Dermatitis Numularis
Published on September 19, 2026
Risk Factors
Middle-aged to elderly men (peak 55-65 years), young women (15-25 years), history of atopy, xerosis, cold/dry climate, emotional stress, chronic alcohol use, venous stasis of lower extremities
Etiology
Multifactorial: epidermal barrier dysfunction, xerosis-driven inflammation, possible role of Staphylococcus aureus colonization, contact allergen sensitization
Presentation
Intensely pruritic, well-demarcated, coin-shaped (nummular) erythematous plaques, most commonly on the extensor surfaces of the extremities
Classic Exam
Round or oval plaques with crusting, scaling, and sometimes grouped vesicles; bilateral but asymmetric distribution; lower legs predominate in men, upper extremities and trunk in women
Diagnostics
Clinical diagnosis; KOH preparation is negative (critical to exclude dermatophyte infection); biopsy, if performed, shows spongiotic dermatitis
Management
Aggressive emollient use, medium- to high-potency topical corticosteroids, oral antibiotics if secondary S. aureus infection is present
Keywords
"Coin-shaped plaques," "discoid," "well-demarcated round lesions," "KOH-negative," "xerosis," "extensor surfaces"
01Pathophysiology
Nummular dermatitis is a form of eczematous dermatitis characterized by its distinctive coin-shaped morphology ("nummular" derives from the Latin nummulus, meaning "little coin"). The fundamental defect lies in epidermal barrier dysfunction. In susceptible individuals, the stratum corneum fails to retain adequate moisture, leading to increased transepidermal water loss (TEWL). This barrier breakdown is why xerosis (dry skin) is both a risk factor and a perpetuating mechanism: as the skin dries, it cracks and allows environmental irritants and allergens to penetrate, triggering an inflammatory cascade.
At the histologic level, the hallmark is spongiosis, which refers to intercellular edema within the epidermis. Fluid accumulates between keratinocytes, weakening desmosomal attachments and eventually forming intraepidermal vesicles. This explains the clinical progression from early weeping, vesicular lesions to later dry, scaly, and lichenified plaques as the process becomes chronic. The localized, round morphology is believed to arise from discrete foci of barrier disruption that expand centrifugally.
Bacterial colonization, particularly by Staphylococcus aureus, plays a significant role. The disrupted barrier provides a favorable environment for bacterial adherence and biofilm formation. Staphylococcal superantigens can then amplify the T-cell-mediated inflammatory response, creating a cycle of inflammation, barrier damage, and secondary infection that sustains the disease. This is why treatment of bacterial superinfection often leads to notable clinical improvement.
The intense pruritus is mediated by a combination of inflammatory cytokines (IL-4, IL-13, IL-31) and histamine release from dermal mast cells. Scratching further damages the barrier, establishing an itch-scratch cycle that perpetuates the condition.
02Classification and Clinical Manifestation
Acute
Morphology
Vesicular, weeping, crusted plaques
Key Features
Grouped vesicles on an erythematous base coalescing into coin-shaped patches; serous exudate; intense pruritus
Predominant Location
Lower legs (men), upper extremities (women)
Subacute
Morphology
Erythematous, scaly plaques
Key Features
Well-demarcated round plaques with fine to moderate scaling; less exudate; persistent pruritus
Predominant Location
Extensor extremities, trunk
Chronic
Morphology
Lichenified, dry plaques
Key Features
Thickened, hyperpigmented plaques with accentuated skin markings; minimal vesiculation; moderate pruritus
Predominant Location
Same distribution, may spread
Stage | Morphology | Key Features | Predominant Location |
|---|---|---|---|
Acute | Vesicular, weeping, crusted plaques | Grouped vesicles on an erythematous base coalescing into coin-shaped patches; serous exudate; intense pruritus | Lower legs (men), upper extremities (women) |
Subacute | Erythematous, scaly plaques | Well-demarcated round plaques with fine to moderate scaling; less exudate; persistent pruritus | Extensor extremities, trunk |
Chronic | Lichenified, dry plaques | Thickened, hyperpigmented plaques with accentuated skin markings; minimal vesiculation; moderate pruritus | Same distribution, may spread |
Distribution patterns by demographics:
Older men (55-65 yr)
Typical Distribution
Lower legs (pretibial), dorsal hands
Associated Factors
Xerosis, venous stasis, low-humidity environments
Young women (15-25 yr)
Typical Distribution
Upper extremities, trunk, thighs
Associated Factors
Atopic background, contact sensitization, emotional stress
Children
Typical Distribution
Cheeks, trunk, extensor extremities
Associated Factors
Atopic dermatitis overlap, dry winter months
Population | Typical Distribution | Associated Factors |
|---|---|---|
Older men (55-65 yr) | Lower legs (pretibial), dorsal hands | Xerosis, venous stasis, low-humidity environments |
Young women (15-25 yr) | Upper extremities, trunk, thighs | Atopic background, contact sensitization, emotional stress |
Children | Cheeks, trunk, extensor extremities | Atopic dermatitis overlap, dry winter months |
A clinically important variant is the dry (xerotic) form, which lacks vesiculation entirely and presents as round, scaly, erythematous patches on dry skin. This form is common in winter months and can be misidentified as psoriasis or tinea.
03Diagnostic Workup
KOH preparation
Purpose
Rule out tinea corporis
Expected Finding
Negative (no hyphae or spores)
Role
Best initial test to exclude the primary differential
Clinical examination
Purpose
Primary diagnostic method
Expected Finding
Coin-shaped, well-demarcated eczematous plaques
Role
Diagnosis is made clinically in the majority of cases
Fungal culture
Purpose
Definitive exclusion of dermatophyte infection
Expected Finding
No growth
Role
Ordered when KOH is equivocal
Skin biopsy
Purpose
Confirm diagnosis when clinical picture is unclear
Expected Finding
Spongiotic dermatitis with perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate
Role
Most accurate test (rarely needed)
Patch testing
Purpose
Identify contributory contact allergens
Expected Finding
Positive reaction to metals (nickel), fragrances, or preservatives
Role
Considered in refractory or atypical cases
Wound culture
Purpose
Evaluate for secondary infection
Expected Finding
Growth of S. aureus
Role
Ordered when crusting, purulence, or treatment failure suggests superinfectio
Test | Purpose | Expected Finding | Role |
|---|---|---|---|
KOH preparation | Rule out tinea corporis | Negative (no hyphae or spores) | Best initial test to exclude the primary differential |
Clinical examination | Primary diagnostic method | Coin-shaped, well-demarcated eczematous plaques | Diagnosis is made clinically in the majority of cases |
Fungal culture | Definitive exclusion of dermatophyte infection | No growth | Ordered when KOH is equivocal |
Skin biopsy | Confirm diagnosis when clinical picture is unclear | Spongiotic dermatitis with perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate | Most accurate test (rarely needed) |
Patch testing | Identify contributory contact allergens | Positive reaction to metals (nickel), fragrances, or preservatives | Considered in refractory or atypical cases |
Wound culture | Evaluate for secondary infection | Growth of S. aureus | Ordered when crusting, purulence, or treatment failure suggests superinfectio |
The diagnosis of nummular dermatitis is predominantly clinical, based on the characteristic coin-shaped morphology and distribution pattern. However, the single most important step in the workup is a KOH preparation of skin scrapings. This test exists to answer one question: is this tinea corporis or nummular dermatitis? Tinea corporis (ringworm) is the most common diagnostic pitfall because both conditions present as round, scaly, erythematous plaques. A positive KOH showing branching hyphae confirms tinea. A negative KOH supports nummular dermatitis. On an exam, expect a vignette that describes a coin-shaped plaque and then tells you the KOH is negative. That negative KOH is your signal.
If the KOH result is ambiguous or if there is strong clinical suspicion for fungal infection despite a negative prep, a fungal culture can be sent. This takes days to weeks to result but offers definitive exclusion.
Skin biopsy is reserved for atypical presentations or cases that fail standard therapy. Histopathology will show spongiotic dermatitis: intercellular edema in the epidermis with a perivascular lymphocytic and sometimes eosinophilic infiltrate in the dermis. In chronic lesions, you will see acanthosis (epidermal thickening) and reduced spongiosis. This finding is not unique to nummular dermatitis (it is the general pattern of eczematous dermatitis), so biopsy confirms the category of disease rather than the exact diagnosis.
Patch testing should be considered in cases that are resistant to treatment, as an underlying contact allergy (commonly nickel, cobalt, fragrance, or balsam of Peru) may be driving the condition. This is particularly relevant in women with upper-extremity involvement.
04Management and Treatment
All patients (foundation)
Intervention
Emollients
Details
Thick, fragrance-free ointments (petrolatum-based) applied liberally after bathing; cornerstone of therapy
Mild to moderate disease
Intervention
Medium-potency topical corticosteroids
Details
Triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% ointment, applied twice daily for 2-4 weeks
Moderate to severe disease
Intervention
High-potency topical corticosteroids
Details
Betamethasone dipropionate 0.05% or clobetasol propionate 0.05% ointment, twice daily for up to 2 weeks (body), then taper
Sensitive areas (face, folds)
Intervention
Topical calcineurin inhibitors
Details
Tacrolimus 0.1% ointment or pimecrolimus 1% cream, twice daily
Secondary infection
Intervention
Oral antibiotics
Details
Cephalexin 500 mg QID or dicloxacillin 500 mg QID for 7-10 days
Nocturnal pruritus
Intervention
Sedating antihistamines
Details
Hydroxyzine 25-50 mg at bedtime
Refractory disease
Intervention
Narrowband UVB phototherapy
Details
2-3 sessions per week for 8-12 weeks
Severe/widespread refractory
Intervention
Systemic immunosuppressants
Details
Methotrexate, azathioprine, or dupilumab (in atopy-associated cases)
Setting | Intervention | Details |
|---|---|---|
All patients (foundation) | Emollients | Thick, fragrance-free ointments (petrolatum-based) applied liberally after bathing; cornerstone of therapy |
Mild to moderate disease | Medium-potency topical corticosteroids | Triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% ointment, applied twice daily for 2-4 weeks |
Moderate to severe disease | High-potency topical corticosteroids | Betamethasone dipropionate 0.05% or clobetasol propionate 0.05% ointment, twice daily for up to 2 weeks (body), then taper |
Sensitive areas (face, folds) | Topical calcineurin inhibitors | Tacrolimus 0.1% ointment or pimecrolimus 1% cream, twice daily |
Secondary infection | Oral antibiotics | Cephalexin 500 mg QID or dicloxacillin 500 mg QID for 7-10 days |
Nocturnal pruritus | Sedating antihistamines | Hydroxyzine 25-50 mg at bedtime |
Refractory disease | Narrowband UVB phototherapy | 2-3 sessions per week for 8-12 weeks |
Severe/widespread refractory | Systemic immunosuppressants | Methotrexate, azathioprine, or dupilumab (in atopy-associated cases) |
Step 1: Barrier Repair and Emollient Therapy.
Before any pharmacologic intervention, every patient must receive education about skin hydration. The "soak-and-seal" method is central: a lukewarm bath for 10-15 minutes followed by immediate application of a thick emollient (preferably petrolatum or a ceramide-containing ointment) within 3 minutes of patting the skin dry. This should be performed at least once daily and ideally twice daily. Patients should avoid hot water, harsh soaps, and wool clothing. This step alone can reduce flare frequency and severity.
Step 2: Topical Corticosteroids.
These are the first-line pharmacologic therapy. The potency selected should match the severity and location:
Body and extremities: Start with triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% ointment (medium potency), applied twice daily for 2 to 4 weeks. If response is inadequate, escalate to betamethasone dipropionate 0.05% ointment (high potency) for up to 2 weeks.
Face, intertriginous areas, and thin-skinned regions: Use low-potency agents (hydrocortisone 2.5%) or topical calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus 0.1%) to avoid steroid-induced skin atrophy.
For thick, lichenified chronic plaques, occlusion with plastic wrap over the topical steroid overnight for 1-2 weeks enhances penetration.
Step 3: Treat Secondary Infection.
If there is honey-colored crusting, purulent drainage, or sudden worsening, suspect S. aureus superinfection. Obtain a wound culture and start empiric oral antibiotics covering S. aureus: cephalexin 500 mg four times daily or dicloxacillin 500 mg four times daily for 7-10 days. For localized, mild superinfection, mupirocin 2% ointment three times daily for 5-10 days is a reasonable alternative. Treating bacterial colonization often produces a dramatic improvement in lesions that seemed refractory to steroids alone.
Step 4: Manage Pruritus.
Itch control is essential to break the itch-scratch cycle. For daytime pruritus, non-sedating antihistamines (cetirizine 10 mg daily) provide mild relief, though their efficacy in eczematous itch is limited. Hydroxyzine 25-50 mg at bedtime is preferred for nocturnal pruritus because its sedating properties also improve sleep disrupted by scratching.
Step 5: Refractory Disease.
For patients who fail topical therapy after 4-6 weeks, narrowband UVB phototherapy is the next step. Sessions are performed 2-3 times per week for 8-12 weeks. This approach is particularly useful for widespread disease where applying topical steroids is impractical. If phototherapy is unavailable or ineffective, systemic agents such as methotrexate (10-15 mg weekly), azathioprine (1-3 mg/kg/day), or dupilumab (for cases with significant atopic overlap) may be considered under specialist supervision.
Contraindications and cautions:
Avoid prolonged high-potency topical steroids on the face, groin, and axillae (risk of striae, atrophy, telangiectasias).
Oral corticosteroids are generally avoided because nummular dermatitis rebounds aggressively upon discontinuation.
In pregnant patients, low- to medium-potency topical corticosteroids are considered safe; calcineurin inhibitors and systemic agents require careful risk-benefit assessment.
05Differential Diagnosis and Distractors
Tinea corporis
Why It Is Similar
Round, scaly, erythematous plaques on the body; the single most confusing mimic
Key Discriminator
Tinea shows central clearing with a raised, advancing border and KOH is positive for branching hyphae. Nummular dermatitis is uniformly involved across the plaque with KOH negative.
Psoriasis (plaque type)
Why It Is Similar
Well-demarcated, erythematous, scaly plaques
Key Discriminator
Psoriasis has silvery-white, micaceous scale with Auspitz sign (pinpoint bleeding upon scale removal), and typically involves the scalp, elbows, knees, and sacrum. Nail pitting and joint involvement are additional clues.
Allergic contact dermatitis
Why It Is Similar
Erythematous, vesicular, pruritic eczematous lesions
Key Discriminator
Contact dermatitis follows a geometric or exposure-determined distribution (e.g., linear streaks from plant contact, watch-band distribution from nickel). Nummular dermatitis is coin-shaped without a clear exposure pattern.
Atopic dermatitis
Why It Is Similar
Chronic, pruritic, eczematous condition; histology is identical (spongiotic dermatitis)
Key Discriminator
Atopic dermatitis favors flexural surfaces (antecubital and popliteal fossae), presents in patients with a personal or family history of the atopic triad (asthma, allergic rhinitis, eczema), and has an earlier onset in childhood.
Stasis dermatitis
Why It Is Similar
Erythematous, scaly plaques on the lower legs in older adults
Key Discriminator
Stasis dermatitis is localized to the medial malleolus and medial lower leg, accompanied by varicose veins, edema, and hemosiderin hyperpigmentation. It is bilateral and symmetric, unlike nummular dermatitis.
Mycosis fungoides (cutaneous T-cell lymphoma)
Why It Is Similar
Chronic, scaly patches or plaques that can be round and eczematous-appearing
Key Discriminator
Mycosis fungoides occurs in non-sun-exposed areas (bathing trunk distribution), shows poikiloderma (atrophy, telangiectasia, dyspigmentation), and biopsy reveals epidermotropic atypical lymphocytes (Pautrier microabscesses).
Differential | Why It Is Similar | Key Discriminator |
|---|---|---|
Tinea corporis | Round, scaly, erythematous plaques on the body; the single most confusing mimic | Tinea shows central clearing with a raised, advancing border and KOH is positive for branching hyphae. Nummular dermatitis is uniformly involved across the plaque with KOH negative. |
Psoriasis (plaque type) | Well-demarcated, erythematous, scaly plaques | Psoriasis has silvery-white, micaceous scale with Auspitz sign (pinpoint bleeding upon scale removal), and typically involves the scalp, elbows, knees, and sacrum. Nail pitting and joint involvement are additional clues. |
Allergic contact dermatitis | Erythematous, vesicular, pruritic eczematous lesions | Contact dermatitis follows a geometric or exposure-determined distribution (e.g., linear streaks from plant contact, watch-band distribution from nickel). Nummular dermatitis is coin-shaped without a clear exposure pattern. |
Atopic dermatitis | Chronic, pruritic, eczematous condition; histology is identical (spongiotic dermatitis) | Atopic dermatitis favors flexural surfaces (antecubital and popliteal fossae), presents in patients with a personal or family history of the atopic triad (asthma, allergic rhinitis, eczema), and has an earlier onset in childhood. |
Stasis dermatitis | Erythematous, scaly plaques on the lower legs in older adults | Stasis dermatitis is localized to the medial malleolus and medial lower leg, accompanied by varicose veins, edema, and hemosiderin hyperpigmentation. It is bilateral and symmetric, unlike nummular dermatitis. |
Mycosis fungoides (cutaneous T-cell lymphoma) | Chronic, scaly patches or plaques that can be round and eczematous-appearing | Mycosis fungoides occurs in non-sun-exposed areas (bathing trunk distribution), shows poikiloderma (atrophy, telangiectasia, dyspigmentation), and biopsy reveals epidermotropic atypical lymphocytes (Pautrier microabscesses). |
06Traps and High-Yield Pearls
The single most common trap with nummular dermatitis on an exam is confusing it with tinea corporis. Both present as round, erythematous, scaly plaques. The vignette will describe a patient with a "coin-shaped" or "round" plaque on the leg and then give you a KOH result. If the KOH is positive, the answer is tinea. If the KOH is negative, the answer is nummular dermatitis. Students who do not read the KOH result carefully will pick tinea every time because the morphology looks identical. The exam is testing whether you understand that morphologic overlap demands a laboratory discriminator before committing to a diagnosis.
A second common error is treating nummular dermatitis with topical antifungals based on appearance alone without performing a KOH preparation first. The vignette may describe a patient who was started on clotrimazole by an outside provider and shows no improvement. The "failure to improve on antifungals" is the clue that this is not a fungal process.
Another testable point is the role of secondary bacterial infection. A vignette may describe a patient with worsening, crusted, weeping lesions that are unresponsive to topical steroids. The next best step in management is to obtain a culture and start oral antibiotics targeting S. aureus, not to escalate the steroid potency.
Finally, be aware that systemic corticosteroids are a distractor answer for severe nummular dermatitis. While they will transiently improve the condition, the disease rebounds upon discontinuation, often worse than baseline. The correct approach for refractory disease is phototherapy or steroid-sparing systemic agents, not a prednisone taper.
The core competency being tested is the ability to differentiate morphologically similar dermatologic conditions using the correct diagnostic test, and to recognize that treatment failure is a clinical clue pointing toward either a wrong diagnosis or an unaddressed complicating factor like superinfection.