HIV/AIDS
Published on September 20, 2026
Risk Factors
Men who have sex with men (MSM), intravenous drug use (IVDU), unprotected sexual intercourse, vertical transmission (mother to child), occupational needlestick injury, blood transfusion (rare in screened supply), commercial sex workers, endemic regions (sub-Saharan Africa)
Etiology
HIV-1 (predominant worldwide) and HIV-2 (West Africa, more indolent course). Both are lentiviruses of the Retroviridae family. Transmitted via bodily fluids: blood, semen, vaginal secretions, breast milk
Presentation
Acute retroviral syndrome (2 to 6 weeks post-exposure): fever, pharyngitis, diffuse maculopapular rash, lymphadenopathy, myalgia, mucosal ulcers. May be asymptomatic for years during clinical latency. Late presentation with an AIDS-defining illness
Classic Exam
Generalized lymphadenopathy, oropharyngeal candidiasis (thrush), oral hairy leukoplakia (lateral tongue, not scraped off), Kaposi sarcoma (violaceous skin lesions), wasting, seborrheic dermatitis
Diagnostics
4th-generation HIV-1/2 antigen/antibody (Ag/Ab) combination immunoassay (screening), HIV-1/HIV-2 antibody differentiation immunoassay (confirmatory), HIV-1 RNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for acute infection or indeterminate results. CD4 count and viral load for staging and monitoring
Management
Antiretroviral therapy (ART) for all patients regardless of CD4 count or viral load, started as soon as possible after diagnosis. Preferred initial regimen: integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-based. Opportunistic infection (OI) prophylaxis based on CD4 thresholds
KEYWORDS
"Mono-like illness with negative monospot," "CD4 count less than 200," "opportunistic infection in a young patient," "generalized lymphadenopathy with weight loss," "ring-enhancing lesion," "ground-glass opacities bilateral"
01Pathophysiology
HIV is a retrovirus that carries two copies of single-stranded RNA. After entry into the host, the viral enzyme reverse transcriptase converts viral RNA into double-stranded DNA. This proviral DNA is then integrated into the host cell genome by the enzyme integrase, allowing the virus to hijack the cell's machinery for replication.
The virus enters host cells by binding its envelope glycoprotein gp120 to the CD4 receptor on the surface of T-helper lymphocytes. A second binding event occurs with a co-receptor, either CCR5 (used predominantly during early infection, macrophage-tropic strains) or CXCR4 (used in later-stage disease, T-cell-tropic strains). After fusion (mediated by gp41), the viral contents are released into the cell. Understanding these steps is critical because each one represents a pharmacologic target: CCR5 antagonists (maraviroc), fusion inhibitors (enfuvirtide), NRTIs and NNRTIs (reverse transcriptase), integrase inhibitors (dolutegravir, bictegravir), and protease inhibitors (atazanavir, darunavir).
The natural history of HIV infection progresses through three phases. The acute retroviral syndrome phase occurs 2 to 6 weeks after exposure, during which the virus replicates explosively and the viral load peaks (often exceeding copies/mL). CD4 counts drop sharply. This is why the patient develops a mononucleosis-like illness with high fever, pharyngitis, rash, and lymphadenopathy. The immune system partially controls the virus, establishing a viral set point that predicts the rate of disease progression.
During the clinical latency phase, the patient is largely asymptomatic, but the virus continues to replicate at low levels and progressively destroys CD4+ T cells at a rate of approximately 50 to 80 cells/microL per year without treatment. This phase can last 8 to 10 years.
When the CD4 count falls below 200 cells/microL, the patient meets the definition of AIDS and becomes vulnerable to opportunistic infections (OIs) and malignancies that a competent immune system would normally control. The progressive loss of cell-mediated immunity explains the entire spectrum of clinical disease: the lower the CD4 count, the more severe and unusual the infections.
02Classification and Clinical Manifestation
The clinical manifestations of HIV/AIDS are best understood by the CD4 count threshold at which each opportunistic condition typically appears. This table is extremely high-yield.
CD4 THRESHOLD | OPPORTUNISTIC CONDITIONS |
|---|---|
Any CD4 count | Tuberculosis (pulmonary or extrapulmonary), Kaposi sarcoma, lymphoma (Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin), bacterial pneumonia (recurrent), herpes zoster (recurrent/multidermatomal) |
< 500 cells/microL | Oral hairy leukoplakia, oropharyngeal candidiasis (thrush), Kaposi sarcoma, persistent generalized lymphadenopathy, constitutional symptoms (fever, weight loss, diarrhea > 1 month) |
< 200 cells/microL | Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP), progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML, caused by JC virus), esophageal candidiasis, HIV wasting syndrome, Cryptosporidium diarrhea |
< 100 cells/microL | Toxoplasma gondii encephalitis, Cryptosporidium/Microsporidium (severe chronic diarrhea), Cryptococcal meningitis |
< 50 cells/microL | Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) disseminated, Cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis, primary CNS lymphoma, disseminated histoplasmosis, disseminated coccidioidomycosis |
The CDC staging system classifies HIV by both CD4 count and clinical status:
Stage 1
CD4 COUNT (CELLS/MICROL)
>= 500
CLINICAL CRITERIA
No AIDS-defining condition
Stage 2
CD4 COUNT (CELLS/MICROL)
200 to 499
CLINICAL CRITERIA
No AIDS-defining condition
Stage 3 (AIDS)
CD4 COUNT (CELLS/MICROL)
< 200 OR presence of an AIDS-defining condition
CLINICAL CRITERIA
AIDS-defining illness regardless of CD4 count
STAGE | CD4 COUNT (CELLS/MICROL) | CLINICAL CRITERIA |
|---|---|---|
Stage 1 | >= 500 | No AIDS-defining condition |
Stage 2 | 200 to 499 | No AIDS-defining condition |
Stage 3 (AIDS) | < 200 OR presence of an AIDS-defining condition | AIDS-defining illness regardless of CD4 count |
Key AIDS-defining conditions to memorize include: PCP, Kaposi sarcoma, primary CNS lymphoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma (Burkitt, immunoblastic), invasive cervical carcinoma, CMV retinitis, esophageal candidiasis, disseminated MAC, Toxoplasma encephalitis, Cryptococcal meningitis, chronic Cryptosporidium or Isospora diarrhea (> 1 month), progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, HIV encephalopathy, and HIV wasting syndrome.
03Diagnostic Workup
4th-generation HIV-1/2 Ag/Ab combination immunoassay
ROLE
Best initial screening test
KEY DETAIL
Detects both HIV p24 antigen and HIV-1/2 antibodies. Can detect infection as early as 2 weeks post-exposure (window period shortened vs older assays)
HIV-1/HIV-2 antibody differentiation immunoassay
ROLE
Confirmatory test (replaces Western blot)
KEY DETAIL
Distinguishes HIV-1 from HIV-2 infection. Performed reflexively if the screening assay is reactive
HIV-1 RNA PCR (viral load / NAT)
ROLE
Resolves indeterminate or discordant results; detects acute infection
KEY DETAIL
Ordered when Ag/Ab is reactive but differentiation assay is negative or indeterminate (suggests very early/acute infection before antibody seroconversion)
CD4 count (absolute and percentage)
ROLE
Staging, OI prophylaxis thresholds, monitoring
KEY DETAIL
CD4 percentage < 14% corresponds to absolute CD4 < 200
HIV-1 RNA quantitative (viral load)
ROLE
Baseline and treatment monitoring
KEY DETAIL
Goal of ART is an undetectable viral load (< 20 to 50 copies/mL depending on the assay)
Genotypic resistance testing
ROLE
Guide ART selection
KEY DETAIL
Ordered at diagnosis before starting therapy and at treatment failure
HLA-B*5701 testing
ROLE
Before prescribing abacavir
KEY DETAIL
Positive result is an absolute contraindication to abacavir (risk of fatal hypersensitivity reaction)
Tropism assay (co-receptor)
ROLE
Before prescribing maraviroc
KEY DETAIL
Only effective against CCR5-tropic virus
TEST | ROLE | KEY DETAIL |
|---|---|---|
4th-generation HIV-1/2 Ag/Ab combination immunoassay | Best initial screening test | Detects both HIV p24 antigen and HIV-1/2 antibodies. Can detect infection as early as 2 weeks post-exposure (window period shortened vs older assays) |
HIV-1/HIV-2 antibody differentiation immunoassay | Confirmatory test (replaces Western blot) | Distinguishes HIV-1 from HIV-2 infection. Performed reflexively if the screening assay is reactive |
HIV-1 RNA PCR (viral load / NAT) | Resolves indeterminate or discordant results; detects acute infection | Ordered when Ag/Ab is reactive but differentiation assay is negative or indeterminate (suggests very early/acute infection before antibody seroconversion) |
CD4 count (absolute and percentage) | Staging, OI prophylaxis thresholds, monitoring | CD4 percentage < 14% corresponds to absolute CD4 < 200 |
HIV-1 RNA quantitative (viral load) | Baseline and treatment monitoring | Goal of ART is an undetectable viral load (< 20 to 50 copies/mL depending on the assay) |
Genotypic resistance testing | Guide ART selection | Ordered at diagnosis before starting therapy and at treatment failure |
HLA-B*5701 testing | Before prescribing abacavir | Positive result is an absolute contraindication to abacavir (risk of fatal hypersensitivity reaction) |
Tropism assay (co-receptor) | Before prescribing maraviroc | Only effective against CCR5-tropic virus |
The current diagnostic algorithm follows a three-step sequence. Step one is the 4th-generation Ag/Ab combination assay, which is the recommended initial screening test for all patients. If this test is reactive, the lab reflexively performs step two: the HIV-1/HIV-2 antibody differentiation immunoassay. If step two confirms HIV-1 or HIV-2 antibodies, the diagnosis is established. If step two is negative or indeterminate (which occurs in very early infection when p24 antigen is present but antibodies have not yet developed), step three is performed: an HIV-1 RNA PCR (nucleic acid test). A detectable RNA confirms acute HIV-1 infection.
The older Western blot has been removed from the recommended algorithm because it is less sensitive during acute infection and takes longer to become positive.
Baseline laboratory evaluation at diagnosis should include: CD4 count and percentage, HIV-1 RNA viral load, genotypic resistance testing, HLA-B*5701, complete blood count, comprehensive metabolic panel (including renal and hepatic function), fasting lipid panel, fasting glucose or HbA1c, urinalysis, hepatitis A/B/C serologies, Toxoplasma IgG, syphilis screen (RPR or VDRL), tuberculosis screening (interferon-gamma release assay or tuberculin skin test), cervical or anal Pap smear, and pregnancy test in women of reproductive age.
A commonly tested concept: a patient presents with a mononucleosis-like syndrome (fever, pharyngitis, lymphadenopathy, rash) with a negative monospot (heterophile antibody) test. The next best step is an HIV Ag/Ab combination assay (and/or HIV RNA PCR if acute infection is strongly suspected). This is one of the most classic vignette setups.
04Management and Treatment
COMPONENT | RECOMMENDATION |
|---|---|
When to start ART | All patients with confirmed HIV, regardless of CD4 count or viral load. Start as soon as possible, ideally same day ("rapid start") |
Preferred initial regimen | INSTI-based: Bictegravir/emtricitabine/TAF (Biktarvy), 1 tablet once daily. Alternative: Dolutegravir + emtricitabine/TDF (or TAF) |
Two-drug regimen (selected patients) | Dolutegravir/lamivudine (Dovato): only if HBV-negative, HIV RNA < 500,000 copies/mL, CD4 > 200, and no resistance suspected |
Treatment goal | Undetectable viral load (< 50 copies/mL) within 24 weeks of starting ART |
Treatment failure | Defined by persistent or rebound viremia. Check adherence first, then order genotypic resistance testing and switch regimen accordingly |
Opportunistic Infection Prophylaxis
< 200 (or thrush, or CD4% < 14%)
CONDITION
PCP
PRIMARY PROPHYLAXIS
TMP-SMX DS (160/800 mg) 1 tablet daily
DISCONTINUATION CRITERIA
CD4 > 200 for >= 3 consecutive months on ART
< 100 + positive Toxoplasma IgG
CONDITION
Toxoplasmosis
PRIMARY PROPHYLAXIS
TMP-SMX DS 1 tablet daily (same drug, same dose as PCP prophylaxis)
DISCONTINUATION CRITERIA
CD4 > 200 for >= 3 consecutive months on ART
< 50
CONDITION
MAC
PRIMARY PROPHYLAXIS
Azithromycin 1200 mg once weekly
DISCONTINUATION CRITERIA
CD4 > 100 for >= 3 consecutive months on ART
CD4 THRESHOLD | CONDITION | PRIMARY PROPHYLAXIS | DISCONTINUATION CRITERIA |
|---|---|---|---|
< 200 (or thrush, or CD4% < 14%) | PCP | TMP-SMX DS (160/800 mg) 1 tablet daily | CD4 > 200 for >= 3 consecutive months on ART |
< 100 + positive Toxoplasma IgG | Toxoplasmosis | TMP-SMX DS 1 tablet daily (same drug, same dose as PCP prophylaxis) | CD4 > 200 for >= 3 consecutive months on ART |
< 50 | MAC | Azithromycin 1200 mg once weekly | CD4 > 100 for >= 3 consecutive months on ART |
Alternatives for patients with sulfonamide allergy (unable to take TMP-SMX): dapsone 100 mg daily (check G6PD first), atovaquone 1500 mg daily with food, or aerosolized pentamidine 300 mg once monthly via nebulizer (for PCP only, does not cover Toxoplasma).
ART Principles
ART regimens consist of a backbone (two nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors, or NRTIs) combined with a third agent (an INSTI, a boosted protease inhibitor, or an NNRTI). Current guidelines strongly favor INSTI-based regimens due to high efficacy, high barrier to resistance (for dolutegravir and bictegravir), good tolerability, and few drug interactions.
The most commonly tested backbone combinations are emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (TAF). TDF is associated with nephrotoxicity and decreased bone mineral density. TAF has improved renal and bone safety but may increase lipids. An alternative backbone is abacavir/lamivudine, but this requires a negative HLA-B*5701 result and should be avoided in patients with high cardiovascular risk.
Exceptions to Immediate ART Initiation
In certain OIs, starting ART too quickly risks immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS), a paradoxical worsening of symptoms as the recovering immune system mounts an inflammatory response against residual pathogen antigens. The key exceptions are:
CONDITION | TIMING OF ART INITIATION |
|---|---|
Cryptococcal meningitis | Delay ART 4 to 6 weeks (highest IRIS risk, can be fatal) |
TB meningitis | Delay ART 2 to 8 weeks |
Pulmonary TB (non-CNS) | Start ART within 2 weeks (if CD4 < 50) or within 8 weeks |
CMV retinitis | Start ART within 2 weeks |
PCP | Start ART within 2 weeks |
Prevention: Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP)
Emtricitabine/TDF (Truvada)
DOSING
1 tablet daily
NOTES
Effective for all exposure routes. Check renal function and HBV status before starting
Emtricitabine/TAF (Descovy)
DOSING
1 tablet daily
NOTES
Not approved for receptive vaginal sex (insufficient data)
Cabotegravir (Apretude)
DOSING
IM injection every 2 months (after oral lead-in or 2 loading injections 1 month apart)
NOTES
Long-acting injectable option
REGIMEN | DOSING | NOTES |
|---|---|---|
Emtricitabine/TDF (Truvada) | 1 tablet daily | Effective for all exposure routes. Check renal function and HBV status before starting |
Emtricitabine/TAF (Descovy) | 1 tablet daily | Not approved for receptive vaginal sex (insufficient data) |
Cabotegravir (Apretude) | IM injection every 2 months (after oral lead-in or 2 loading injections 1 month apart) | Long-acting injectable option |
Prevention: Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (PEP)
PEP must be initiated within 72 hours of exposure and continued for 28 days. The preferred regimen is emtricitabine/TDF + dolutegravir (or raltegravir). Baseline HIV testing of the exposed individual is required before starting PEP, and follow-up testing is done at 4 to 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months.
Pregnancy
ART should be continued (or initiated) in all pregnant women with HIV. Preferred regimens include dolutegravir-based combinations (now considered safe throughout pregnancy per updated guidelines, though earlier concerns about neural tube defects at periconception led to caution). Efavirenz should be avoided (teratogenicity). If the maternal viral load is > 1000 copies/mL (or unknown) near delivery, intravenous zidovudine is administered during labor. The newborn receives zidovudine syrup for 4 to 6 weeks (and additional agents if the mother's viral load was not suppressed). In resource-rich settings, breastfeeding is avoided due to the risk of transmission. Cesarean delivery is recommended if viral load is > 1000 copies/mL at 38 weeks.
05Differential Diagnosis and Distractors
Infectious mononucleosis (EBV)
WHY IT IS SIMILAR
Fever, pharyngitis, lymphadenopathy, fatigue, rash (especially if amoxicillin given). Nearly identical to acute retroviral syndrome
KEY DISCRIMINATOR
Positive heterophile antibody (monospot) rules in EBV. The classic vignette for acute HIV is a mono-like illness with a negative monospot. Also, HIV rash is more diffuse and involves palms/soles; EBV rash typically follows amoxicillin exposure
Secondary syphilis
WHY IT IS SIMILAR
Diffuse maculopapular rash involving palms and soles, lymphadenopathy, mucosal patches, constitutional symptoms
KEY DISCRIMINATOR
Positive RPR/VDRL with confirmatory FTA-ABS. Condylomata lata (moist, flat, gray-white lesions in intertriginous areas) and history of a preceding painless chancre point to syphilis. Note: co-infection with HIV is common, so always test for both
Acute CMV infection
WHY IT IS SIMILAR
Fever, lymphadenopathy, atypical lymphocytes, negative monospot (like HIV). Hepatosplenomegaly more prominent
KEY DISCRIMINATOR
CMV IgM positive or CMV PCR positive. CMV tends to cause more prominent hepatitis (elevated transaminases) and has no pharyngitis or rash, unlike acute HIV
Toxoplasmosis (reactivation)
WHY IT IS SIMILAR
Ring-enhancing brain lesion on imaging, fever, altered mental status, in an immunosuppressed patient
KEY DISCRIMINATOR
Toxoplasmosis lesions are multiple, located in the basal ganglia, and respond to empiric therapy (pyrimethamine + sulfadiazine). Primary CNS lymphoma is the main alternative: typically a single, periventricular ring-enhancing lesion, positive CSF EBV PCR, and no response to empiric Toxoplasma therapy. Obtain brain biopsy if no improvement
PCP (Pneumocystis pneumonia) vs other causes of bilateral infiltrates
WHY IT IS SIMILAR
Bilateral ground-glass opacities on CT, dyspnea, hypoxia, dry cough in an immunosuppressed patient
KEY DISCRIMINATOR
PCP classically shows an elevated LDH and an increased A-a gradient (). Induced sputum with silver stain (or bronchoalveolar lavage) showing cysts or trophozoites is diagnostic. The key discriminator from bacterial pneumonia is the subacute onset (days to weeks) and nonproductive cough
Drug reaction / viral exanthem
WHY IT IS SIMILAR
Diffuse rash, fever, malaise
KEY DISCRIMINATOR
Lacks the characteristic combination of pharyngitis + lymphadenopathy + mucosal ulcers. No identifiable drug exposure timeline. Always consider acute HIV in any patient with risk factors presenting with an unexplained febrile illness and rash
DIFFERENTIAL | WHY IT IS SIMILAR | KEY DISCRIMINATOR |
|---|---|---|
Infectious mononucleosis (EBV) | Fever, pharyngitis, lymphadenopathy, fatigue, rash (especially if amoxicillin given). Nearly identical to acute retroviral syndrome | Positive heterophile antibody (monospot) rules in EBV. The classic vignette for acute HIV is a mono-like illness with a negative monospot. Also, HIV rash is more diffuse and involves palms/soles; EBV rash typically follows amoxicillin exposure |
Secondary syphilis | Diffuse maculopapular rash involving palms and soles, lymphadenopathy, mucosal patches, constitutional symptoms | Positive RPR/VDRL with confirmatory FTA-ABS. Condylomata lata (moist, flat, gray-white lesions in intertriginous areas) and history of a preceding painless chancre point to syphilis. Note: co-infection with HIV is common, so always test for both |
Acute CMV infection | Fever, lymphadenopathy, atypical lymphocytes, negative monospot (like HIV). Hepatosplenomegaly more prominent | CMV IgM positive or CMV PCR positive. CMV tends to cause more prominent hepatitis (elevated transaminases) and has no pharyngitis or rash, unlike acute HIV |
Toxoplasmosis (reactivation) | Ring-enhancing brain lesion on imaging, fever, altered mental status, in an immunosuppressed patient | Toxoplasmosis lesions are multiple, located in the basal ganglia, and respond to empiric therapy (pyrimethamine + sulfadiazine). Primary CNS lymphoma is the main alternative: typically a single, periventricular ring-enhancing lesion, positive CSF EBV PCR, and no response to empiric Toxoplasma therapy. Obtain brain biopsy if no improvement |
PCP (Pneumocystis pneumonia) vs other causes of bilateral infiltrates | Bilateral ground-glass opacities on CT, dyspnea, hypoxia, dry cough in an immunosuppressed patient | PCP classically shows an elevated LDH and an increased A-a gradient (). Induced sputum with silver stain (or bronchoalveolar lavage) showing cysts or trophozoites is diagnostic. The key discriminator from bacterial pneumonia is the subacute onset (days to weeks) and nonproductive cough |
Drug reaction / viral exanthem | Diffuse rash, fever, malaise | Lacks the characteristic combination of pharyngitis + lymphadenopathy + mucosal ulcers. No identifiable drug exposure timeline. Always consider acute HIV in any patient with risk factors presenting with an unexplained febrile illness and rash |
06Traps and High-Yield Pearls
The single most commonly tested "gotcha" in HIV questions is failing to recognize acute retroviral syndrome. The vignette will describe a young, sexually active patient presenting with a mononucleosis-like illness (fever, pharyngitis, lymphadenopathy, diffuse rash) and a negative monospot test. Many students instinctively select EBV or another viral syndrome and move on. The correct next step is to order an HIV Ag/Ab combination assay (or HIV RNA if acute infection is strongly suspected and antibody tests may still be negative). Remember: the monospot being negative is the signal, not a throwaway detail.
Another frequent trap involves when to start ART in the setting of an opportunistic infection. Students often default to "start ART immediately in everyone." While this is generally true, cryptococcal meningitis is the critical exception. Starting ART too early in cryptococcal meningitis causes severe, potentially fatal IRIS (paradoxical clinical worsening due to immune reconstitution). The correct answer is to treat the cryptococcal infection first (amphotericin B + flucytosine induction, then fluconazole consolidation) and delay ART for 4 to 6 weeks.
A third trap involves CD4-based prophylaxis thresholds. Students may confuse the cutoffs or forget that TMP-SMX at the standard dose covers both PCP and Toxoplasma prophylaxis, making it a two-for-one answer. When the CD4 falls below 50, the additional prophylaxis needed is azithromycin for MAC, which is a separate drug.
Students also miss the HLA-B*5701 testing requirement before prescribing abacavir. Failing to test leads to a potentially fatal hypersensitivity reaction. If the vignette mentions a new ART regimen containing abacavir and the patient develops fever, rash, GI symptoms, and respiratory complaints within the first 6 weeks, think abacavir hypersensitivity. The drug must be permanently discontinued and never rechallenged.
Finally, recognize that the "U = U" (Undetectable = Untransmittable) principle is testable. A patient on stable ART with a consistently undetectable viral load (< 200 copies/mL for >= 6 months) has effectively no risk of sexual transmission. This concept is important for counseling-based questions.
The core competency being tested across HIV/AIDS questions is threefold: (1) pattern recognition of acute and chronic presentations, (2) correct sequencing of the diagnostic algorithm (screening, then confirmatory, then RNA if needed), and (3) management logic, particularly around when to start ART, which prophylaxis corresponds to which CD4 threshold, and which drugs require pre-treatment testing (HLA-B*5701 for abacavir, G6PD for dapsone, co-receptor tropism for maraviroc).