2d:I[856015,["/_next/static/immutable/chunks/1xzisbplk9czp.js","/_next/static/immutable/chunks/3j2i1faptc_-9.js","/_next/static/immutable/chunks/0fma7nlq6immz.js","/_next/static/immutable/chunks/08tq8rmv423j5.js","/_next/static/immutable/chunks/1chr5wkk3j58k.js","/_next/static/immutable/chunks/37kmmh_zm4dov.js","/_next/static/immutable/chunks/311zvdjfxff-f.js","/_next/static/immutable/chunks/1a_hqhrsle_n_.js"],"default"] 2e:T48d9,

Summary Table

Category	Detail
Risk Factors	Advanced age (most common cause of hearing loss in the elderly), chronic noise exposure, family history, ototoxic medications (aminoglycosides, loop diuretics, cisplatin), cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, smoking
Etiology	Progressive, irreversible degeneration of cochlear structures (hair cells, stria vascularis, spiral ganglion neurons) due to cumulative aging and oxidative stress
Patient Presentation	Gradual, bilateral difficulty hearing conversations, especially in noisy environments; frequently asks others to repeat themselves; may report tinnitus; family members often notice the problem before the patient does
Classic Physical Exam	Normal otoscopic exam (tympanic membrane intact, no middle ear effusion); Weber test lateralizes to the better-hearing ear; Rinne test shows air conduction greater than bone conduction bilaterally (AC > BC)
Key Diagnostic Results	Audiometry reveals bilateral, symmetric, high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss (downsloping curve); speech discrimination may be disproportionately reduced relative to pure-tone thresholds
Management	Amplification with hearing aids (first-line); cochlear implantation for severe-to-profound loss unresponsive to hearing aids; communication strategies and aural rehabilitation
Keywords	"Elderly patient," "difficulty hearing in crowded rooms," "bilateral," "high-frequency loss," "gradually progressive," "normal otoscopy," "AC > BC bilaterally"

1. Pathophysiology

Presbycusis results from the cumulative effect of aging on the cochlea and its neural connections. The cochlea is tonotopically organized: the base encodes high-frequency sounds, while the apex encodes low-frequency sounds. The basal turn of the cochlea receives the highest mechanical stress and the greatest exposure to blood flow turbulence over a lifetime, making it the most vulnerable segment to age-related degeneration. This is precisely why high-frequency hearing is lost first.

At the cellular level, there is progressive loss of outer hair cells in the organ of Corti. Outer hair cells function as cochlear amplifiers; they contract and expand in response to sound waves, enhancing the sensitivity and frequency selectivity of the inner hair cells. When outer hair cells degenerate, the cochlea loses its ability to discriminate sounds at the affected frequencies. This explains why patients complain not just about volume but about clarity, particularly in background noise. They can hear that someone is talking, but they cannot make out the words.

A second mechanism involves degeneration of the stria vascularis, the metabolic engine of the cochlea responsible for maintaining the endocochlear potential (the +80 mV voltage difference in the endolymph that drives hair cell transduction). Loss of strial function leads to a "flat" sensorineural hearing loss pattern, though in clinical practice this often overlaps with the high-frequency pattern. A third mechanism is spiral ganglion neuron loss, which reduces the neural population carrying auditory information to the central nervous system. This neural component explains why some patients have speech discrimination scores that are worse than expected from their pure-tone audiogram alone, a phenomenon sometimes called "phonemic regression."

These mechanisms are not mutually exclusive and often coexist, producing the classic picture: a bilateral, symmetric, gradually progressive sensorineural hearing loss that predominantly affects high frequencies.

2. Classification and Clinical Manifestation

Subtype	Site of Pathology	Audiometric Pattern	Clinical Correlate
Sensory	Outer hair cell loss (basal turn)	Abrupt high-frequency drop ("ski-slope" curve)	Difficulty hearing consonants (s, f, th, sh); speech sounds muffled
Metabolic (Strial)	Stria vascularis atrophy	Flat sensorineural loss across all frequencies	Proportional loss of all sounds; speech discrimination relatively preserved
Neural	Spiral ganglion neuron degeneration	Mild pure-tone loss but severely reduced speech discrimination	"I can hear you talking but I cannot understand the words"
Mechanical (Cochlear conductive)	Stiffening of basilar membrane	Gradual downsloping high-frequency loss	Resembles sensory type on audiometry; distinguished histologically
Mixed	Combination of the above	Variable	Most common real-world presentation in elderly patients

From an exam standpoint, the test-writer rarely asks you to subtype presbycusis. What they do ask is whether you can recognize the sensorineural pattern (bilateral, symmetric, high-frequency, gradually progressive) and distinguish it from a conductive or mixed loss. The classification matters most when a vignette describes disproportionately poor speech understanding despite only mild audiometric loss, pointing toward the neural subtype.

3. Diagnostic Workup

Test	Role	Expected Finding
Otoscopy	Rule out conductive causes (cerumen impaction, TM perforation, middle ear effusion)	Normal
Weber test (512 Hz tuning fork on vertex)	Screening lateralization test	Lateralizes to the better ear (or midline if symmetric)
Rinne test (512 Hz tuning fork)	Distinguish sensorineural from conductive loss	AC > BC bilaterally (positive Rinne bilaterally)
Pure-tone audiometry	Best initial test and the cornerstone of diagnosis	Bilateral, symmetric, downsloping high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss
Speech audiometry (speech recognition threshold + word recognition score)	Quantifies functional impairment	SRT correlates with pure-tone average; word recognition score may be disproportionately reduced in neural-type presbycusis
MRI of internal auditory canals	Rule out retrocochlear pathology (vestibular schwannoma)	Order if asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss or unilateral tinnitus

Pure-tone audiometry is the best initial test and, for presbycusis, effectively functions as the confirmatory test as well. The diagnosis is clinical: an elderly patient with a normal otoscopic exam and a bilateral symmetric high-frequency sensorineural pattern on audiometry has presbycusis until proven otherwise.

The critical diagnostic decision point on an exam is recognizing when additional workup is needed. If the vignette describes asymmetric hearing loss (one ear is considerably worse), a unilateral tinnitus, or any accompanying neurologic deficit (facial nerve palsy, vertigo), the next step is MRI with gadolinium of the internal auditory canals to exclude a vestibular schwannoma (acoustic neuroma). This is one of the highest-yield distinctions the test-writer will probe. Symmetric bilateral loss points to presbycusis; asymmetric unilateral loss with tinnitus points to schwannoma.

Tympanometry is useful when you suspect a conductive component. In pure presbycusis, tympanometry shows a Type A (normal) tympanogram, confirming intact middle ear mechanics.

4. Management and Treatment

Intervention	Indication	Details
Hearing aids	First-line for mild-to-severe presbycusis	Bilateral fitting preferred; digital programmable aids adjusted to amplify high frequencies selectively
Cochlear implant	Severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss with inadequate benefit from hearing aids	Surgically implanted electrode array in the cochlea bypasses damaged hair cells and directly stimulates the auditory nerve
Assistive listening devices	Adjunct in all stages	FM systems, amplified telephones, captioned media
Aural rehabilitation	Adjunct	Lip-reading training, communication strategy counseling, auditory training exercises
Ototoxic medication review	All patients	Discontinue or substitute offending agents where possible (aminoglycosides, high-dose loop diuretics, cisplatin)

Hearing aids are the first-line treatment for presbycusis across all severity grades where the patient still has usable residual hearing. Modern digital hearing aids are programmed to preferentially amplify the high-frequency range that is most affected, restoring clarity rather than simply increasing volume. Bilateral fitting is preferred for bilateral loss, as it improves sound localization and speech understanding in noise.

For patients with severe-to-profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss who derive minimal benefit from optimally fitted hearing aids (typically defined as word recognition scores below 50% in the best-aided condition), cochlear implantation becomes the next step. There is no strict age cutoff for cochlear implantation; elderly patients who are surgical candidates can benefit substantially. The exam may test whether you know that cochlear implants require an intact auditory nerve to function, since the device bypasses the hair cells but relies on spiral ganglion neurons for signal transmission.

There is no pharmacologic cure for presbycusis. No medication has been shown to reverse or halt the progression. This is a commonly tested concept: if a vignette offers you a drug-based answer choice for treating age-related hearing loss, it is a distractor.

A frequently overlooked but testable management point is reviewing the medication list. Loop diuretics (furosemide at high doses), aminoglycosides, and platinum-based chemotherapeutics are ototoxic and can accelerate cochlear damage. The exam may present a patient already on one of these agents whose hearing has recently worsened, and the best next step is to address the offending medication.

5. Differential Diagnosis and Distractors

Differential Diagnosis	Why It Looks Similar	Key Discriminator
Vestibular schwannoma (acoustic neuroma)	Sensorineural hearing loss, tinnitus, elderly patient	Unilateral or markedly asymmetric loss; may have facial nerve palsy or vestibular symptoms; MRI shows enhancing CPA mass
Noise-induced hearing loss	Bilateral sensorineural high-frequency loss	Characteristic 4 kHz notch on audiogram with recovery at 8 kHz; history of occupational or recreational noise exposure; younger patient population
Otosclerosis	Progressive hearing loss in an adult, bilateral involvement possible	Conductive hearing loss (BC > AC on Rinne); low-frequency loss early; Carhart notch at 2 kHz on audiometry; normal otoscopy; young to middle-aged woman
Meniere disease	Hearing loss, tinnitus, elderly patient possible	Episodic nature; associated with vertigo and aural fullness; low-frequency sensorineural loss (early stages); fluctuating hearing
Cerumen impaction	Hearing loss in elderly, gradual onset	Conductive loss; abnormal otoscopy reveals impacted cerumen; Weber lateralizes to the affected ear; Rinne negative on the affected side
Ototoxicity (drug-induced)	Bilateral sensorineural high-frequency loss	Temporal correlation with offending drug (aminoglycoside, cisplatin, high-dose loop diuretic); may be reversible if the agent is stopped early; often more rapid onset

6. Traps and High-Yield Pearls

The single most common way students miss questions on presbycusis is by failing to recognize asymmetry as a red flag. The test-writer designs the vignette to look like routine age-related hearing loss, then buries an asymmetric detail (one ear is considerably worse, or there is unilateral tinnitus). The student who reflexively selects "hearing aids" without ordering an MRI has fallen into the trap. Whenever a sensorineural hearing loss is asymmetric, the next step is MRI to rule out vestibular schwannoma, regardless of the patient's age.

A second common error is confusing the tuning fork results. Students must remember that in sensorineural loss, Rinne remains positive (AC > BC) bilaterally because both air and bone conduction are reduced proportionally, and Weber lateralizes to the better ear. A negative Rinne (BC > AC) points to conductive pathology and should immediately redirect you away from presbycusis.

The third trap involves the audiometric pattern. Presbycusis produces a smooth downsloping high-frequency curve. If the audiogram shows a notch at 4 kHz with recovery at higher frequencies, that pattern belongs to noise-induced hearing loss, not presbycusis. The test-writer may describe an elderly factory worker to tempt you into choosing presbycusis when the audiometric finding actually points to chronic noise exposure.

The core competency being tested is whether you can accurately classify a hearing loss as sensorineural vs. conductive using tuning fork tests and audiometry, and whether you understand the clinical significance of symmetric vs. asymmetric patterns in guiding further workup.

1e:["$","$L2d",null,{"article":{"id":"cd824083-a72d-4be5-9477-73a4c9db41f3","title":"Presbikusis","content":"$2e","category":"THT-KL","created_at":"2026-05-15T09:09:43.398167+00:00","status":"published","subcategory":null},"questionCount":2,"sections":[{"id":"section-pathophysiology","num":"01","title":"Pathophysiology"},{"id":"section-classification-and-clinical-manifestation","num":"02","title":"Classification and Clinical Manifestation"},{"id":"section-diagnostic-workup","num":"03","title":"Diagnostic Workup"},{"id":"section-management-and-treatment","num":"04","title":"Management and Treatment"},{"id":"section-differential-diagnosis-and-distractors","num":"05","title":"Differential Diagnosis and Distractors"},{"id":"section-traps-and-high-yield-pearls","num":"06","title":"Traps and High-Yield Pearls"}],"hasSummaryTable":true}]