2d:I[856015,["/_next/static/immutable/chunks/1xzisbplk9czp.js","/_next/static/immutable/chunks/3j2i1faptc_-9.js","/_next/static/immutable/chunks/0fma7nlq6immz.js","/_next/static/immutable/chunks/08tq8rmv423j5.js","/_next/static/immutable/chunks/1chr5wkk3j58k.js","/_next/static/immutable/chunks/37kmmh_zm4dov.js","/_next/static/immutable/chunks/311zvdjfxff-f.js","/_next/static/immutable/chunks/1a_hqhrsle_n_.js"],"default"] 2e:T5806,

Summary Table

Category	High-Yield Findings
Risk Factors	Male sex (X-linked red-green type); positive family history (often maternal uncle or grandfather); chronic use of ethambutol, hydroxychloroquine, digoxin, or sildenafil; diabetes mellitus, glaucoma, optic neuritis, multiple sclerosis; advancing age
Etiology	Congenital: X-linked recessive mutation in OPN1LW (L-cone, red) or OPN1MW (M-cone, green) on Xq28; autosomal recessive OPN1SW (S-cone, blue) on chromosome 7. Acquired: retinal disease, optic nerve disease, drug toxicity
Patient Presentation	School-aged boy who confuses red and green crayons; child failing classroom color screening; adult flagged during occupational screening for pilot, electrician, military, or transportation roles; asymptomatic until tested
Classic Physical Exam	Normal visual acuity, normal pupillary response, normal fundoscopy in congenital cases; failure to read Ishihara pseudoisochromatic plates; otherwise unremarkable ophthalmologic examination
Key Diagnostic Results	Ishihara plates: cannot identify embedded numerals in red-green confusion patterns. Farnsworth-Munsell 100 hue test: misordering of color caps. Anomaloscope: abnormal Rayleigh match (red + green to match yellow)
Management	Genetic counseling and reassurance; vocational guidance; treat or remove the offending agent in acquired cases; chromatic filter lenses offer limited symptomatic benefit; no curative therapy for congenital forms
Keywords	"Cannot tell red from green," "failed school vision screening but acuity 20/20," "maternal uncle with same problem," "wants to be a pilot," "Ishihara plates," "deuteranomaly"

1. Pathophysiology

Color vision is a function of the three cone photoreceptor classes in the retina, each containing a distinct opsin photopigment. L-cones absorb maximally near 564 nm (perceived as red), M-cones near 533 nm (green), and S-cones near 437 nm (blue). The brain compares relative activation across these three populations to construct color perception. When one cone class is missing (-opia) or functionally shifted (-omaly), the wavelength comparisons collapse and the patient confuses colors that lie along the affected axis.

The OPN1LW and OPN1MW genes sit adjacent to each other on the long arm of the X chromosome (Xq28). Because these two genes share over 96% sequence homology, unequal crossing over during meiosis frequently produces hybrid genes, deletions, or inactivating mutations. This explains why red-green color blindness follows an X-linked recessive pattern, affecting roughly 8% of males but only 0.5% of females. A classic vignette clue is an affected boy whose maternal grandfather or uncle had the same problem, since the carrier mother passes the abnormal X. The OPN1SW gene for blue cones is autosomal on chromosome 7, so isolated blue-yellow deficiency is rare and shows autosomal dominant inheritance.

In acquired color vision deficiency, damage to retinal or neural pathways selectively impairs color discrimination. Köllner's rule is a high-yield concept: outer retinal disease (such as age-related macular degeneration or central serous chorioretinopathy) tends to produce blue-yellow defects, whereas optic nerve disease (such as optic neuritis in multiple sclerosis or toxic optic neuropathy from ethambutol) tends to produce red-green defects. Glaucoma is the classic exception, often producing blue-yellow loss despite being a neural disease. Loss of red-green discrimination on a recently started ethambutol regimen is a near-pathognomonic test cue for early ocular toxicity, prompting drug discontinuation before vision loss progresses.

2. Classification of Clinical Manifestations

Type	Affected Cone	Inheritance	Color Confusion	Frequency in Males
Protanopia	L-cone absent	X-linked recessive	Red appears dark or black; reds and greens confused	~1%
Protanomaly	L-cone shifted	X-linked recessive	Mild red-green confusion, reds appear duller	~1%
Deuteranopia	M-cone absent	X-linked recessive	Green-red confusion without darkening of red	~1%
Deuteranomaly	M-cone shifted	X-linked recessive	Mildest and most common form, subtle green-red confusion	~5% (most common congenital type)
Tritanopia	S-cone absent	Autosomal dominant	Blue-yellow confusion	Very rare
Tritanomaly	S-cone shifted	Autosomal dominant	Mild blue-yellow confusion	Very rare
Rod monochromacy (achromatopsia)	All cones nonfunctional	Autosomal recessive	Complete absence of color vision plus photophobia, nystagmus, poor acuity	Very rare
Cone monochromacy	Two cone classes nonfunctional	X-linked or autosomal	No color discrimination but acuity preserved	Very rare

A useful framework: anopia means the cone class is absent (dichromacy, more severe), while anomaly means the cone is present but shifted (anomalous trichromacy, milder). Deuteranomaly is the single most common congenital color vision deficiency worldwide and is the typical answer in a vignette describing a boy with mild red-green confusion.

3. Diagnostic Workup

Test	Purpose	Role
Ishihara pseudoisochromatic plates	Detect red-green deficiency	Best initial / screening test
Hardy-Rand-Rittler (HRR) plates	Detect red-green and blue-yellow defects with severity grading	Screening when blue-yellow involvement suspected
Farnsworth-Munsell 100 hue test	Quantify severity, classify axis of defect	Detailed clinical assessment, occupational testing
Farnsworth D-15 panel	Rapid version of hue test	Field screening, distinguishes severe deficiency
Anomaloscope (Nagel)	Rayleigh match: patient adjusts red and green to match a yellow standard	Most accurate / confirmatory (gold standard) for red-green deficiency
Electroretinography (ERG)	Cone function in suspected acquired or syndromic disease	Used in achromatopsia or retinal dystrophy workup
Fundoscopy and OCT	Identify acquired retinal cause	Used when acquired cause suspected

The workup begins with Ishihara plates as the best initial test because they are inexpensive, rapid, and highly sensitive for red-green deficiency, which accounts for the great majority of cases. The patient is asked to identify numerals embedded in dot patterns where the figure and background differ only in hue along the red-green axis. An individual with normal color vision sees the number; a deuteranope or protanope cannot distinguish it. Note that Ishihara plates are insensitive for blue-yellow defects, so HRR plates are preferred when tritan deficiency or acquired retinal disease is on the differential.

The anomaloscope is the most accurate confirmatory test and is considered the gold standard for red-green deficiency. The patient adjusts the proportion of red and green light to match a fixed yellow reference (the Rayleigh match). Protanopes accept matches with excessive red, while deuteranopes accept matches with excessive green, allowing precise classification. The Farnsworth-Munsell 100 hue test is used when grading severity matters, for example in occupational fitness assessments for pilots, mariners, or electricians; the patient arranges colored caps in chromatic order, and errors cluster along the deficient axis.

When the history suggests an acquired etiology (sudden onset, monocular involvement, associated visual loss, exposure to ethambutol or hydroxychloroquine, systemic disease), the workup expands to include fundoscopy, optical coherence tomography, visual fields, and review of medications. In a patient on long-term ethambutol with new red-green deficiency, the next best step is to stop the drug and refer to ophthalmology rather than to order further confirmatory testing.

4. Management and Treatment

Setting	Intervention	Notes
Congenital deficiency, asymptomatic	Reassurance, family education, genetic counseling	Inform mother that future sons have 50% risk if she is a carrier
School-aged child	Notify teachers, modify color-coded learning materials	Use labels and patterns alongside color
Occupational counseling	Vocational guidance for color-critical professions	Disqualifying for commercial pilots, locomotive engineers, electrical work in some jurisdictions
Symptomatic adult	Chromatic filter lenses (single eye, neodymium-based)	Improve contrast in some hues, evidence is limited and they do not restore normal vision
Acquired deficiency from drugs	Discontinue causative agent (ethambutol, hydroxychloroquine, digoxin)	Most often partially reversible if caught early
Acquired deficiency from disease	Treat underlying disease (optic neuritis, glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy)	Color vision may improve with disease control
Achromatopsia	Tinted contact lenses, low-vision aids, photophobia management	Gene therapy under investigation, not yet standard of care

Congenital color vision deficiency has no curative treatment. Management centers on counseling, occupational guidance, and adaptive strategies. Parents should be reassured that intelligence, visual acuity, and ocular health are normal, and that the child can be taught to use brightness, position, and labels (for example, the position of traffic light bulbs) instead of hue. A carrier mother should be told that each son has a 50% chance of being affected and each daughter a 50% chance of being a carrier.

For acquired color vision deficiency, the priority is identifying and treating the cause. Ethambutol-induced optic neuropathy is the highest-yield example: any patient on this drug who develops red-green deficiency or decreased visual acuity should have the drug stopped immediately, with prompt ophthalmologic referral. Visual recovery is typically partial and depends on early discontinuation. Hydroxychloroquine toxicity classically produces a bull's eye maculopathy with blue-yellow loss and warrants annual screening with automated visual fields and spectral-domain OCT after five years of therapy or sooner in high-risk patients.

The next best step logic that often appears in question stems is: a child failed school vision screening; visual acuity is 20/20; what now? The answer is Ishihara plates, not formal ophthalmology referral, neuroimaging, or refraction. Conversely, a 35-year-old man with bilateral progressive central scotomas and red-green confusion is not a congenital case; the next best step is fundoscopy and review of medications and toxin exposures because this presentation suggests acquired optic neuropathy.

5. Differential Diagnosis and Distractors

Differential	Why It Is Similar	Key Discriminator
Refractive error or amblyopia	Failed school vision screening	Reduced visual acuity that improves with correction or patching; color vision intact on Ishihara
Optic neuritis	Red-green dyschromatopsia (red desaturation classically)	Painful eye movements, afferent pupillary defect, central scotoma, monocular onset, often a young woman with multiple sclerosis
Ethambutol toxicity	Bilateral red-green deficiency	History of treatment for tuberculosis lasting weeks to months; reversible if drug stopped
Hydroxychloroquine retinopathy	Color vision changes	Bull's eye maculopathy on fundoscopy, paracentral scotomas, blue-yellow rather than red-green loss, long cumulative dose
Age-related macular degeneration	Color discrimination loss in elderly	Drusen and pigmentary changes on fundoscopy, distorted central vision (metamorphopsia), reduced acuity
Glaucoma	Color vision loss	Cupping of the optic disc, elevated intraocular pressure, peripheral visual field loss; tends to give blue-yellow defect (Köllner exception)
Achromatopsia (rod monochromacy)	Severe color vision loss	Photophobia, pendular nystagmus, poor visual acuity from infancy, autosomal recessive (not X-linked)
Cerebral achromatopsia	Loss of color perception	Acquired after occipitotemporal stroke (lingual and fusiform gyri), often with prosopagnosia; normal eye exam

6. Traps and High-Yield Pearls

The most common error is treating color blindness as a one-size-fits-all diagnosis and missing the distinction between congenital and acquired forms. Test writers exploit this in two recurring ways. First, they describe a young boy in a stable family pattern (often with an affected maternal uncle) and the trap is to over-investigate with neuroimaging or referral when the answer is simply Ishihara plates and reassurance with X-linked recessive counseling. Second, they describe an adult with new color vision changes, and the trap is to label this congenital; the actual task is to recognize acquired etiology and identify the causative drug or disease. Ethambutol is the highest-yield offender, and red-green dyschromatopsia is an early warning sign that should prompt immediate drug discontinuation, not dose adjustment or watchful waiting.

A second trap is mixing up the classification suffixes. Remember that -opia means absent (dichromacy) and -anomaly means shifted (anomalous trichromacy). Deuter refers to green (M-cone), prot refers to red (L-cone), and trit refers to blue (S-cone). Deuteranomaly is the most frequent congenital type and the safest default answer when a vignette describes mild red-green confusion in an otherwise healthy boy.

A third trap involves the gold standard question. Ishihara plates are the best initial screening test, but the anomaloscope is the most accurate confirmatory test for red-green deficiency. Confusing screening with confirmation is a common point of failure. Similarly, the Farnsworth-Munsell 100 hue test is the answer when the question asks about quantifying severity or occupational fitness rather than initial diagnosis.

The core competency being tested is recognizing a benign hereditary pattern in children (X-linked recessive red-green deficiency requiring counseling alone) while remaining alert for acquired color vision loss as a sentinel sign of treatable optic nerve, retinal, or drug-induced pathology in adults.

1e:["$","$L2d",null,{"article":{"id":"8e002e16-62c0-41ae-aae7-404391aac2ac","title":"Buta Warna","content":"$2e","category":"Oftalmologi","created_at":"2026-05-02T00:19:17.565836+00:00","status":"published","subcategory":null},"questionCount":0,"sections":[{"id":"section-pathophysiology","num":"01","title":"Pathophysiology"},{"id":"section-classification-of-clinical-manifestations","num":"02","title":"Classification of Clinical Manifestations"},{"id":"section-diagnostic-workup","num":"03","title":"Diagnostic Workup"},{"id":"section-management-and-treatment","num":"04","title":"Management and Treatment"},{"id":"section-differential-diagnosis-and-distractors","num":"05","title":"Differential Diagnosis and Distractors"},{"id":"section-traps-and-high-yield-pearls","num":"06","title":"Traps and High-Yield Pearls"}],"hasSummaryTable":true}]