2d:I[856015,["/_next/static/immutable/chunks/1xzisbplk9czp.js","/_next/static/immutable/chunks/3j2i1faptc_-9.js","/_next/static/immutable/chunks/0fma7nlq6immz.js","/_next/static/immutable/chunks/08tq8rmv423j5.js","/_next/static/immutable/chunks/1chr5wkk3j58k.js","/_next/static/immutable/chunks/37kmmh_zm4dov.js","/_next/static/immutable/chunks/311zvdjfxff-f.js","/_next/static/immutable/chunks/1a_hqhrsle_n_.js"],"default"] 2e:T4667,

Summary Table

Category	Details
Risk Factors	Children aged 2-8 years (most common), psychiatric patients, intellectually disabled individuals, hearing aid users (retained batteries)
Etiology	Insertion of objects into the external auditory canal (EAC): beads, toys, food (beans, seeds), insects, button batteries, cotton tip fragments
Patient Presentation	Ear pain (otalgia), sensation of fullness or pressure, hearing loss (conductive), otorrhea if secondary infection develops; may be asymptomatic and discovered incidentally
Classic Physical Exam	Object visualized on otoscopy within the EAC; surrounding canal may show erythema, edema, or granulation tissue if longstanding; TM may be obscured or injured
Key Diagnostic Results	Direct visualization via otoscopy is both the initial and confirmatory step; CT temporal bone only if deep impaction, suspected TM perforation, or complications
Management	Removal technique selected based on object type and location: irrigation, suction, alligator forceps, or right-angle hook; button batteries and live insects require emergent removal
Keywords	"Child with ear pain," "buzzing sensation in the ear," "object in the ear canal," "button battery in ear," "otoscopy reveals..."

1. Pathophysiology

The external auditory canal is a blind-ending tube approximately 2.5 cm in length in adults, with a lateral cartilaginous portion and a medial bony portion. The canal narrows at the isthmus, the junction between these two segments. Foreign bodies tend to lodge at or medial to this isthmus, which is why deeper objects are harder to retrieve and carry higher risk of complications.

When a foreign body sits in the canal, it causes mechanical obstruction. This produces conductive hearing loss by preventing sound wave transmission to the tympanic membrane (TM). Prolonged contact with the canal wall leads to local mucosal irritation, causing pain, edema, and eventually secondary otitis externa with purulent discharge. This is why a child presenting with unilateral foul-smelling otorrhea that does not respond to standard otic antibiotic drops should raise suspicion for a retained foreign body.

Hygroscopic organic materials (beans, seeds, sponge) deserve special attention because they absorb moisture from the canal and swell over time, making delayed removal progressively more difficult and painful. This is also why irrigation is contraindicated for organic foreign bodies, as the water causes further expansion.

Button batteries represent a true emergency. When a battery contacts the moist canal mucosa, it creates a low-voltage circuit that generates sodium hydroxide (alkaline burns) through electrolysis. This can cause liquefactive necrosis of the canal skin and even erode into deeper structures within hours. The mechanism is the same as esophageal button battery injury: tissue destruction occurs from the alkaline external discharge, not from acid leakage.

Live insects cause intense distress due to movement and buzzing against the TM. The first step is to immobilize the insect by instilling mineral oil, lidocaine, or alcohol into the canal before attempting removal, because a live insect will move deeper and cause TM injury if grasped directly.

2. Classification and Clinical Manifestation

Category	Examples	Clinical Features	Key Concern
Inorganic, non-battery	Beads, plastic toys, stones, erasers	Ear fullness, mild pain, conductive hearing loss; may be asymptomatic	Generally non-urgent; standard removal techniques
Organic	Beans, seeds, insects (dead), food particles, cotton	Swelling over time, secondary infection, foul discharge	Irrigation contraindicated (swelling risk); prone to secondary otitis externa
Live insects	Cockroaches, flies, moths, ants	Intense pain, buzzing/crawling sensation, patient highly distressed, possible bloody otorrhea	Must immobilize with mineral oil or lidocaine before extraction
Button batteries	Disc/coin-cell batteries	Pain, rapidly progressive tissue necrosis, dark or bloody discharge	Emergent removal required; no irrigation; can cause liquefactive necrosis within 1-2 hours
Impacted cerumen	Wax accumulation	Progressive hearing loss, fullness, tinnitus	Common in hearing aid users and elderly; softening agents (cerumenolytics) before removal

3. Diagnostic Workup

Test	Role	When to Use
Otoscopy	Best initial test AND confirmatory in most cases	All suspected ear foreign bodies
Pneumatic otoscopy	Assess TM mobility if perforation suspected	After foreign body removal if hearing loss persists
CT temporal bone	Evaluate for deep impaction, TM perforation, ossicular disruption, or intracranial extension	Failed removal attempts, suspected complications, button battery with uncertain depth
Audiometry	Assess conductive vs. sensorineural hearing loss	Persistent hearing deficit after removal

Otoscopy is the cornerstone. In most cases, the diagnosis is made and confirmed in the same step by directly visualizing the object within the canal. No imaging is needed if the object is clearly seen and the TM is intact.

Imaging becomes necessary when the object cannot be visualized (deep impaction or significant canal edema obscuring the view), when there is concern for TM perforation (sudden onset of vertigo, sensorineural hearing loss, or bloody otorrhea after manipulation), or when a button battery has been present for an uncertain duration and you need to assess the extent of tissue damage.

A key clinical point: if the patient presents with unilateral conductive hearing loss, foul-smelling discharge, and failed treatment for otitis externa, always re-examine with good visualization. A retained foreign body is a classic cause of "treatment-resistant" unilateral otitis externa in children.

4. Management and Treatment

Scenario	Technique	Details
Smooth, round object (bead, stone)	Right-angle hook or curette passed behind the object	Pull toward the operator; forceps tend to push round objects deeper
Irregular/graspable object	Alligator or Hartmann forceps	Grasp and withdraw; works well for cotton, paper, insects
Non-organic, non-battery	Irrigation with body-temperature water	Contraindicated if TM perforation suspected or organic material
Live insect	Mineral oil or 2% lidocaine instillation to kill/immobilize, then forceps or suction	Always immobilize first; never attempt blind grasping of a live insect
Button battery	Emergent removal with forceps or suction under direct visualization	No irrigation (worsens electrolysis); no delays; refer to ENT immediately if not removable
Organic / hygroscopic	Suction tip or right-angle hook; avoid irrigation	Water causes swelling and makes removal harder
Failed primary removal / uncooperative child	Referral to ENT for removal under sedation or general anesthesia	Consider after 1-2 failed attempts to avoid canal trauma

Step-by-Step Management Logic

Step 1: Assess urgency. Button batteries and live insects are the two scenarios requiring immediate action. Everything else can be approached in a controlled, elective manner.

Step 2: Choose the technique based on object characteristics. The most commonly tested principle is that round, smooth objects should not be grasped with forceps because the instrument tends to push them medially toward the TM. Instead, a right-angle hook or ear curette is passed lateral to the object and then pulled outward. Irregular objects with edges that can be grasped are appropriate for alligator forceps.

Step 3: Irrigation considerations. Irrigation with warm (body-temperature) water using a syringe is effective for small, non-organic debris and cerumen. It is contraindicated in three situations: (1) suspected TM perforation, (2) organic foreign bodies, and (3) button batteries. Using cold or hot water can cause caloric-induced vertigo and nystagmus, so always use water at body temperature.

Step 4: Post-removal care. After removal, perform otoscopy again to confirm the canal is clear and the TM is intact. If there is canal abrasion or secondary infection, prescribe otic antibiotic drops (e.g., ofloxacin otic or ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone drops) for 5-7 days. If TM perforation is identified, use non-ototoxic drops (fluoroquinolone-based) and refer to ENT for follow-up.

Step 5: Know when to stop. If the first or second attempt at removal fails, or the patient (especially a child) is uncooperative, stop and refer to ENT. Repeated blind attempts cause canal edema, bleeding, and can convert a simple foreign body into a complicated one requiring anesthesia.

5. Differential Diagnosis and Distractors

Differential Diagnosis	Why It Is Similar	Key Discriminator
Otitis externa	Ear pain, discharge, canal edema	Otitis externa is diffuse canal inflammation with tragal tenderness; foreign body shows a discrete object on otoscopy and may be unilateral with no antecedent water exposure
Acute otitis media (AOM)	Ear pain, possible hearing loss, child age group	AOM has a bulging, erythematous TM with middle ear effusion; foreign body shows a normal or obscured TM with object in the canal
Cholesteatoma	Foul-smelling otorrhea, conductive hearing loss	Cholesteatoma shows pearly white mass in the pars flaccida or posterosuperior quadrant with TM retraction; long history; foreign body is acute onset
Cerumen impaction	Conductive hearing loss, ear fullness, visualized on otoscopy	Cerumen is waxy brown material; foreign body is a discrete non-wax object; cerumen softens with cerumenolytics
Insect bite reaction (external ear)	Pain, edema, distress	Bite is on the pinna or outer canal with localized swelling; foreign body (live insect) causes buzzing sensation and insect is visualized inside the canal
Referred otalgia (dental, TMJ)	Ear pain without obvious otologic findings	Normal otoscopy; pain reproduced by jaw movement or dental percussion; no foreign body seen

6. Traps and High-Yield Pearls

The most common way students lose points on this topic is by selecting irrigation as the removal method for every foreign body type. Irrigation is a reasonable technique for many inorganic objects, but choosing it for organic/hygroscopic material, button batteries, or in the setting of a perforated TM is a classic wrong answer on the exam.

The second major trap involves button batteries. A vignette describing a child with rapidly worsening ear pain and dark or bloody discharge after placing a "small disc" in the ear canal is testing whether you recognize the urgency. The correct answer is always emergent removal, not observation, not irrigation, not topical antibiotics. Any delay risks permanent canal stenosis or deeper structural damage.

For live insects, the tested concept is sequence: immobilize first, then remove. Jumping directly to forceps extraction is wrong because the insect will burrow deeper and potentially perforate the TM.

Finally, remember the "rule of attempts": if you cannot remove the object after one or two careful tries, the next best step is ENT referral, not continued attempts. The vignette may describe a child who is crying and uncooperative after a failed attempt, and the tested answer is procedural sedation or referral, not "try again with a different instrument."

The core competency being tested across all ear foreign body questions is matching the correct removal technique to the object type and recognizing the two emergencies (button battery and live insect) that change the standard approach.

1e:["$","$L2d",null,{"article":{"id":"5a7cd1c1-8bb1-430e-b233-09d280c4c925","title":"Benda Asing Telinga","content":"$2e","category":"THT-KL","created_at":"2026-05-13T16:23:40.657318+00:00","status":"published","subcategory":null},"questionCount":4,"sections":[{"id":"section-pathophysiology","num":"01","title":"Pathophysiology"},{"id":"section-classification-and-clinical-manifestation","num":"02","title":"Classification and Clinical Manifestation"},{"id":"section-diagnostic-workup","num":"03","title":"Diagnostic Workup"},{"id":"section-management-and-treatment","num":"04","title":"Management and Treatment"},{"id":"section-differential-diagnosis-and-distractors","num":"05","title":"Differential Diagnosis and Distractors"},{"id":"section-traps-and-high-yield-pearls","num":"06","title":"Traps and High-Yield Pearls"}],"hasSummaryTable":true}]