Leukemia Mieloid Akut (AML)
Published on September 20, 2026
Risk Factors
Adults > 65 years old, prior chemotherapy or radiation (alkylating agents, topoisomerase II inhibitors), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), myeloproliferative neoplasms, Down syndrome (children < 5 years), benzene exposure, smoking
Etiology
Clonal proliferation of myeloid progenitor cells arrested at the blast stage due to acquired somatic mutations affecting differentiation and proliferation pathways
Presentation
Fatigue, pallor, easy bruising or bleeding (petechiae, epistaxis, gingival bleeding), recurrent infections, bone pain
Classic Exam
Gingival hyperplasia (especially M4/M5 subtypes), skin nodules (leukemia cutis), hepatosplenomegaly, lymphadenopathy (less prominent than in ALL), signs of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL)
Diagnostics
Peripheral smear: circulating blasts with Auer rods. Bone marrow biopsy: > 20% myeloblasts (WHO criterion). Flow cytometry positive for myeloid markers (CD13, CD33, CD117, MPO). Cytogenetics: t(15;17) in APL, t(8;21), inv(16)
Management
Induction chemotherapy with "7+3" regimen (7 days cytarabine + 3 days anthracycline). APL subtype: all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) + arsenic trioxide (ATO). Consolidation: high-dose cytarabine or allogeneic stem cell transplant for high-risk patients
Keywords
Auer rods, myeloperoxidase positive, gingival hyperplasia, "7+3," ATRA for APL, t(15;17), bilobed nuclei (M3), DIC in young patient with leukemia
01Pathophysiology
AML arises from the accumulation of acquired somatic mutations in hematopoietic stem or progenitor cells committed to the myeloid lineage. These mutations fall into two broad functional categories, and understanding this "two-hit" model is essential for connecting the biology to the clinical picture.
Class I mutations activate proliferative and survival signaling pathways. The most commonly tested is the FLT3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD), which constitutively activates a receptor tyrosine kinase, driving uncontrolled cell division. This mutation confers a poor prognosis and is now a targetable lesion with midostaurin. Other class I mutations include RAS and KIT.
Class II mutations impair normal myeloid differentiation. The hallmark example is the t(15;17)(q24;q21) translocation in APL, which fuses the PML gene to the retinoic acid receptor alpha (RARA) gene. The resulting PML-RARA fusion protein acts as a dominant-negative transcriptional repressor, blocking the normal differentiation of promyelocytes into mature granulocytes. This is why ATRA works: it forces the fusion protein into a conformation that releases transcriptional repression, allowing the arrested promyelocytes to terminally differentiate.
The net result of these two hit categories is a bone marrow packed with immature blasts that cannot differentiate into functional blood cells but continue to proliferate. This directly explains every symptom the patient develops:
Anemia (decreased red cell production) causes fatigue and pallor.
Thrombocytopenia (decreased platelet production) causes bleeding, petechiae, and bruising.
Neutropenia (decreased functional white cells despite a high total white count) causes recurrent and often severe infections.
Marrow expansion causes bone pain.
Extramedullary infiltration of leukemic blasts into the gums, skin, and organs causes gingival hyperplasia, leukemia cutis, and hepatosplenomegaly.
A particularly high-yield pathophysiologic concept involves APL (formerly classified as FAB M3). The abnormal promyelocytes in APL contain dense azurophilic granules loaded with procoagulant tissue factor and other substances. When these cells lyse, either spontaneously or during initial chemotherapy, they release these granule contents into the bloodstream, triggering DIC. This is why APL is a medical emergency: untreated DIC leads to simultaneous thrombosis and hemorrhage, and the mortality is front-loaded in the first hours to days. Recognizing this pattern (young patient + pancytopenia + DIC) and initiating ATRA immediately, even before cytogenetic confirmation, is the single most testable management concept in APL.
02Classification and Clinical Manifestation
FAB Classification (Morphology-Based)
M0
Name
Minimally differentiated AML
Key Morphologic/Clinical Feature
No morphologic evidence of differentiation; diagnosis requires flow cytometry/cytochemistry
High-Yield Association
Myeloperoxidase (MPO) negative by light microscopy, positive by flow
M1
Name
AML without maturation
Key Morphologic/Clinical Feature
Blasts with minimal maturation
High-Yield Association
MPO positive
M2
Name
AML with maturation
Key Morphologic/Clinical Feature
Blasts show granulocytic maturation
High-Yield Association
t(8;21): most common translocation in AML; favorable prognosis
M3
Name
Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (APL)
Key Morphologic/Clinical Feature
Hypergranular promyelocytes with bilobed (butterfly-shaped) nuclei and many Auer rods ("faggot cells")
High-Yield Association
t(15;17) PML-RARA; DIC; treated with ATRA + ATO
M4
Name
Acute Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Key Morphologic/Clinical Feature
Mixed granulocytic and monocytic differentiation
High-Yield Association
M4Eo variant has inv(16) or t(16;16); favorable prognosis
M5
Name
Acute Monocytic Leukemia
Key Morphologic/Clinical Feature
Monoblasts/promonocytes predominate
High-Yield Association
Gingival hyperplasia, leukemia cutis, CNS involvement; high serum lysozyme
M6
Name
Acute Erythroleukemia
Key Morphologic/Clinical Feature
Erythroid precursors > 50% of marrow cells
High-Yield Association
Dysplastic erythroid forms; associated with MDS transformation
M7
Name
Acute Megakaryoblastic Leukemia
Key Morphologic/Clinical Feature
Megakaryoblasts with cytoplasmic blebs
High-Yield Association
Associated with Down syndrome in children < 5 years; marrow fibrosis ("dry tap")
FAB Subtype | Name | Key Morphologic/Clinical Feature | High-Yield Association |
|---|---|---|---|
M0 | Minimally differentiated AML | No morphologic evidence of differentiation; diagnosis requires flow cytometry/cytochemistry | Myeloperoxidase (MPO) negative by light microscopy, positive by flow |
M1 | AML without maturation | Blasts with minimal maturation | MPO positive |
M2 | AML with maturation | Blasts show granulocytic maturation | t(8;21): most common translocation in AML; favorable prognosis |
M3 | Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (APL) | Hypergranular promyelocytes with bilobed (butterfly-shaped) nuclei and many Auer rods ("faggot cells") | t(15;17) PML-RARA; DIC; treated with ATRA + ATO |
M4 | Acute Myelomonocytic Leukemia | Mixed granulocytic and monocytic differentiation | M4Eo variant has inv(16) or t(16;16); favorable prognosis |
M5 | Acute Monocytic Leukemia | Monoblasts/promonocytes predominate | Gingival hyperplasia, leukemia cutis, CNS involvement; high serum lysozyme |
M6 | Acute Erythroleukemia | Erythroid precursors > 50% of marrow cells | Dysplastic erythroid forms; associated with MDS transformation |
M7 | Acute Megakaryoblastic Leukemia | Megakaryoblasts with cytoplasmic blebs | Associated with Down syndrome in children < 5 years; marrow fibrosis ("dry tap") |
WHO Classification (Genetics-Based)
The WHO system categorizes AML by recurrent genetic abnormalities, which carry prognostic and therapeutic significance.
t(8;21)(q22;q22) RUNX1-RUNX1T1
Example
M2 equivalent
Prognosis
Favorable
inv(16)(p13.1q22) or t(16;16) CBFB-MYH11
Example
M4Eo equivalent
Prognosis
Favorable
t(15;17)(q24;q21) PML-RARA
Example
APL (M3 equivalent)
Prognosis
Favorable (with ATRA/ATO)
NPM1 mutation (without FLT3-ITD)
Example
Normal karyotype AML
Prognosis
Favorable
Biallelic CEBPA mutation
Example
Normal karyotype AML
Prognosis
Favorable
FLT3-ITD (high allelic ratio)
Example
Normal karyotype AML
Prognosis
Adverse
Complex karyotype (> 3 abnormalities)
Example
Therapy-related AML, elderly
Prognosis
Adverse
TP53 mutation
Example
Often therapy-related
Prognosis
Very adverse
KMT2A (MLL) rearrangements
Example
11q23 abnormalities
Prognosis
Intermediate to adverse
Cytogenetic/Molecular Group | Example | Prognosis |
|---|---|---|
t(8;21)(q22;q22) RUNX1-RUNX1T1 | M2 equivalent | Favorable |
inv(16)(p13.1q22) or t(16;16) CBFB-MYH11 | M4Eo equivalent | Favorable |
t(15;17)(q24;q21) PML-RARA | APL (M3 equivalent) | Favorable (with ATRA/ATO) |
NPM1 mutation (without FLT3-ITD) | Normal karyotype AML | Favorable |
Biallelic CEBPA mutation | Normal karyotype AML | Favorable |
FLT3-ITD (high allelic ratio) | Normal karyotype AML | Adverse |
Complex karyotype (> 3 abnormalities) | Therapy-related AML, elderly | Adverse |
TP53 mutation | Often therapy-related | Very adverse |
KMT2A (MLL) rearrangements | 11q23 abnormalities | Intermediate to adverse |
Clinical Manifestation by Organ System
Hematologic
Manifestation
Fatigue, pallor, dyspnea on exertion
Mechanism
Anemia from marrow replacement
Hemostasis
Manifestation
Petechiae, purpura, mucosal bleeding, DIC (APL)
Mechanism
Thrombocytopenia; granule-mediated coagulopathy in APL
Immune
Manifestation
Fever, pneumonia, oral candidiasis, perianal abscess
Mechanism
Functional neutropenia
Musculoskeletal
Manifestation
Bone pain, sternal tenderness
Mechanism
Marrow expansion by blast proliferation
Oral
Manifestation
Gingival hyperplasia
Mechanism
Direct blast infiltration (M4, M5)
Dermatologic
Manifestation
Leukemia cutis (violaceous papules/nodules)
Mechanism
Extramedullary blast deposits
Neurologic
Manifestation
Cranial nerve palsies, headache
Mechanism
CNS infiltration (more common in M4, M5)
Metabolic
Manifestation
Hyperuricemia, hyperkalemia, hyperphosphatemia
Mechanism
Tumor lysis (spontaneous or treatment-induced)
Pulmonary/Cerebrovascular
Manifestation
Dyspnea, hypoxia, altered mental status
Mechanism
Leukostasis when WBC > 100,000/microL
System | Manifestation | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
Hematologic | Fatigue, pallor, dyspnea on exertion | Anemia from marrow replacement |
Hemostasis | Petechiae, purpura, mucosal bleeding, DIC (APL) | Thrombocytopenia; granule-mediated coagulopathy in APL |
Immune | Fever, pneumonia, oral candidiasis, perianal abscess | Functional neutropenia |
Musculoskeletal | Bone pain, sternal tenderness | Marrow expansion by blast proliferation |
Oral | Gingival hyperplasia | Direct blast infiltration (M4, M5) |
Dermatologic | Leukemia cutis (violaceous papules/nodules) | Extramedullary blast deposits |
Neurologic | Cranial nerve palsies, headache | CNS infiltration (more common in M4, M5) |
Metabolic | Hyperuricemia, hyperkalemia, hyperphosphatemia | Tumor lysis (spontaneous or treatment-induced) |
Pulmonary/Cerebrovascular | Dyspnea, hypoxia, altered mental status | Leukostasis when WBC > 100,000/microL |
03Diagnostic Workup
Complete blood count (CBC) with differential
Purpose
Initial screening
Key Findings
Anemia, thrombocytopenia, WBC variable (may be high, normal, or low); blasts on differential
Peripheral blood smear
Purpose
Morphologic assessment
Key Findings
Auer rods (pathognomonic for myeloid lineage), large blasts with high N:C ratio
Bone marrow biopsy and aspirate
Purpose
Gold standard for diagnosis
Key Findings
> 20% myeloblasts (WHO criterion)
Flow cytometry
Purpose
Immunophenotyping to confirm myeloid lineage
Key Findings
CD13, CD33, CD117, MPO positive; CD34 often positive; helps distinguish from ALL
Cytochemistry
Purpose
Supplementary lineage confirmation
Key Findings
Myeloperoxidase (MPO) positive and Sudan Black B positive in myeloid blasts
Cytogenetics (karyotype)
Purpose
Risk stratification and subtype classification
Key Findings
t(15;17), t(8;21), inv(16), complex karyotype
FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridization)
Purpose
Rapid detection of known translocations
Key Findings
Used for urgent confirmation of t(15;17) when APL is suspected clinically
Molecular testing (PCR, NGS)
Purpose
Identify targetable and prognostic mutations
Key Findings
FLT3-ITD, NPM1, CEBPA, IDH1/2, TP53
Coagulation panel (PT, aPTT, fibrinogen, D-dimer)
Purpose
Screen for DIC
Key Findings
Prolonged PT/aPTT, low fibrinogen, elevated D-dimer (APL)
Tumor lysis labs (uric acid, LDH, phosphorus, calcium, potassium, creatinine)
Purpose
Baseline and monitoring
Key Findings
Elevated uric acid and LDH at presentation suggest high tumor burden
Test | Purpose | Key Findings |
|---|---|---|
Complete blood count (CBC) with differential | Initial screening | Anemia, thrombocytopenia, WBC variable (may be high, normal, or low); blasts on differential |
Peripheral blood smear | Morphologic assessment | Auer rods (pathognomonic for myeloid lineage), large blasts with high N:C ratio |
Bone marrow biopsy and aspirate | Gold standard for diagnosis | > 20% myeloblasts (WHO criterion) |
Flow cytometry | Immunophenotyping to confirm myeloid lineage | CD13, CD33, CD117, MPO positive; CD34 often positive; helps distinguish from ALL |
Cytochemistry | Supplementary lineage confirmation | Myeloperoxidase (MPO) positive and Sudan Black B positive in myeloid blasts |
Cytogenetics (karyotype) | Risk stratification and subtype classification | t(15;17), t(8;21), inv(16), complex karyotype |
FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridization) | Rapid detection of known translocations | Used for urgent confirmation of t(15;17) when APL is suspected clinically |
Molecular testing (PCR, NGS) | Identify targetable and prognostic mutations | FLT3-ITD, NPM1, CEBPA, IDH1/2, TP53 |
Coagulation panel (PT, aPTT, fibrinogen, D-dimer) | Screen for DIC | Prolonged PT/aPTT, low fibrinogen, elevated D-dimer (APL) |
Tumor lysis labs (uric acid, LDH, phosphorus, calcium, potassium, creatinine) | Baseline and monitoring | Elevated uric acid and LDH at presentation suggest high tumor burden |
The best initial test when AML is suspected based on the clinical picture (pancytopenia, bleeding, infections in an adult) is a CBC with differential and a peripheral blood smear. The smear may reveal circulating blasts. The presence of Auer rods, which are crystallized aggregates of myeloperoxidase within the cytoplasm of myeloblasts, is pathognomonic for a myeloid neoplasm and should never be seen in ALL. In APL, multiple Auer rods bundled together in a single cell form what are called "faggot cells", a nearly diagnostic finding.
However, the peripheral smear alone is insufficient for a definitive diagnosis. The most accurate (confirmatory) test is the bone marrow biopsy and aspirate. According to WHO criteria, a diagnosis of AML requires > 20% myeloblasts in the bone marrow (or in peripheral blood). The exception is when a defining recurrent genetic abnormality, such as t(8;21), inv(16), or t(15;17), is present; in these cases, AML is diagnosed regardless of blast percentage.
Once blasts are identified, flow cytometry is performed to confirm myeloid lineage. The key myeloid markers are CD13, CD33, CD117, and cytoplasmic MPO. This step is critical because it distinguishes AML from ALL, which expresses lymphoid markers (CD10, CD19, CD20 for B-ALL; CD2, CD3, CD5, CD7 for T-ALL). Some AML subtypes co-express lymphoid markers (mixed phenotype acute leukemia), so flow cytometry interpretation requires the full panel.
Cytogenetics and molecular studies must be sent on every new AML diagnosis because they determine both the prognosis and the treatment plan. The three most testable cytogenetic findings are:
t(15;17): PML-RARA fusion, defines APL, treated with ATRA + ATO rather than standard chemotherapy.
t(8;21): RUNX1-RUNX1T1, favorable prognosis, good response to high-dose cytarabine consolidation.
inv(16) or t(16;16): CBFB-MYH11, favorable prognosis, also responds well to consolidation cytarabine.
In clinical practice, when APL is suspected (pancytopenia + DIC + hypergranular promyelocytes on smear), FISH for t(15;17) or PCR for PML-RARA should be sent urgently, and ATRA should be started immediately without waiting for results, because the mortality risk from DIC is highest in the first 24 to 48 hours.
A coagulation panel is essential at presentation, particularly to identify DIC. Look for the classic laboratory pattern: prolonged PT and aPTT, markedly decreased fibrinogen, and elevated D-dimer and fibrin degradation products. This pattern in the context of acute leukemia should immediately raise suspicion for APL.
04Management and Treatment
Induction (non-APL)
Regimen
"7+3"
Details
Continuous IV cytarabine 100-200 mg/m^2/day for 7 days + daunorubicin 60 mg/m^2/day (or idarubicin 12 mg/m^2/day) for 3 days
Induction (APL)
Regimen
ATRA + ATO
Details
All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) 45 mg/m^2/day orally in divided doses + arsenic trioxide (ATO) 0.15 mg/kg/day IV; for high-risk APL (WBC > 10,000), add idarubicin
Consolidation (favorable risk)
Regimen
High-dose cytarabine (HiDAC)
Details
Cytarabine 3 g/m^2 IV over 3 hours every 12 hours on days 1, 3, 5 for 3 to 4 cycles
Consolidation (intermediate/adverse risk)
Regimen
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT)
Details
Performed in first complete remission if a donor is available
Consolidation (APL)
Regimen
ATRA + ATO cycles
Details
Alternating cycles of ATRA and ATO for approximately 28 weeks total
Targeted therapy add-ons
Regimen
Midostaurin (FLT3 inhibitor)
Details
Added to 7+3 induction and consolidation for FLT3-mutated AML
Supportive care
Regimen
Transfusions, antimicrobials, tumor lysis prophylaxis
Details
Platelet transfusion to keep count > 10,000 (> 50,000 if active bleeding); prophylactic allopurinol or rasburicase; broad-spectrum antibiotics for febrile neutropenia
Unfit/elderly patients
Regimen
Hypomethylating agents (HMA) +/- venetoclax
Details
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2/day SC for 7 days + venetoclax (dose-adjusted) in 28-day cycles
Phase | Regimen | Details |
|---|---|---|
Induction (non-APL) | "7+3" | Continuous IV cytarabine 100-200 mg/m^2/day for 7 days + daunorubicin 60 mg/m^2/day (or idarubicin 12 mg/m^2/day) for 3 days |
Induction (APL) | ATRA + ATO | All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) 45 mg/m^2/day orally in divided doses + arsenic trioxide (ATO) 0.15 mg/kg/day IV; for high-risk APL (WBC > 10,000), add idarubicin |
Consolidation (favorable risk) | High-dose cytarabine (HiDAC) | Cytarabine 3 g/m^2 IV over 3 hours every 12 hours on days 1, 3, 5 for 3 to 4 cycles |
Consolidation (intermediate/adverse risk) | Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) | Performed in first complete remission if a donor is available |
Consolidation (APL) | ATRA + ATO cycles | Alternating cycles of ATRA and ATO for approximately 28 weeks total |
Targeted therapy add-ons | Midostaurin (FLT3 inhibitor) | Added to 7+3 induction and consolidation for FLT3-mutated AML |
Supportive care | Transfusions, antimicrobials, tumor lysis prophylaxis | Platelet transfusion to keep count > 10,000 (> 50,000 if active bleeding); prophylactic allopurinol or rasburicase; broad-spectrum antibiotics for febrile neutropenia |
Unfit/elderly patients | Hypomethylating agents (HMA) +/- venetoclax | Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2/day SC for 7 days + venetoclax (dose-adjusted) in 28-day cycles |
Acute Stabilization
Before initiating definitive therapy, several urgent issues may need attention:
DIC (APL): Start ATRA immediately if APL is clinically suspected. Do not wait for cytogenetic confirmation. Aggressively replace fibrinogen with cryoprecipitate (target fibrinogen > 150 mg/dL) and transfuse platelets to maintain counts above 30,000 to 50,000/microL during the acute DIC phase.
Leukostasis: When the WBC exceeds approximately 100,000/microL and the patient develops respiratory distress or neurologic symptoms, this constitutes a hematologic emergency. Management includes urgent leukapheresis and initiation of induction chemotherapy. Avoid red blood cell transfusion before cytoreduction, as this increases blood viscosity and can worsen symptoms.
Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) prophylaxis: Begin IV hydration and allopurinol (300 mg/day orally) before starting chemotherapy. For patients at very high risk (elevated uric acid, high WBC, large tumor burden), use rasburicase (0.2 mg/kg IV once), which is a recombinant urate oxidase that rapidly converts uric acid to the more soluble allantoin. A contraindication to rasburicase is G6PD deficiency, as it can trigger hemolytic anemia.
Induction Chemotherapy (Non-APL AML)
The standard induction regimen is the "7+3" protocol: 7 days of continuous infusion cytarabine combined with 3 days of an anthracycline (daunorubicin or idarubicin). The goal is to achieve complete remission (CR), defined as less than 5% blasts in the bone marrow with recovery of peripheral blood counts. A bone marrow biopsy is performed approximately 14 days after induction to assess response. If residual disease is present, a second cycle of induction (re-induction) may be given.
For patients with FLT3-ITD positive AML, the tyrosine kinase inhibitor midostaurin is added to the 7+3 induction and subsequent consolidation cycles. This is based on the RATIFY trial, which demonstrated improved overall survival.
Induction for APL
APL is treated with a fundamentally different regimen. Low-to-intermediate risk APL (WBC < 10,000/microL) is treated with ATRA + ATO alone, without conventional chemotherapy. ATRA induces the differentiation of the arrested promyelocytes into mature granulocytes, while ATO induces apoptosis and degradation of the PML-RARA oncoprotein. High-risk APL (WBC > 10,000/microL) adds idarubicin to the ATRA + ATO backbone.
A critical complication of ATRA therapy is differentiation syndrome (formerly called retinoic acid syndrome), characterized by fever, dyspnea, weight gain, pulmonary infiltrates, pleural and pericardial effusions, and hypotension. It occurs because the differentiating leukemic cells release cytokines and infiltrate tissues. Treatment is dexamethasone 10 mg IV every 12 hours, and ATRA may be temporarily held in severe cases.
Consolidation Therapy
After achieving CR, consolidation is necessary to eliminate residual disease and prevent relapse. The consolidation strategy depends on the cytogenetic risk group:
Favorable risk [t(8;21), inv(16), NPM1-mutated/FLT3-wild type]: 3 to 4 cycles of high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC) without transplant. A side effect to watch for with high-dose cytarabine is cerebellar toxicity (ataxia, dysarthria, nystagmus), particularly in patients over 60 years old.
Intermediate risk: Allo-HSCT in first CR is preferred if a matched donor is available. HiDAC is an alternative for patients without a donor.
Adverse risk [complex karyotype, TP53 mutation, FLT3-ITD with high allelic ratio]: Allo-HSCT in first CR is strongly recommended, as chemotherapy alone has a very high relapse rate.
Elderly or Unfit Patients
Patients who cannot tolerate intensive induction (generally older adults with significant comorbidities) are treated with hypomethylating agents (azacitidine or decitabine) combined with venetoclax, a BCL-2 inhibitor. This lower-intensity regimen has shown response rates comparable to 7+3 in older adults with significantly less toxicity. A notable side effect of venetoclax is prolonged cytopenias, requiring dose adjustments and careful monitoring.
05Differential Diagnosis and Distractors
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)
Why It Is Similar
Both present with pancytopenia, fatigue, bleeding, and blasts on smear
Key Discriminator
ALL blasts are MPO-negative, TdT-positive, and express lymphoid markers (CD10, CD19, CD20 for B-ALL). ALL is more common in children (peak 2-5 years). Auer rods are never seen in ALL.
Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)
Why It Is Similar
Also presents with cytopenias and dysplastic marrow; can transform to AML
Key Discriminator
MDS has < 20% blasts in the marrow. Dysplastic features (hypolobated neutrophils, ringed sideroblasts) predominate. MDS is an indolent process with gradual onset, unlike the acute presentation of AML.
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) in blast crisis
Why It Is Similar
Blast crisis CML can look identical to de novo AML
Key Discriminator
CML blast crisis occurs in a patient with a known history of CML (or findings of CML such as the Philadelphia chromosome, t(9;22), BCR-ABL fusion). The peripheral smear in chronic phase CML shows the entire spectrum of myeloid maturation ("left shift"), not the "hiatus" of AML.
Aplastic Anemia
Why It Is Similar
Pancytopenia, fatigue, bleeding, infections
Key Discriminator
Aplastic anemia has a hypocellular (empty) bone marrow replaced by fat, not blasts. No circulating blasts are seen on the peripheral smear.
Infectious Mononucleosis (EBV)
Why It Is Similar
Can cause atypical lymphocytes on smear that may be mistaken for blasts; fatigue, fever, lymphadenopathy
Key Discriminator
Atypical lymphocytes in EBV are reactive T cells, not blasts. They have abundant cytoplasm that indents around neighboring red cells. Positive heterophile antibody (Monospot) test. No Auer rods.
Vitamin B12/Folate Deficiency
Why It Is Similar
Pancytopenia with large cells (macrocytosis) can mimic leukemia
Key Discriminator
Megaloblastic anemia shows hypersegmented neutrophils (> 5 lobes), not blasts. MCV is markedly elevated (often > 110 fL). Corrects with supplementation.
Leukemoid Reaction
Why It Is Similar
WBC can exceed 50,000 with a left shift, mimicking leukemia
Key Discriminator
Leukemoid reaction has a cause (severe infection, stress, burns). The cells are mature neutrophils with toxic granulations and Dohle bodies, not blasts. Leukocyte alkaline phosphatase (LAP) score is high (vs. low in CML).
Differential | Why It Is Similar | Key Discriminator |
|---|---|---|
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) | Both present with pancytopenia, fatigue, bleeding, and blasts on smear | ALL blasts are MPO-negative, TdT-positive, and express lymphoid markers (CD10, CD19, CD20 for B-ALL). ALL is more common in children (peak 2-5 years). Auer rods are never seen in ALL. |
Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) | Also presents with cytopenias and dysplastic marrow; can transform to AML | MDS has < 20% blasts in the marrow. Dysplastic features (hypolobated neutrophils, ringed sideroblasts) predominate. MDS is an indolent process with gradual onset, unlike the acute presentation of AML. |
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) in blast crisis | Blast crisis CML can look identical to de novo AML | CML blast crisis occurs in a patient with a known history of CML (or findings of CML such as the Philadelphia chromosome, t(9;22), BCR-ABL fusion). The peripheral smear in chronic phase CML shows the entire spectrum of myeloid maturation ("left shift"), not the "hiatus" of AML. |
Aplastic Anemia | Pancytopenia, fatigue, bleeding, infections | Aplastic anemia has a hypocellular (empty) bone marrow replaced by fat, not blasts. No circulating blasts are seen on the peripheral smear. |
Infectious Mononucleosis (EBV) | Can cause atypical lymphocytes on smear that may be mistaken for blasts; fatigue, fever, lymphadenopathy | Atypical lymphocytes in EBV are reactive T cells, not blasts. They have abundant cytoplasm that indents around neighboring red cells. Positive heterophile antibody (Monospot) test. No Auer rods. |
Vitamin B12/Folate Deficiency | Pancytopenia with large cells (macrocytosis) can mimic leukemia | Megaloblastic anemia shows hypersegmented neutrophils (> 5 lobes), not blasts. MCV is markedly elevated (often > 110 fL). Corrects with supplementation. |
Leukemoid Reaction | WBC can exceed 50,000 with a left shift, mimicking leukemia | Leukemoid reaction has a cause (severe infection, stress, burns). The cells are mature neutrophils with toxic granulations and Dohle bodies, not blasts. Leukocyte alkaline phosphatase (LAP) score is high (vs. low in CML). |
06Traps and High-Yield Pearls
The most common way students lose points on AML questions is by failing to recognize APL as a distinct entity that requires immediate, different treatment. A vignette describing a young adult with pancytopenia, bleeding, and laboratory evidence of DIC should trigger the response: "Start ATRA now." The trap is selecting standard 7+3 chemotherapy as the first step, or waiting for cytogenetic results before initiating therapy. Standard chemotherapy given to an APL patient without ATRA can worsen DIC by lysing the granule-laden promyelocytes, leading to fatal hemorrhage.
A second common trap involves the blast percentage. Students sometimes diagnose AML when blasts are between 10 and 20%. Remember: the WHO threshold is > 20% blasts. Below that number, the diagnosis is MDS (unless a defining cytogenetic abnormality is present, which overrides the blast percentage rule). Conversely, if the question stem provides a recurrent cytogenetic abnormality like t(8;21), the blast count does not need to reach 20% for the diagnosis to be AML.
Another tested concept is differentiating the cause of gingival hyperplasia. When a vignette describes swollen, bleeding gums in the context of pancytopenia and blasts, the answer is leukemic infiltration (M4 or M5 subtype AML). When it describes gingival hyperplasia in a patient on an antiepileptic, the answer is phenytoin. When it describes it in a transplant patient, the answer is cyclosporine. The context makes the diagnosis.
The distinction between AML and ALL on a peripheral smear is another favorite testing point. If the question mentions Auer rods, the answer is always AML. If it mentions TdT positivity, the answer is ALL (though TdT can rarely be positive in M0/M1 AML, this nuance is not tested at the licensing exam level). MPO positivity confirms myeloid lineage; PAS positivity (periodic acid-Schiff, coarse granular staining in blasts) suggests ALL.
Finally, be alert for the complication questions. If a patient on ATRA develops fever, dyspnea, and pulmonary infiltrates with weight gain, the answer is differentiation syndrome, treated with dexamethasone. If a patient starting chemotherapy for high-burden AML develops hyperuricemia, hyperkalemia, hyperphosphatemia, and hypocalcemia, the answer is tumor lysis syndrome, and the question will likely test whether you choose allopurinol (prevention) versus rasburicase (treatment of established TLS with elevated uric acid). Remember the G6PD contraindication to rasburicase.
The core competency being tested across AML questions is your ability to: (1) recognize the acute leukemia presentation, (2) correctly identify the lineage (myeloid vs. lymphoid), (3) distinguish APL from non-APL AML, and (4) select the appropriate next step in management based on the subtype and clinical urgency.