve the pars interarticularis; spondylolisthesis is a direct complication of bilateral spondylolysis	Spondylolisthesis involves anterior slippage of one vertebral body on another, visible on lateral X-ray; spondylolysis is the pars defect alone without translation; a "step-off" on palpation and neurological deficits (if high grade) suggest listhesis
Lumbar disc herniation	Both cause low back pain in young patients and can occur in athletes	Disc herniation causes radiculopathy (dermatomal pain radiating below the knee, positive straight-leg raise, motor/sensory deficits); spondylolysis pain is axial, worsened by extension (not flexion), and neurologically normal
Muscle strain / lumbar sprain	Both present as activity-related low back pain in athletes	Muscle strain improves within 2 to 4 weeks with rest; there is no bony tenderness at the midline, and the hyperextension/Stork test is negative; pain is diffuse and related to flexion/rotation rather than extension
Scheuermann disease	Both present as back pain in adolescents	Scheuermann disease involves the thoracic or thoracolumbar spine (not lumbar), produces a rigid kyphosis, and imaging shows vertebral endplate irregularity with anterior wedging of 3 or more consecutive vertebrae by 5 degrees or more
Ankylosing spondylitis	Both cause back pain in young patients	Ankylosing spondylitis presents with morning stiffness that improves with exercise, onset in the 20s-30s, involves the sacroiliac joints on imaging, and is associated with HLA-B27 positivity; pain is inflammatory (worse at rest), not mechanical
Spinal tumor (osteoid osteoma)	Both can cause focal bony pain in adolescents	Osteoid osteoma causes night pain dramatically relieved by NSAIDs; CT shows a small nidus with surrounding sclerosis; location is typically in the posterior elements but not limited to the pars

6. Traps and High-Yield Pearls

The most common way students get questions about spondylolysis wrong is by confusing it with spondylolisthesis or lumbar disc herniation. A vignette describing an adolescent athlete with extension-related low back pain, a normal neurological exam, and a positive Stork test is spondylolysis until proven otherwise. If the question stem adds radiculopathy, a step-off on palpation, or anterior vertebral slippage on imaging, you are now dealing with spondylolisthesis, not isolated spondylolysis.

Another frequent trap involves the diagnostic workup sequence. Students often jump to CT scan as the next step after negative X-rays, but the tested answer in a young patient is MRI first (to avoid radiation and to detect early stress reactions). CT is the most accurate test for confirming the fracture line, but it is not the next best step after a negative plain film when MRI is available. The tested logic: X-ray is the initial test, MRI is the next step when suspicion persists, and CT is for surgical planning or detailed fracture characterization.

A third trap is management: students may recommend immediate surgical referral for any pars defect. The tested principle is that conservative management succeeds in the large majority of cases (up to 85-90%), and surgery is only indicated after failure of 6 or more months of bracing, rehabilitation, and activity modification. The core competency being tested is the ability to recognize a classic presentation of a mechanical posterior element stress injury in a young athlete, order the correct imaging in the right sequence, and understand that this is overwhelmingly a nonsurgical diagnosis.

1d:["$","$L2c",null,{"article":{"id":"260d747a-91bc-4598-8a2c-808844b2c5c6","title":"Spondilolisis","content":"$2d","category":"Muskuloskeletal","created_at":"2026-09-06T04:43:30.640928+00:00","status":"published","subcategory":null},"questionCount":0,"sections":[{"id":"section-pathophysiology","num":"01","title":"Pathophysiology"},{"id":"section-classification-and-clinical-manifestation","num":"02","title":"Classification and Clinical Manifestation"},{"id":"section-diagnostic-workup","num":"03","title":"Diagnostic Workup"},{"id":"section-management-and-treatment","num":"04","title":"Management and Treatment"},{"id":"section-differential-diagnosis-and-distractors","num":"05","title":"Differential Diagnosis and Distractors"},{"id":"section-traps-and-high-yield-pearls","num":"06","title":"Traps and High-Yield Pearls"}],"hasSummaryTable":true}]