Diseksi Aorta
Published on September 21, 2026
Risk Factors
Chronic hypertension (most common, present in ~70% of cases), Marfan syndrome, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (type IV), bicuspid aortic valve, Turner syndrome, third-trimester pregnancy, cocaine/amphetamine use, prior aortic surgery, coarctation of the aorta, iatrogenic (catheterization)
Etiology
Tear in the tunica intima of the aorta allowing blood to enter and dissect through the tunica media, creating a false lumen
Presentation
Sudden-onset, severe "tearing" or "ripping" chest pain radiating to the back, often described as the worst pain of the patient's life; may migrate as the dissection propagates
Classic Exam
Blood pressure differential >20 mmHg between arms, asymmetric or absent peripheral pulses, new aortic regurgitation murmur (early diastolic, decrescendo), widened pulse pressure, signs of end-organ malperfusion (stroke, limb ischemia, renal failure)
Diagnostics
CT angiography (CTA) of the chest showing intimal flap and true/false lumen; chest X-ray may show widened mediastinum; transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) as alternative in unstable patients
Management
Type A (ascending): emergent surgical repair. Type B (descending): IV beta-blockers first (esmolol or labetalol) to reduce heart rate (<60 bpm) and systolic BP (100-120 mmHg), then add vasodilators (nitroprusside) if needed. Surgery for Type B only if complicated.
Keywords
"Tearing/ripping chest pain radiating to the back," "blood pressure discrepancy between arms," "widened mediastinum on CXR," "Marfan habitus," "cocaine use with chest pain," "migratory chest pain," "new diastolic murmur"
01Pathophysiology
Aortic dissection begins with a tear in the tunica intima of the aortic wall. Once the intima is breached, the force of arterial blood under high pressure enters the tunica media and splits it longitudinally, creating two channels: the true lumen (the original aortic channel) and the false lumen (the newly formed space within the media). The dissection can propagate either anterograde (distally) or retrograde (proximally) along the length of the aorta.
The most important predisposing factor is chronic hypertension, which causes long-standing shear stress on the aortic wall, leading to cystic medial degeneration (previously called cystic medial necrosis). This is the histopathological hallmark: degeneration and fragmentation of elastic fibers and smooth muscle cells in the media, with accumulation of mucoid (basophilic) ground substance. In connective tissue disorders such as Marfan syndrome (fibrillin-1 mutation) and Ehlers-Danlos type IV (type III collagen defect), the aortic wall is inherently weak, predisposing to dissection even at younger ages and lower blood pressures.
The reason the pain is described as "tearing" and "migratory" is directly tied to the pathophysiology: as the dissection flap extends along the aorta, it stretches adventitial nerve fibers sequentially. A dissection beginning in the ascending aorta causes anterior chest pain; as it propagates into the descending aorta, the pain migrates to the interscapular region and even the abdomen.
Clinical consequences depend on which branch vessels are compromised by the dissection flap:
Coronary arteries (most commonly the right coronary artery): acute MI, typically inferior STEMI
Brachiocephalic/subclavian arteries: blood pressure discrepancy between arms, upper limb ischemia
Carotid arteries: stroke or altered mental status
Spinal arteries: paraplegia (anterior spinal artery syndrome)
Renal arteries: acute renal failure, refractory hypertension
Mesenteric arteries: bowel ischemia
Iliac arteries: lower extremity ischemia
If the dissection extends retrograde into the aortic root, it can disrupt the aortic valve apparatus, causing acute aortic regurgitation (the new early diastolic murmur in the vignette). It can also rupture into the pericardial sac, resulting in cardiac tamponade (Beck's triad: hypotension, distended neck veins, muffled heart sounds), which is the leading cause of death in proximal dissections.
02Classification and Clinical Manifestation
Stanford Classification (Most Tested)
Type A
Anatomy
Involves the ascending aorta (with or without descending involvement)
Frequency
~60-65%
Key Feature
Requires emergent surgery regardless of complications
Type B
Anatomy
Involves only the descending aorta (distal to the left subclavian artery)
Frequency
~35-40%
Key Feature
Managed medically unless complicated
Type | Anatomy | Frequency | Key Feature |
|---|---|---|---|
Type A | Involves the ascending aorta (with or without descending involvement) | ~60-65% | Requires emergent surgery regardless of complications |
Type B | Involves only the descending aorta (distal to the left subclavian artery) | ~35-40% | Managed medically unless complicated |
DeBakey Classification (Less Commonly Tested)
Type | Anatomy |
|---|---|
Type I | Originates in ascending aorta, propagates to at least the aortic arch and often beyond |
Type II | Originates in and is confined to the ascending aorta only |
Type III | Originates in the descending aorta (IIIa: limited to thoracic; IIIb: extends below diaphragm) |
Clinical Manifestation by Malperfusion Syndrome
Aortic root/valve
Clinical Finding
Acute aortic regurgitation, heart failure
Approximate Frequency
30-50% of Type A
Coronary ostia (usually RCA)
Clinical Finding
Inferior MI pattern on ECG
Approximate Frequency
1-2%
Brachiocephalic/subclavian
Clinical Finding
BP discrepancy between arms, arm ischemia
Approximate Frequency
15-30%
Carotid arteries
Clinical Finding
Stroke, syncope, altered consciousness
Approximate Frequency
5-10%
Spinal arteries
Clinical Finding
Paraplegia/paraparesis
Approximate Frequency
2-5%
Celiac/mesenteric
Clinical Finding
Abdominal pain, bowel ischemia, lactic acidosis
Approximate Frequency
3-5%
Renal arteries
Clinical Finding
Oliguria, rising creatinine, hematuria
Approximate Frequency
5-8%
Iliac arteries
Clinical Finding
Acute lower extremity ischemia, pulse deficit
Approximate Frequency
10-15%
Pericardium (rupture)
Clinical Finding
Cardiac tamponade
Approximate Frequency
8-10% of Type A
Compromised Branch | Clinical Finding | Approximate Frequency |
|---|---|---|
Aortic root/valve | Acute aortic regurgitation, heart failure | 30-50% of Type A |
Coronary ostia (usually RCA) | Inferior MI pattern on ECG | 1-2% |
Brachiocephalic/subclavian | BP discrepancy between arms, arm ischemia | 15-30% |
Carotid arteries | Stroke, syncope, altered consciousness | 5-10% |
Spinal arteries | Paraplegia/paraparesis | 2-5% |
Celiac/mesenteric | Abdominal pain, bowel ischemia, lactic acidosis | 3-5% |
Renal arteries | Oliguria, rising creatinine, hematuria | 5-8% |
Iliac arteries | Acute lower extremity ischemia, pulse deficit | 10-15% |
Pericardium (rupture) | Cardiac tamponade | 8-10% of Type A |
Temporal Classification
Category | Timeline |
|---|---|
Hyperacute | Symptom onset <24 hours |
Acute | Symptom onset <14 days |
Subacute | 14-90 days |
Chronic | >90 days |
The distinction between acute and chronic matters because mortality is highest in the first 48 hours (approximately 1-2% per hour in untreated Type A), making rapid diagnosis and treatment the central exam concept.
03Diagnostic Workup
Chest X-ray (CXR)
Role
Initial screening (often first obtained)
Key Finding
Widened mediastinum (>8 cm), abnormal aortic contour, left pleural effusion, tracheal deviation to the right
CT Angiography (CTA) of chest/abdomen/pelvis
Role
Best initial confirmatory test (test of choice in stable patients)
Key Finding
Intimal flap separating true and false lumen, extent of dissection, branch vessel involvement
Transesophageal Echocardiography (TEE)
Role
Best test for hemodynamically unstable patients or intraoperative use
Key Finding
Intimal flap, true/false lumen, aortic regurgitation, pericardial effusion
MRI/MRA
Role
Most accurate overall (highest sensitivity and specificity) but rarely used acutely
Key Finding
Intimal flap, false lumen flow; limited by time, availability, monitoring difficulty
D-dimer
Role
Screening adjunct (high negative predictive value)
Key Finding
Elevated in dissection; a normal D-dimer helps rule out dissection in low-probability patients
ECG
Role
Rule out acute MI as primary diagnosis
Key Finding
May be normal, show LVH pattern, or show inferior ST elevation if RCA is involved
Aortography
Role
Historical gold standard (largely replaced)
Key Finding
False lumen opacification; rarely performed today
Test | Role | Key Finding |
|---|---|---|
Chest X-ray (CXR) | Initial screening (often first obtained) | Widened mediastinum (>8 cm), abnormal aortic contour, left pleural effusion, tracheal deviation to the right |
CT Angiography (CTA) of chest/abdomen/pelvis | Best initial confirmatory test (test of choice in stable patients) | Intimal flap separating true and false lumen, extent of dissection, branch vessel involvement |
Transesophageal Echocardiography (TEE) | Best test for hemodynamically unstable patients or intraoperative use | Intimal flap, true/false lumen, aortic regurgitation, pericardial effusion |
MRI/MRA | Most accurate overall (highest sensitivity and specificity) but rarely used acutely | Intimal flap, false lumen flow; limited by time, availability, monitoring difficulty |
D-dimer | Screening adjunct (high negative predictive value) | Elevated in dissection; a normal D-dimer helps rule out dissection in low-probability patients |
ECG | Rule out acute MI as primary diagnosis | May be normal, show LVH pattern, or show inferior ST elevation if RCA is involved |
Aortography | Historical gold standard (largely replaced) | False lumen opacification; rarely performed today |
The first imaging study a patient often receives is a portable chest X-ray, which can be done at the bedside. The hallmark finding is a widened mediastinum (>8 cm at the level of the aortic knob on a PA film). However, up to 10-20% of dissections have a normal CXR, so a normal film does not rule out the diagnosis. If clinical suspicion is high, you must proceed to advanced imaging regardless of the CXR result.
CT angiography (CTA) is the best initial test in a hemodynamically stable patient. It is fast (seconds to acquire), widely available, and has sensitivity and specificity both exceeding 95%. The diagnostic finding is the intimal flap with contrast opacification of both the true and false lumen. CTA also maps the full extent of the dissection and identifies involvement of branch vessels, which guides surgical planning.
TEE is the preferred test when the patient is too unstable to leave the emergency department or ICU for the CT scanner. It can be performed at the bedside or in the operating room and provides real-time assessment of the ascending aorta, aortic valve function, and pericardial space. Its limitation is a "blind spot" in the distal ascending aorta and proximal arch due to tracheal/bronchial air interference.
MRI/MRA has the highest combined sensitivity and specificity (approaching 98-100%) and is therefore the most accurate test overall. However, it is impractical in the acute setting because it requires prolonged scan times, limits monitoring access, and is often unavailable on an emergent basis. It is most useful for follow-up of chronic or stable dissections.
D-dimer is worth understanding for exam purposes. It is elevated in aortic dissection because of the activation of the coagulation cascade within the false lumen. Its primary utility is its negative predictive value: in patients with a low pretest probability (Aortic Dissection Detection risk score of 0), a normal D-dimer effectively excludes dissection. However, a positive D-dimer is nondiagnostic and cannot confirm dissection on its own.
An ECG must always be obtained because the differential includes acute MI. However, be careful: if the dissection involves the right coronary ostium, the ECG may show inferior STEMI. The critical teaching point is that thrombolytics and anticoagulation are absolutely contraindicated in dissection. This is why you must consider dissection before treating an apparent MI, especially if the chest pain is described as tearing, there is a BP discrepancy, or the patient has a widened mediastinum.
04Management & Treatment
All patients (immediate)
Management
IV beta-blocker first: Esmolol (preferred: 500 mcg/kg bolus, then 50-200 mcg/kg/min infusion) or Labetalol (20 mg IV bolus, then 1-2 mg/min infusion)
Target
HR <60 bpm, SBP 100-120 mmHg
If BP remains elevated after beta-blockade
Management
Add IV sodium nitroprusside (0.25-10 mcg/kg/min) ONLY after adequate beta-blockade is established
Target
SBP 100-120 mmHg
Beta-blocker intolerance/contraindication
Management
IV diltiazem or verapamil (non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers)
Target
HR <60 bpm
Type A dissection
Management
Emergent open surgical repair (ascending aortic graft replacement +/- aortic valve repair/replacement +/- coronary reimplantation)
Target
Perform as soon as diagnosis is confirmed
Uncomplicated Type B
Management
Medical management alone: IV antihypertensives, pain control, serial imaging
Target
Long-term oral beta-blocker, SBP <130 mmHg
Complicated Type B
Management
Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) preferred over open surgery
Target
Indications: malperfusion, rupture, refractory pain, rapid expansion
Long-term (all survivors)
Management
Oral beta-blocker, aggressive BP control (SBP <130 mmHg), serial CTA or MRA surveillance (at 1, 3, 6, 12 months, then annually)
Target
Prevent false lumen expansion and recurrence
Scenario | Management | Target |
|---|---|---|
All patients (immediate) | IV beta-blocker first: Esmolol (preferred: 500 mcg/kg bolus, then 50-200 mcg/kg/min infusion) or Labetalol (20 mg IV bolus, then 1-2 mg/min infusion) | HR <60 bpm, SBP 100-120 mmHg |
If BP remains elevated after beta-blockade | Add IV sodium nitroprusside (0.25-10 mcg/kg/min) ONLY after adequate beta-blockade is established | SBP 100-120 mmHg |
Beta-blocker intolerance/contraindication | IV diltiazem or verapamil (non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers) | HR <60 bpm |
Type A dissection | Emergent open surgical repair (ascending aortic graft replacement +/- aortic valve repair/replacement +/- coronary reimplantation) | Perform as soon as diagnosis is confirmed |
Uncomplicated Type B | Medical management alone: IV antihypertensives, pain control, serial imaging | Long-term oral beta-blocker, SBP <130 mmHg |
Complicated Type B | Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) preferred over open surgery | Indications: malperfusion, rupture, refractory pain, rapid expansion |
Long-term (all survivors) | Oral beta-blocker, aggressive BP control (SBP <130 mmHg), serial CTA or MRA surveillance (at 1, 3, 6, 12 months, then annually) | Prevent false lumen expansion and recurrence |
Step 1: Acute Stabilization ("HR Before BP")
The single most important initial intervention is heart rate control with IV beta-blockers. This is the "next best step" in virtually every exam vignette presenting an acute dissection. The rationale is that reducing the heart rate decreases the rate of rise of aortic pressure (), which is the primary force propagating the dissection. Simply lowering blood pressure without first controlling heart rate (for example, using a vasodilator alone) causes reflex tachycardia, which paradoxically increases and worsens the dissection.
Esmolol is the preferred agent because of its ultra-short half-life (~9 minutes), allowing rapid titration.
Labetalol is an acceptable alternative (combined alpha-beta blockade).
Target: HR <60 bpm, then SBP 100-120 mmHg.
Step 2: Add Vasodilator If Needed
If blood pressure remains elevated despite adequate beta-blockade, sodium nitroprusside can be added. The critical rule: never give nitroprusside before establishing beta-blockade, because nitroprusside alone causes reflex tachycardia. Nitroprusside toxicity (cyanide accumulation) is a concern with prolonged infusions (>48-72 hours).
An alternative if nitroprusside is contraindicated (e.g., renal insufficiency, prolonged use) is IV nicardipine (5-15 mg/hr), which does not cause reflex tachycardia to the same degree.
Step 3: Pain Control
IV morphine is used for pain management. Pain relief is not merely comfort care; uncontrolled pain triggers sympathetic activation, raising heart rate and blood pressure, which worsens the dissection. Adequate analgesia is part of hemodynamic management.
Step 4: Definitive Treatment Based on Classification
Type A: Proceed directly to emergent open surgical repair. There is no role for "watchful waiting" in Type A; without surgery, mortality approaches 50% at 48 hours. Surgery involves replacing the affected ascending aorta with a synthetic graft (Dacron). If the aortic root is involved, a composite valve-graft (Bentall procedure) may be required.
Uncomplicated Type B: Continue medical therapy. These patients are monitored with serial imaging. The false lumen may thrombose and remodel over time. Elective TEVAR may be considered in subacute/chronic settings to promote favorable remodeling.
Complicated Type B (defined by malperfusion of any end-organ, rupture or impending rupture, refractory hypertension, persistent/recurrent pain, or rapid aortic expansion): TEVAR is the preferred intervention. TEVAR involves endovascular placement of a covered stent-graft over the primary intimal tear to redirect flow into the true lumen.
Step 5: Long-Term Management
All survivors require lifelong oral beta-blocker therapy, aggressive blood pressure control (goal SBP <130 mmHg), and surveillance imaging with CTA or MRA. Patients with Marfan syndrome may benefit from losartan (ARB) in addition to beta-blockers, as evidence suggests it slows aortic root dilation through TGF-beta pathway modulation. Patients should avoid isometric exercise, heavy lifting, and stimulant drugs.
Contraindications and Special Populations:
Pregnancy: Dissection occurs most often in the third trimester (hormonally mediated changes in the aortic wall). Management principles are the same; labetalol is preferred over esmolol. Nitroprusside should be avoided due to fetal cyanide toxicity. Emergent delivery (usually cesarean) may be needed before or concurrent with aortic repair.
Cocaine-associated dissection: Avoid pure beta-blockers initially (risk of unopposed alpha stimulation); use labetalol (alpha-beta blocker) or a combination of phentolamine (alpha-blocker) plus a beta-blocker. Benzodiazepines are also used.
05Differential Diagnosis & Distractors
Acute Myocardial Infarction (STEMI)
Why It Is Similar
Acute chest pain, diaphoresis, hemodynamic instability; dissection into the RCA can even produce inferior ST elevation
Key Discriminator
Dissection pain is tearing, radiating to the back, maximal at onset; MI pain is pressure/squeezing, crescendo pattern. Look for BP discrepancy between arms and widened mediastinum (absent in primary MI). A young patient with Marfan features or cocaine use with an inferior STEMI should raise concern for dissection before giving thrombolytics.
Pulmonary Embolism (PE)
Why It Is Similar
Acute chest pain, dyspnea, tachycardia, hypotension, elevated D-dimer
Key Discriminator
PE presents with pleuritic chest pain (worse with breathing), prominent dyspnea disproportionate to chest pain, and risk factors such as immobility, DVT, or recent surgery. PE will not produce BP discrepancy or widened mediastinum. CTA for PE shows filling defects in pulmonary arteries, not an intimal flap in the aorta.
Acute Pericarditis
Why It Is Similar
Chest pain that may radiate to the back, possible pericardial effusion on imaging
Key Discriminator
Pericarditis pain is sharp, pleuritic, relieved by sitting forward. ECG shows diffuse ST elevation with PR depression (not localized like STEMI). No BP discrepancy or pulse deficit.
Cardiac Tamponade
Why It Is Similar
Hypotension, elevated JVP, muffled heart sounds; tamponade can be a complication of dissection
Key Discriminator
Primary tamponade (e.g., from uremia, malignancy, or viral pericarditis) will not have tearing back pain, BP discrepancy, or widened mediastinum. If tamponade + tearing chest pain = suspect dissection rupture into the pericardium.
Esophageal Rupture (Boerhaave Syndrome)
Why It Is Similar
Sudden, severe chest/back pain, widened mediastinum on CXR (from pneumomediastinum)
Key Discriminator
History of forceful vomiting or retching preceding the pain. CXR may show pneumomediastinum or left pleural effusion (from esophageal contents), not a true aortic contour abnormality. Diagnosis confirmed with water-soluble contrast esophagram (Gastrografin swallow).
Musculoskeletal Chest Pain
Why It Is Similar
Back pain, especially in younger patients
Key Discriminator
Reproducible with palpation, no hemodynamic instability, normal imaging. No tearing quality, no radiation pattern, no pulse deficits.
Acute Mesenteric Ischemia
Why It Is Similar
Abdominal pain, lactic acidosis (if dissection causes mesenteric malperfusion)
Key Discriminator
Primary mesenteric ischemia occurs in patients with atrial fibrillation (embolic) or atherosclerotic disease. It presents with "pain out of proportion to exam." If a patient has both back pain and abdominal pain with signs of malperfusion, think dissection extending into the mesenteric vessels.
Differential | Why It Is Similar | Key Discriminator |
|---|---|---|
Acute Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) | Acute chest pain, diaphoresis, hemodynamic instability; dissection into the RCA can even produce inferior ST elevation | Dissection pain is tearing, radiating to the back, maximal at onset; MI pain is pressure/squeezing, crescendo pattern. Look for BP discrepancy between arms and widened mediastinum (absent in primary MI). A young patient with Marfan features or cocaine use with an inferior STEMI should raise concern for dissection before giving thrombolytics. |
Pulmonary Embolism (PE) | Acute chest pain, dyspnea, tachycardia, hypotension, elevated D-dimer | PE presents with pleuritic chest pain (worse with breathing), prominent dyspnea disproportionate to chest pain, and risk factors such as immobility, DVT, or recent surgery. PE will not produce BP discrepancy or widened mediastinum. CTA for PE shows filling defects in pulmonary arteries, not an intimal flap in the aorta. |
Acute Pericarditis | Chest pain that may radiate to the back, possible pericardial effusion on imaging | Pericarditis pain is sharp, pleuritic, relieved by sitting forward. ECG shows diffuse ST elevation with PR depression (not localized like STEMI). No BP discrepancy or pulse deficit. |
Cardiac Tamponade | Hypotension, elevated JVP, muffled heart sounds; tamponade can be a complication of dissection | Primary tamponade (e.g., from uremia, malignancy, or viral pericarditis) will not have tearing back pain, BP discrepancy, or widened mediastinum. If tamponade + tearing chest pain = suspect dissection rupture into the pericardium. |
Esophageal Rupture (Boerhaave Syndrome) | Sudden, severe chest/back pain, widened mediastinum on CXR (from pneumomediastinum) | History of forceful vomiting or retching preceding the pain. CXR may show pneumomediastinum or left pleural effusion (from esophageal contents), not a true aortic contour abnormality. Diagnosis confirmed with water-soluble contrast esophagram (Gastrografin swallow). |
Musculoskeletal Chest Pain | Back pain, especially in younger patients | Reproducible with palpation, no hemodynamic instability, normal imaging. No tearing quality, no radiation pattern, no pulse deficits. |
Acute Mesenteric Ischemia | Abdominal pain, lactic acidosis (if dissection causes mesenteric malperfusion) | Primary mesenteric ischemia occurs in patients with atrial fibrillation (embolic) or atherosclerotic disease. It presents with "pain out of proportion to exam." If a patient has both back pain and abdominal pain with signs of malperfusion, think dissection extending into the mesenteric vessels. |
06Traps and High-Yield Pearls
The single most dangerous trap on exam questions about aortic dissection is giving thrombolytics or heparin to a patient who appears to be having an acute MI but is actually having a dissection. The vignette will describe a patient, often younger than the typical MI demographic, with "chest pain" and inferior ST elevation on ECG. Embedded in the stem will be subtle clues: the pain is tearing, started suddenly at full intensity, radiates to the back, or there is a blood pressure difference between arms. If you miss these clues and select "administer tPA" or "give heparin and proceed to catheterization," the result is catastrophic hemorrhage into the false lumen or pericardium. Always scan for dissection red flags before choosing thrombolysis.
A second common trap involves the sequencing of antihypertensive therapy. Students frequently select nitroprusside or another vasodilator as the first-line agent because they focus on the dangerously high blood pressure. The correct answer is always beta-blocker first (esmolol or labetalol). The reasoning is physiological: you must reduce by lowering heart rate before you lower afterload with a vasodilator. Giving a vasodilator first causes reflex tachycardia, increases shear stress, and propagates the dissection.
A third trap is confusing the indication for surgery versus medical management. Remember: Type A = Always surgery. Type B = Blood pressure management (unless complicated). If the vignette describes an ascending aortic dissection and asks for the "next best step in management," the answer is emergent surgical referral, even if the patient looks stable. Conversely, do not select surgery for an uncomplicated Type B dissection; medical therapy is the standard of care.
Finally, watch for vignettes featuring young patients with connective tissue disorders (tall, thin habitus, arm span exceeding height, pectus excavatum, lens subluxation = Marfan syndrome) or pregnant women in the third trimester presenting with acute-onset back pain. These are designed to test whether you can recognize dissection in atypical demographics where hypertension may not be the primary risk factor.
The core competency being tested is pattern recognition under pressure: identifying the tearing, migratory pain with pulse deficits that points to dissection, avoiding the MI mimic trap, sequencing beta-blockers before vasodilators, and routing Type A to surgery while managing uncomplicated Type B medically.