Kardiomiopati
Published on September 21, 2026
Risk Factors
Dilated (DCM)
Alcohol use, viral myocarditis (Coxsackie B), peripartum, doxorubicin/adriamycin use, cocaine, Chagas disease, familial
Hypertrophic (HCM)
Young athletes, family history of sudden cardiac death, autosomal dominant inheritance
Restrictive (RCM)
Amyloidosis, sarcoidosis, hemochromatosis, radiation therapy, endomyocardial fibrosis (hypereosinophilic syndrome)
Etiology
Dilated (DCM)
Progressive myocyte damage leading to chamber dilation and systolic failure
Hypertrophic (HCM)
Sarcomere gene mutation (beta-myosin heavy chain) causing asymmetric septal hypertrophy
Restrictive (RCM)
Infiltrative or fibrotic processes that stiffen the ventricular wall, impairing diastolic filling
Presentation
Dilated (DCM)
Gradual-onset dyspnea on exertion, orthopnea, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea, lower extremity edema
Hypertrophic (HCM)
Exertional syncope or presyncope in a young person; dyspnea on exertion; sudden cardiac death during exercise
Restrictive (RCM)
Progressive exercise intolerance with signs of right-sided heart failure (JVD, ascites, peripheral edema)
Classic Exam
Dilated (DCM)
Displaced PMI, S3 gallop, bilateral crackles, elevated JVP, peripheral edema
Hypertrophic (HCM)
Harsh systolic crescendo-decrescendo murmur at the left lower sternal border that increases with Valsalva and standing, decreases with squatting and leg elevation; bifid carotid pulse ("spike and dome")
Restrictive (RCM)
Kussmaul sign (JVP rises with inspiration), S4 gallop, hepatomegaly, ascites out of proportion to pulmonary congestion
Diagnostics
Dilated (DCM)
Echo: 4-chamber dilation, EF < 40%, global hypokinesis; CXR: cardiomegaly with pulmonary congestion; BNP elevated
Hypertrophic (HCM)
Echo: asymmetric septal hypertrophy (septum > 15 mm), systolic anterior motion (SAM) of the mitral valve, dynamic LVOT gradient; ECG: LVH, deep Q waves in lateral leads
Restrictive (RCM)
Echo: biatrial enlargement, normal-to-near-normal EF, thickened ventricular walls (if infiltrative), diastolic dysfunction; "sparkling" myocardium in amyloidosis
Management
Dilated (DCM)
Standard heart failure therapy: ACE inhibitor/ARB + beta-blocker + diuretics + aldosterone antagonist; ICD if EF remains below 35%
Hypertrophic (HCM)
Beta-blocker or non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (verapamil); avoid vasodilators, digoxin, and high-intensity exercise; ICD for high-risk patients or family history of sudden death
Restrictive (RCM)
Treat the underlying cause (phlebotomy for hemochromatosis, steroids for sarcoidosis, chemotherapy for amyloidosis); diuretics for volume overload; heart transplant in refractory cases
Keywords
Dilated (DCM)
"Balloon heart," "dilated chambers," "S3 gallop," "systolic dysfunction," "reduced ejection fraction"
Hypertrophic (HCM)
"Young athlete," "sudden death during exercise," "murmur louder with Valsalva," "septal hypertrophy," "SAM"
Restrictive (RCM)
"Stiff heart," "diastolic dysfunction with preserved EF," "Kussmaul sign," "apple-green birefringence" (amyloid), "sparkling myocardium"
01Pathophysiology
Dilated Cardiomyopathy (DCM)
DCM is the most common form of cardiomyopathy and the leading indication for heart transplantation. The core defect is progressive destruction or dysfunction of myocytes, which leads to eccentric hypertrophy: the ventricle dilates to compensate for reduced contractile force. As the chamber expands, wall stress increases according to the Law of Laplace (), creating a vicious cycle where dilation raises wall stress, which worsens contractile efficiency, which triggers further dilation.
The most tested etiologies include viral myocarditis (Coxsackie B virus is the classic association), chronic alcohol use (direct toxic effect on myocytes), peripartum cardiomyopathy (last trimester through 5 months postpartum), doxorubicin (anthracycline chemotherapy causing dose-dependent irreversible damage), and Chagas disease (Trypanosoma cruzi, tested in patients from Central and South America). The downstream physiology is that of systolic heart failure: the heart cannot generate adequate forward output, leading to pulmonary congestion (dyspnea, orthopnea) and systemic venous congestion (peripheral edema, hepatomegaly). The S3 gallop you hear on exam reflects rapid passive filling into a volume-overloaded, floppy ventricle.
Stasis of blood in a poorly contracting, dilated chamber also predisposes to mural thrombus formation, which can embolize and cause stroke. This is why you will see questions about anticoagulation in DCM patients, particularly those with very low ejection fractions.
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM)
HCM is the most common cause of sudden cardiac death in young athletes. This sentence alone accounts for a large percentage of how this disease is tested. The inheritance pattern is autosomal dominant with variable penetrance. The most commonly tested mutation is in the beta-myosin heavy chain gene on chromosome 14.
The pathology is asymmetric septal hypertrophy, where the interventricular septum grows disproportionately thick compared to the free wall. This thickened septum narrows the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT). During systole, high-velocity blood flowing through the narrowed LVOT creates a Venturi effect that pulls the anterior leaflet of the mitral valve toward the septum. This phenomenon is called systolic anterior motion (SAM), and it is both the hallmark echocardiographic finding and the mechanism behind the dynamic outflow obstruction.
Understanding the physiology of the obstruction is essential for answering management questions. Anything that decreases left ventricular volume (dehydration, Valsalva maneuver, standing up suddenly, exercise, vasodilators) worsens the obstruction because the septum and mitral leaflet are brought closer together. Conversely, anything that increases left ventricular volume (squatting, leg elevation, IV fluids) or increases afterload (phenylephrine) separates these structures and reduces obstruction. This is the single most tested concept in HCM.
The murmur is a harsh, crescendo-decrescendo systolic murmur best heard at the left lower sternal border. It is the only common murmur that increases with Valsalva (most murmurs decrease). On ECG, you may see LVH with deep, narrow Q waves in the lateral and inferior leads, which represent septal depolarization and are sometimes called "dagger Q waves."
The mechanism of sudden death is a ventricular arrhythmia (ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation) triggered by the disorganized myocyte architecture ("myocardial disarray") within the hypertrophied septum. This is why competitive sports are prohibited and ICD placement is considered in high-risk patients.
Restrictive Cardiomyopathy (RCM)
RCM is the least common of the three. The ventricle has normal (or near-normal) systolic function but is abnormally stiff, impairing diastolic filling. The heart can squeeze but cannot relax properly. This means the ejection fraction is preserved, but filling pressures are elevated.
The stiffness is caused by infiltration or fibrosis of the myocardium. Amyloidosis is the most commonly tested etiology: misfolded proteins deposit in the myocardial interstitium, making the walls rigid. On echocardiography, amyloid deposits produce a characteristic "sparkling" or "granular" appearance of the myocardium. On tissue biopsy, amyloid stains with Congo red and shows apple-green birefringence under polarized light, a classic buzzword.
Other important causes include sarcoidosis (non-caseating granulomas infiltrating the myocardium, which can also cause conduction abnormalities and arrhythmias), hemochromatosis (iron deposition, classically presenting with the triad of cirrhosis, diabetes, and skin hyperpigmentation), and radiation therapy (fibrosis from prior chest radiation, often years after treatment for lymphoma or breast cancer).
Because the stiff ventricle cannot accommodate venous return, patients develop elevated right-sided filling pressures early. This is why ascites, peripheral edema, and JVD often dominate the presentation before pulmonary symptoms become severe. The Kussmaul sign (paradoxical rise in JVP during inspiration, when it should normally fall) reflects the inability of the stiff right ventricle to accept the increased venous return that inspiration generates. This sign is also seen in constrictive pericarditis, which is the main differential.
02Classification and Clinical Manifestation
Classification by Pathophysiology
Dilated
Primary Defect
Systolic dysfunction (impaired contractility)
Chamber Changes
All 4 chambers dilated, thin walls
Ejection Fraction
Reduced (< 40%)
Dominant Failure Pattern
Biventricular (left > right)
Hypertrophic
Primary Defect
Diastolic dysfunction + dynamic outflow obstruction
Chamber Changes
Asymmetric septal hypertrophy, small LV cavity
Ejection Fraction
Normal or supranormal
Dominant Failure Pattern
Diastolic with outflow obstruction
Restrictive
Primary Defect
Diastolic dysfunction (impaired compliance)
Chamber Changes
Normal-sized ventricles, biatrial enlargement
Ejection Fraction
Normal or mildly reduced
Dominant Failure Pattern
Right-sided predominance
Type | Primary Defect | Chamber Changes | Ejection Fraction | Dominant Failure Pattern |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Dilated | Systolic dysfunction (impaired contractility) | All 4 chambers dilated, thin walls | Reduced (< 40%) | Biventricular (left > right) |
Hypertrophic | Diastolic dysfunction + dynamic outflow obstruction | Asymmetric septal hypertrophy, small LV cavity | Normal or supranormal | Diastolic with outflow obstruction |
Restrictive | Diastolic dysfunction (impaired compliance) | Normal-sized ventricles, biatrial enlargement | Normal or mildly reduced | Right-sided predominance |
Clinical Manifestation by Subtype
Dyspnea on exertion
Dilated
+++
Hypertrophic
++
Restrictive
++
Orthopnea / PND
Dilated
+++
Hypertrophic
+
Restrictive
+
Syncope / presyncope
Dilated
+ (low output)
Hypertrophic
+++ (outflow obstruction or arrhythmia)
Restrictive
+
Sudden cardiac death
Dilated
+ (arrhythmia from remodeling)
Hypertrophic
+++ (leading cause in young athletes)
Restrictive
+ (conduction disease in sarcoid/amyloid)
Chest pain
Dilated
+ (demand ischemia)
Hypertrophic
++ (subendocardial ischemia from hypertrophy)
Restrictive
Rare
Peripheral edema / ascites
Dilated
++
Hypertrophic
Rare
Restrictive
+++
Systemic embolism
Dilated
++ (mural thrombus)
Hypertrophic
+
Restrictive
+
Kussmaul sign
Dilated
Absent
Hypertrophic
Absent
Restrictive
Present
S3 gallop
Dilated
Present
Hypertrophic
Absent
Restrictive
Absent
S4 gallop
Dilated
Absent/variable
Hypertrophic
Present
Restrictive
Present
Murmur
Dilated
Mitral regurgitation (functional)
Hypertrophic
Crescendo-decrescendo at LLSB, dynamic
Restrictive
Usually absent
Clinical Feature | Dilated | Hypertrophic | Restrictive |
|---|---|---|---|
Dyspnea on exertion | +++ | ++ | ++ |
Orthopnea / PND | +++ | + | + |
Syncope / presyncope | + (low output) | +++ (outflow obstruction or arrhythmia) | + |
Sudden cardiac death | + (arrhythmia from remodeling) | +++ (leading cause in young athletes) | + (conduction disease in sarcoid/amyloid) |
Chest pain | + (demand ischemia) | ++ (subendocardial ischemia from hypertrophy) | Rare |
Peripheral edema / ascites | ++ | Rare | +++ |
Systemic embolism | ++ (mural thrombus) | + | + |
Kussmaul sign | Absent | Absent | Present |
S3 gallop | Present | Absent | Absent |
S4 gallop | Absent/variable | Present | Present |
Murmur | Mitral regurgitation (functional) | Crescendo-decrescendo at LLSB, dynamic | Usually absent |
Additional Cardiomyopathy Subtypes Tested in Vignettes
Takotsubo (Stress Cardiomyopathy)
Key Vignette Clue
Postmenopausal woman with acute chest pain after severe emotional or physical stress; mimics STEMI but coronary angiography is normal; "apical ballooning" on ventriculography
Mechanism
Catecholamine surge causing transient myocardial stunning
Peripartum Cardiomyopathy
Key Vignette Clue
Heart failure developing in the last month of pregnancy through 5 months postpartum in a previously healthy woman
Mechanism
Unclear; likely multifactorial (hormonal, immunologic, genetic)
Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy (ARVC)
Key Vignette Clue
Young patient with syncope or sudden death during exercise; ECG shows epsilon waves and T-wave inversions in V1-V3; RV dilation with fibrofatty replacement
Mechanism
Desmosome gene mutations leading to fibrofatty replacement of RV myocardium
Subtype | Key Vignette Clue | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
Takotsubo (Stress Cardiomyopathy) | Postmenopausal woman with acute chest pain after severe emotional or physical stress; mimics STEMI but coronary angiography is normal; "apical ballooning" on ventriculography | Catecholamine surge causing transient myocardial stunning |
Peripartum Cardiomyopathy | Heart failure developing in the last month of pregnancy through 5 months postpartum in a previously healthy woman | Unclear; likely multifactorial (hormonal, immunologic, genetic) |
Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy (ARVC) | Young patient with syncope or sudden death during exercise; ECG shows epsilon waves and T-wave inversions in V1-V3; RV dilation with fibrofatty replacement | Desmosome gene mutations leading to fibrofatty replacement of RV myocardium |
03Diagnostic Workup
DCM
Best Initial Test
Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE)
Most Accurate / Confirmatory Test
Endomyocardial biopsy (rarely needed; used if etiology unclear)
Supporting Studies
CXR (cardiomegaly, pulmonary congestion), BNP/NT-proBNP (elevated), ECG (nonspecific ST changes, LBBB, atrial fibrillation)
HCM
Best Initial Test
Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE)
Most Accurate / Confirmatory Test
Cardiac MRI (precise measurement of septal thickness, fibrosis assessment) or genetic testing for family screening
Supporting Studies
ECG (LVH, deep Q waves in lateral leads, possible pre-excitation), Holter monitor (for arrhythmia risk stratification)
RCM
Best Initial Test
Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE)
Most Accurate / Confirmatory Test
Endomyocardial biopsy (identifies amyloid, iron, granulomas)
Supporting Studies
Cardiac MRI (late gadolinium enhancement pattern), serum/urine protein electrophoresis and free light chains (for amyloidosis), iron studies and ferritin (for hemochromatosis), ACE level and chest CT (for sarcoidosis)
Takotsubo
Best Initial Test
ECG + troponin (mimics ACS)
Most Accurate / Confirmatory Test
Coronary angiography (normal coronaries) + left ventriculography (apical ballooning)
Supporting Studies
TTE shows apical wall motion abnormality with preserved basal function
ARVC
Best Initial Test
ECG (epsilon waves, T-wave inversions V1-V3)
Most Accurate / Confirmatory Test
Cardiac MRI (fibrofatty replacement of RV free wall)
Supporting Studies
Revised Task Force Criteria combining imaging, ECG, arrhythmia, family history, and biopsy findings
Diagnosis | Best Initial Test | Most Accurate / Confirmatory Test | Supporting Studies |
|---|---|---|---|
DCM | Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) | Endomyocardial biopsy (rarely needed; used if etiology unclear) | CXR (cardiomegaly, pulmonary congestion), BNP/NT-proBNP (elevated), ECG (nonspecific ST changes, LBBB, atrial fibrillation) |
HCM | Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) | Cardiac MRI (precise measurement of septal thickness, fibrosis assessment) or genetic testing for family screening | ECG (LVH, deep Q waves in lateral leads, possible pre-excitation), Holter monitor (for arrhythmia risk stratification) |
RCM | Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) | Endomyocardial biopsy (identifies amyloid, iron, granulomas) | Cardiac MRI (late gadolinium enhancement pattern), serum/urine protein electrophoresis and free light chains (for amyloidosis), iron studies and ferritin (for hemochromatosis), ACE level and chest CT (for sarcoidosis) |
Takotsubo | ECG + troponin (mimics ACS) | Coronary angiography (normal coronaries) + left ventriculography (apical ballooning) | TTE shows apical wall motion abnormality with preserved basal function |
ARVC | ECG (epsilon waves, T-wave inversions V1-V3) | Cardiac MRI (fibrofatty replacement of RV free wall) | Revised Task Force Criteria combining imaging, ECG, arrhythmia, family history, and biopsy findings |
Echocardiography is the best initial test for all cardiomyopathies. When a vignette describes a patient with heart failure symptoms and asks "what is the next step?", the answer is nearly always echocardiography. It provides the ejection fraction, chamber dimensions, wall thickness, valvular function, and diastolic parameters in one noninvasive study. This single test often clinches the diagnosis:
For DCM, echo reveals a globally dilated, hypokinetic LV with an EF typically below 40%. All four chambers are enlarged. You may see functional mitral regurgitation caused by annular dilation. The CXR will show cardiomegaly (cardiothoracic ratio > 0.5) and signs of pulmonary edema. BNP or NT-proBNP will be elevated and is useful for distinguishing cardiac from pulmonary causes of dyspnea. If the etiology is unclear and you need to confirm a diagnosis like myocarditis or infiltrative disease, endomyocardial biopsy is the gold standard, but it is rarely performed in practice and is only the answer when the vignette presents an unclear etiology that biopsy would resolve.
For HCM, echo shows the hallmark findings: septal wall thickness greater than 15 mm (or a septal-to-free-wall ratio greater than 1.3:1), a small LV cavity, and SAM of the mitral valve. Doppler will demonstrate a dynamic LVOT gradient that increases with provocative maneuvers. Cardiac MRI is increasingly recognized as the most accurate imaging modality because it precisely quantifies the degree of hypertrophy and can identify areas of myocardial fibrosis using late gadolinium enhancement, which correlates with arrhythmia risk. Genetic testing is used for family screening once a proband is identified, not for primary diagnosis. All first-degree relatives should be screened with echocardiography and potentially genetic testing.
For RCM, echo shows normal ventricular cavity size with biatrial enlargement and prominent diastolic dysfunction (elevated E/e' ratio). In amyloidosis, you see thickened ventricular walls with the characteristic "sparkling" appearance and often a small pericardial effusion. The findings may overlap with constrictive pericarditis (see Differential section below). Endomyocardial biopsy is the gold standard for confirming the etiology because it directly visualizes the infiltrate. For amyloidosis, biopsy shows Congo red-positive deposits with apple-green birefringence. A less invasive approach for AL amyloidosis includes serum free light chains and serum/urine protein electrophoresis. For transthyretin (ATTR) amyloidosis, technetium-99m pyrophosphate (Tc-99m PYP) nuclear scintigraphy is highly accurate and can sometimes obviate biopsy.
One important distinction to know: cardiac catheterization with simultaneous right and left heart pressure measurement can help differentiate RCM from constrictive pericarditis when imaging is inconclusive. In RCM, the LV and RV diastolic pressures are discordant (LV > RV by more than 5 mmHg) because the stiff myocardium affects the thicker left ventricle more. In constrictive pericarditis, pressures are equalized across all chambers because the rigid pericardium encases both ventricles equally.
04Management and Treatment
DCM
Acute / Initial Management
Loop diuretics (furosemide) for volume overload; vasodilators if hypertensive; inotropes (dobutamine/milrinone) if cardiogenic shock
Long-Term Management
ACE inhibitor or ARB (lisinopril 10-40 mg daily, or equivalent); beta-blocker (carvedilol 3.125-25 mg BID, metoprolol succinate 25-200 mg daily, or bisoprolol); aldosterone antagonist (spironolactone 25-50 mg daily if EF < 35%); ARNI (sacubitril/valsartan) replaces ACEi in stable patients; SGLT2 inhibitors (dapagliflozin 10 mg or empagliflozin 10 mg daily); hydralazine + isosorbide dinitrate if ACEi/ARB not tolerated
Devices / Procedures
ICD if EF remains < 35% after 3-6 months of optimal medical therapy; CRT (biventricular pacing) if EF < 35% + LBBB + QRS > 150 ms; heart transplant for refractory cases
Contraindications / Cautions
Do not start beta-blockers during acute decompensation; monitor potassium with aldosterone antagonists; ARNI must not be combined with ACEi (36-hour washout period required)
HCM
Acute / Initial Management
IV fluids and phenylephrine if hypotensive from obstruction; avoid vasodilators and inotropes
Long-Term Management
Beta-blocker (first-line; metoprolol or atenolol titrated to control symptoms); non-dihydropyridine CCB (verapamil 120-480 mg daily) if beta-blocker not tolerated; disopyramide (negative inotrope, added to beta-blocker for refractory symptoms); mavacamten (cardiac myosin inhibitor, newer agent for obstructive HCM)
Devices / Procedures
ICD if high risk for sudden death (family history of sudden death, unexplained syncope, LV wall thickness > 30 mm, nonsustained VT, abnormal BP response to exercise); septal myectomy (surgical, preferred) or alcohol septal ablation for refractory symptomatic obstruction
Contraindications / Cautions
Avoid: digoxin, dihydropyridine CCBs (nifedipine, amlodipine), vasodilators (ACEi, ARB, nitrates), dehydration, and competitive athletics
RCM
Acute / Initial Management
Diuretics cautiously for volume overload (these patients are preload-dependent; overly aggressive diuresis causes hypotension)
Long-Term Management
Treat underlying cause: Amyloidosis: tafamidis (ATTR type), chemotherapy with bortezomib-based regimens (AL type); Hemochromatosis: phlebotomy + deferoxamine; Sarcoidosis: corticosteroids (prednisone 0.5-1 mg/kg/day tapered over months), immunosuppressants if refractory
Devices / Procedures
Pacemaker if conduction disease present (common in sarcoidosis and amyloidosis); heart transplant for end-stage disease (combined heart-liver transplant may be needed in ATTR amyloidosis)
Contraindications / Cautions
Beta-blockers and CCBs are poorly tolerated (patients depend on heart rate to maintain cardiac output); digoxin binds avidly to amyloid fibrils and can cause toxicity even at "therapeutic" levels
Takotsubo
Acute / Initial Management
Supportive: beta-blockers, ACEi, diuretics as needed; avoid catecholamines
Long-Term Management
Most patients recover full LV function within weeks to months; standard HF medications are continued during recovery
Devices / Procedures
Rarely needed
Contraindications / Cautions
Avoid inotropes and catecholamines (epinephrine, norepinephrine) as they worsen the underlying catecholamine-mediated injury
Peripartum
Acute / Initial Management
Standard HF therapy with modifications for pregnancy/breastfeeding
Long-Term Management
Bromocriptine (prolactin inhibitor) has emerging evidence; standard HF regimen post-delivery
Devices / Procedures
ICD if EF remains severely reduced after recovery period (up to 6-12 months postpartum); heart transplant if refractory
Contraindications / Cautions
ACEi/ARB are contraindicated during pregnancy (teratogenic); use hydralazine + nitrates instead; warfarin is also teratogenic (use heparin/LMWH for anticoagulation during pregnancy); after delivery, standard agents can be resumed
Subtype | Acute / Initial Management | Long-Term Management | Devices / Procedures | Contraindications / Cautions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DCM | Loop diuretics (furosemide) for volume overload; vasodilators if hypertensive; inotropes (dobutamine/milrinone) if cardiogenic shock | ACE inhibitor or ARB (lisinopril 10-40 mg daily, or equivalent); beta-blocker (carvedilol 3.125-25 mg BID, metoprolol succinate 25-200 mg daily, or bisoprolol); aldosterone antagonist (spironolactone 25-50 mg daily if EF < 35%); ARNI (sacubitril/valsartan) replaces ACEi in stable patients; SGLT2 inhibitors (dapagliflozin 10 mg or empagliflozin 10 mg daily); hydralazine + isosorbide dinitrate if ACEi/ARB not tolerated | ICD if EF remains < 35% after 3-6 months of optimal medical therapy; CRT (biventricular pacing) if EF < 35% + LBBB + QRS > 150 ms; heart transplant for refractory cases | Do not start beta-blockers during acute decompensation; monitor potassium with aldosterone antagonists; ARNI must not be combined with ACEi (36-hour washout period required) |
HCM | IV fluids and phenylephrine if hypotensive from obstruction; avoid vasodilators and inotropes | Beta-blocker (first-line; metoprolol or atenolol titrated to control symptoms); non-dihydropyridine CCB (verapamil 120-480 mg daily) if beta-blocker not tolerated; disopyramide (negative inotrope, added to beta-blocker for refractory symptoms); mavacamten (cardiac myosin inhibitor, newer agent for obstructive HCM) | ICD if high risk for sudden death (family history of sudden death, unexplained syncope, LV wall thickness > 30 mm, nonsustained VT, abnormal BP response to exercise); septal myectomy (surgical, preferred) or alcohol septal ablation for refractory symptomatic obstruction | Avoid: digoxin, dihydropyridine CCBs (nifedipine, amlodipine), vasodilators (ACEi, ARB, nitrates), dehydration, and competitive athletics |
RCM | Diuretics cautiously for volume overload (these patients are preload-dependent; overly aggressive diuresis causes hypotension) | Treat underlying cause: Amyloidosis: tafamidis (ATTR type), chemotherapy with bortezomib-based regimens (AL type); Hemochromatosis: phlebotomy + deferoxamine; Sarcoidosis: corticosteroids (prednisone 0.5-1 mg/kg/day tapered over months), immunosuppressants if refractory | Pacemaker if conduction disease present (common in sarcoidosis and amyloidosis); heart transplant for end-stage disease (combined heart-liver transplant may be needed in ATTR amyloidosis) | Beta-blockers and CCBs are poorly tolerated (patients depend on heart rate to maintain cardiac output); digoxin binds avidly to amyloid fibrils and can cause toxicity even at "therapeutic" levels |
Takotsubo | Supportive: beta-blockers, ACEi, diuretics as needed; avoid catecholamines | Most patients recover full LV function within weeks to months; standard HF medications are continued during recovery | Rarely needed | Avoid inotropes and catecholamines (epinephrine, norepinephrine) as they worsen the underlying catecholamine-mediated injury |
Peripartum | Standard HF therapy with modifications for pregnancy/breastfeeding | Bromocriptine (prolactin inhibitor) has emerging evidence; standard HF regimen post-delivery | ICD if EF remains severely reduced after recovery period (up to 6-12 months postpartum); heart transplant if refractory | ACEi/ARB are contraindicated during pregnancy (teratogenic); use hydralazine + nitrates instead; warfarin is also teratogenic (use heparin/LMWH for anticoagulation during pregnancy); after delivery, standard agents can be resumed |
DCM: The management mirrors guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The "four pillars" of HFrEF therapy tested on exams are: (1) ACEi/ARB/ARNI, (2) beta-blocker, (3) aldosterone antagonist, and (4) SGLT2 inhibitor. Each of these has mortality benefit. Diuretics (furosemide) relieve congestion but do not improve survival. The key sequencing point: do not start beta-blockers in a patient who is acutely decompensated. Stabilize with diuretics first, then initiate and titrate beta-blockers once euvolemic. If EF remains below 35% despite 3 to 6 months of optimal therapy, an ICD is indicated for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death. If the patient also has a wide QRS (especially LBBB with QRS > 150 ms), cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) provides additional benefit.
A frequently tested scenario involves peripartum cardiomyopathy: the vignette describes a woman in the third trimester or early postpartum period with new-onset heart failure. ACE inhibitors and ARBs are absolutely contraindicated during pregnancy because of fetal renal agenesis, oligohydramnios, and other developmental defects. The "next best step" in a pregnant patient with heart failure is hydralazine plus isosorbide dinitrate for afterload reduction, along with diuretics and beta-blockers (labetalol or carvedilol are preferred). Once the patient has delivered, you can transition to standard ACEi/ARB therapy.
HCM: The treatment logic is entirely different from DCM and is a common source of errors. The goal is to reduce the dynamic LVOT obstruction by keeping the ventricle full and slowing the heart rate. Beta-blockers achieve this by (1) slowing heart rate, which prolongs diastolic filling time, and (2) reducing contractility, which decreases the force pushing the anterior mitral leaflet toward the septum. Verapamil is the second-line agent and works similarly through negative inotropy and negative chronotropy. Disopyramide is a class IA antiarrhythmic with strong negative inotropic properties and is added when beta-blockers or verapamil alone are insufficient.
The "avoid" list for HCM is heavily tested. Digoxin increases contractility and worsens obstruction. Dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (nifedipine, amlodipine) cause vasodilation and reflex tachycardia, both of which worsen obstruction. Nitrates and ACE inhibitors reduce preload and afterload, respectively, shrinking the ventricular cavity and worsening obstruction. Dehydration and strenuous exercise have the same effect through reduced preload.
For sudden death prevention, ICD implantation is the only therapy proven to prevent mortality. The standard risk factors tested include: family history of sudden cardiac death, syncope of unexplained etiology, LV wall thickness over 30 mm, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia on Holter, and abnormal blood pressure response during exercise testing.
RCM: Management is the most limited because no therapy reverses the diastolic stiffness itself. Treatment focuses on the underlying disease. The single most testable management point is that digoxin should be avoided in cardiac amyloidosis because amyloid fibrils bind digoxin with high affinity, increasing the free drug concentration and causing toxicity even at standard doses. Diuretics must be used cautiously because these patients depend on elevated filling pressures to maintain cardiac output; aggressive volume removal leads to severe hypotension.
05Differential Diagnosis and Distractors
Constrictive Pericarditis vs. Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Why It Is Similar
Both present with diastolic heart failure, elevated JVP, Kussmaul sign, and preserved systolic function
Key Discriminator
Constrictive pericarditis shows pericardial calcification on CT/CXR, septal bounce on echo, and equalized diastolic pressures on catheterization; RCM shows discordant LV > RV pressures; cardiac MRI with late gadolinium enhancement suggests infiltration (RCM) vs. thickened pericardium (constriction)
Aortic Stenosis vs. HCM
Why It Is Similar
Both cause LVH, exertional syncope, and a systolic murmur
Key Discriminator
Aortic stenosis murmur radiates to the carotids and decreases with Valsalva; HCM murmur increases with Valsalva; AS has a parvus et tardus (weak, slow-rising) carotid pulse; HCM has a bifid carotid pulse
Mitral Regurgitation vs. HCM
Why It Is Similar
Both produce a systolic murmur; HCM causes secondary MR due to SAM
Key Discriminator
MR is a holosystolic, blowing murmur at the apex radiating to the axilla; HCM is a crescendo-decrescendo murmur at the LLSB that changes with dynamic maneuvers
Myocarditis vs. DCM
Why It Is Similar
Both show dilated ventricle with reduced EF; myocarditis is actually a cause of DCM
Key Discriminator
Myocarditis has an acute onset following a viral prodrome (fever, myalgias); troponin is elevated; cardiac MRI shows myocardial edema and patchy mid-wall enhancement; DCM is a chronic, insidious process
Acute Coronary Syndrome / MI vs. Takotsubo
Why It Is Similar
Both present with chest pain, ST elevation, and troponin elevation
Key Discriminator
Takotsubo has normal coronary arteries on angiography and apical ballooning on ventriculography; troponin is only mildly elevated relative to the degree of wall motion abnormality; the patient is classically a postmenopausal woman after emotional or physical stress
Athlete's Heart vs. HCM
Why It Is Similar
Both show LVH on echo; a young athlete with LVH could be either
Key Discriminator
Athlete's heart has symmetric, proportional hypertrophy (wall thickness usually < 13 mm), a normal or enlarged LV cavity, normal diastolic function, and LVH regresses with deconditioning; HCM has asymmetric hypertrophy (> 15 mm), a small LV cavity, diastolic dysfunction, and does not regress
Cardiac Tamponade vs. RCM
Why It Is Similar
Both cause elevated JVP, dyspnea, and impaired diastolic filling
Key Discriminator
Tamponade has pulsus paradoxus (> 10 mmHg drop in systolic BP with inspiration), electrical alternans on ECG, and a large pericardial effusion on echo; RCM has Kussmaul sign, thickened/infiltrated walls, and no significant effusion
Iron-Overload Cardiomyopathy (Hemochromatosis) vs. DCM
Why It Is Similar
Both can present with dilated ventricles and reduced EF in advanced stages
Key Discriminator
Hemochromatosis classically presents with the triad of "bronze diabetes" (skin hyperpigmentation + diabetes mellitus + cirrhosis); transferrin saturation > 45% and markedly elevated ferritin; cardiac MRI shows low T2* signal reflecting iron deposition
Differential | Why It Is Similar | Key Discriminator |
|---|---|---|
Constrictive Pericarditis vs. Restrictive Cardiomyopathy | Both present with diastolic heart failure, elevated JVP, Kussmaul sign, and preserved systolic function | Constrictive pericarditis shows pericardial calcification on CT/CXR, septal bounce on echo, and equalized diastolic pressures on catheterization; RCM shows discordant LV > RV pressures; cardiac MRI with late gadolinium enhancement suggests infiltration (RCM) vs. thickened pericardium (constriction) |
Aortic Stenosis vs. HCM | Both cause LVH, exertional syncope, and a systolic murmur | Aortic stenosis murmur radiates to the carotids and decreases with Valsalva; HCM murmur increases with Valsalva; AS has a parvus et tardus (weak, slow-rising) carotid pulse; HCM has a bifid carotid pulse |
Mitral Regurgitation vs. HCM | Both produce a systolic murmur; HCM causes secondary MR due to SAM | MR is a holosystolic, blowing murmur at the apex radiating to the axilla; HCM is a crescendo-decrescendo murmur at the LLSB that changes with dynamic maneuvers |
Myocarditis vs. DCM | Both show dilated ventricle with reduced EF; myocarditis is actually a cause of DCM | Myocarditis has an acute onset following a viral prodrome (fever, myalgias); troponin is elevated; cardiac MRI shows myocardial edema and patchy mid-wall enhancement; DCM is a chronic, insidious process |
Acute Coronary Syndrome / MI vs. Takotsubo | Both present with chest pain, ST elevation, and troponin elevation | Takotsubo has normal coronary arteries on angiography and apical ballooning on ventriculography; troponin is only mildly elevated relative to the degree of wall motion abnormality; the patient is classically a postmenopausal woman after emotional or physical stress |
Athlete's Heart vs. HCM | Both show LVH on echo; a young athlete with LVH could be either | Athlete's heart has symmetric, proportional hypertrophy (wall thickness usually < 13 mm), a normal or enlarged LV cavity, normal diastolic function, and LVH regresses with deconditioning; HCM has asymmetric hypertrophy (> 15 mm), a small LV cavity, diastolic dysfunction, and does not regress |
Cardiac Tamponade vs. RCM | Both cause elevated JVP, dyspnea, and impaired diastolic filling | Tamponade has pulsus paradoxus (> 10 mmHg drop in systolic BP with inspiration), electrical alternans on ECG, and a large pericardial effusion on echo; RCM has Kussmaul sign, thickened/infiltrated walls, and no significant effusion |
Iron-Overload Cardiomyopathy (Hemochromatosis) vs. DCM | Both can present with dilated ventricles and reduced EF in advanced stages | Hemochromatosis classically presents with the triad of "bronze diabetes" (skin hyperpigmentation + diabetes mellitus + cirrhosis); transferrin saturation > 45% and markedly elevated ferritin; cardiac MRI shows low T2* signal reflecting iron deposition |
06Traps and High-Yield Pearls
The most common trap with cardiomyopathy questions is applying DCM management principles to HCM. Many students reflexively choose an ACE inhibitor or digoxin for any patient with heart failure symptoms, but in HCM, these agents worsen the outflow obstruction and can be fatal. The exam tests whether you can recognize that HCM is a fundamentally different physiology: the problem is not a weak pump (systolic failure) but a mechanical obstruction made worse by anything that reduces chamber size. If a vignette describes a young athlete with syncope, a systolic murmur that increases with Valsalva, and an echo showing asymmetric septal hypertrophy, the correct answer will never be an ACEi, a nitrate, or digoxin.
A second common error involves confusing restrictive cardiomyopathy with constrictive pericarditis. Both present nearly identically with diastolic failure, elevated JVP, and Kussmaul sign. The vignette will contain one distinguishing detail. Look for pericardial calcification or a history of prior cardiac surgery, radiation, or tuberculosis, which point toward constriction. Look for amyloidosis features (nephrotic syndrome, macroglossia, periorbital purpura), hemochromatosis clues (bronze skin, diabetes, cirrhosis), or sarcoidosis hints (bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy, erythema nodosum) to identify a restrictive process.
A third tested concept is the murmur behavior in HCM. Most systolic murmurs decrease with Valsalva because the reduced venous return lowers the volume of blood crossing the valve. HCM is the critical exception: Valsalva reduces LV volume, worsening obstruction, making the murmur louder. The only other murmur that increases with Valsalva is the click/murmur of mitral valve prolapse (the click moves earlier and the murmur lengthens). If a question asks what happens to a murmur with a given maneuver, HCM and MVP are the two diagnoses to consider when the answer is "louder" or "more prominent."
Finally, always remember that Takotsubo cardiomyopathy is a diagnosis of exclusion. The vignette will describe what looks like an acute MI (chest pain, ST elevation, troponin bump) but the catheterization reveals clean coronary arteries. The classic patient is a postmenopausal woman who recently experienced a severe emotional shock (death of a loved one, natural disaster, surprise party). The apical ballooning pattern on ventriculography or echo is the confirmatory finding, and the condition is generally reversible.
The core competency being tested across all cardiomyopathy questions is your ability to classify the type of cardiomyopathy based on the clinical and echocardiographic phenotype and then apply the correct, type-appropriate management rather than defaulting to a one-size-fits-all heart failure approach.