Melasma
Published on June 8, 2026
Risk Factors
Women of reproductive age, Fitzpatrick skin types III to V, pregnancy, oral contraceptive or hormone replacement therapy use, family history, chronic UV exposure
Etiology
Melanocyte hyperactivity (not proliferation) driven by UV radiation, hormonal stimulation (estrogen and progesterone), and genetic susceptibility
Presentation
Slowly progressive, symmetric, hyperpigmented patches on the face; cosmetically distressing; painless and asymptomatic
Classic Exam
Well-demarcated, symmetric brown to gray-brown macules and patches on the cheeks, forehead, upper lip, nose, and chin; no scaling, no induration
Diagnostics
Clinical diagnosis; Wood's lamp distinguishes epidermal (accentuated) from dermal (not accentuated) types; biopsy rarely needed
Management
Strict photoprotection is the foundation; first-line topical therapy is triple combination cream (hydroquinone + tretinoin + corticosteroid); alternatives include azelaic acid, tranexamic acid, and chemical peels
Keywords
"Mask of pregnancy," symmetric facial hyperpigmentation, worsens with sun exposure, reproductive-age woman on OCPs, Wood's lamp enhancement
01Pathophysiology
Melasma is a disorder of melanocyte hyperactivity, not melanocyte proliferation. This distinction matters on exams because it separates melasma from melanocytic neoplasms. The melanocytes in affected skin are functionally overactive and produce excess melanin, but their total number remains essentially normal.
The central drivers are ultraviolet radiation and hormonal influence. UV light stimulates melanogenesis through multiple pathways. It upregulates alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (-MSH), adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), and stem cell factor (SCF) in keratinocytes, all of which signal neighboring melanocytes to increase melanin synthesis. This explains why melasma exclusively involves sun-exposed skin and why it worsens in summer or with increased UV exposure.
Estrogen and progesterone are potent stimulators of melanogenesis. Melanocytes express estrogen receptors, and activation of these receptors upregulates tyrosinase, the rate-limiting enzyme in melanin production. This hormonal link accounts for the strong clinical association with pregnancy (historically called chloasma or the "mask of pregnancy"), oral contraceptive pills, and hormone replacement therapy. During pregnancy, elevated estrogen and progesterone levels drive melanocyte activity, producing the classic facial hyperpigmentation that may partially or fully resolve postpartum.
A genetic predisposition is also well established. Melasma has higher prevalence in individuals with darker skin phototypes (Fitzpatrick III through V), and a family history is present in many patients. The genetic component likely involves polymorphisms in genes governing melanin synthesis, melanocyte signaling, and UV-induced DNA repair.
More recent research has identified a vascular component to melasma. Lesional skin shows increased expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and a higher density of dermal blood vessels compared to surrounding normal skin. This vascular element helps explain why melasma can be resistant to depigmenting therapies alone and why some treatment strategies now target vascularity.
The excess melanin can be deposited in the epidermis, the dermis (within melanophages), or both. This depth of pigment deposition directly determines the clinical appearance and the response to therapy. Epidermal melasma appears brown and responds better to topical depigmenting agents, while dermal melasma appears gray-brown or blue-gray and is more refractory to treatment.
02Classification and Clinical Manifestation
Distribution Pattern
Centrofacial
Location
Forehead, cheeks, nose, upper lip, chin
Frequency
Most common (~65% of cases)
Malar
Location
Cheeks and nose only
Frequency
Second most common (~20%)
Mandibular
Location
Rami of the jaw, chin
Frequency
Least common (~15%)
Pattern | Location | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
Centrofacial | Forehead, cheeks, nose, upper lip, chin | Most common (~65% of cases) |
Malar | Cheeks and nose only | Second most common (~20%) |
Mandibular | Rami of the jaw, chin | Least common (~15%) |
Depth of Pigmentation (Wood's Lamp Classification)
Epidermal
Wood's Lamp Finding
Pigment is accentuated (becomes more apparent)
Pigment Location
Increased melanin in basal and suprabasal epidermis
Clinical Color
Light to dark brown
Treatment Response
Good response to topical therapy
Dermal
Wood's Lamp Finding
Pigment is not accentuated (no change)
Pigment Location
Melanophages in superficial and mid-dermis
Clinical Color
Gray-brown or blue-gray
Treatment Response
Poor response to topical therapy
Mixed
Wood's Lamp Finding
Pigment is partially accentuated
Pigment Location
Both epidermal melanin excess and dermal melanophages
Clinical Color
Brown with gray-brown areas
Treatment Response
Variable response
Indeterminate
Wood's Lamp Finding
Not assessable
Pigment Location
Cannot be determined by Wood's lamp
Clinical Color
Varies
Treatment Response
Seen in very dark skin (Fitzpatrick VI)
Type | Wood's Lamp Finding | Pigment Location | Clinical Color | Treatment Response |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Epidermal | Pigment is accentuated (becomes more apparent) | Increased melanin in basal and suprabasal epidermis | Light to dark brown | Good response to topical therapy |
Dermal | Pigment is not accentuated (no change) | Melanophages in superficial and mid-dermis | Gray-brown or blue-gray | Poor response to topical therapy |
Mixed | Pigment is partially accentuated | Both epidermal melanin excess and dermal melanophages | Brown with gray-brown areas | Variable response |
Indeterminate | Not assessable | Cannot be determined by Wood's lamp | Varies | Seen in very dark skin (Fitzpatrick VI) |
Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI)
The MASI score is used to quantify disease severity and track treatment response. It evaluates four facial regions (forehead, right malar, left malar, chin), scoring each for area of involvement (0 to 6), darkness of pigmentation (0 to 4), and homogeneity of pigmentation (0 to 4). The maximum score is 48, and a modified version (mMASI) omits the homogeneity component for simplicity.
03Diagnostic Workup
Clinical examination
Role
Best initial step / primary diagnostic method
Finding
Symmetric, well-demarcated hyperpigmented patches on sun-exposed facial areas
Wood's lamp (365 nm UV)
Role
Classification of depth
Finding
Epidermal: accentuated; Dermal: not accentuated; Mixed: partial accentuation
Dermoscopy
Role
Adjunctive tool for pigment characterization
Finding
Brown reticular or diffuse pigment pattern (epidermal); gray-blue dots or globules (dermal); increased arborizing vessels
Skin biopsy
Role
Rarely indicated; used to rule out other diagnoses
Finding
Increased epidermal melanin, solar elastosis, dermal melanophages; no melanocyte atypia
Test | Role | Finding |
|---|---|---|
Clinical examination | Best initial step / primary diagnostic method | Symmetric, well-demarcated hyperpigmented patches on sun-exposed facial areas |
Wood's lamp (365 nm UV) | Classification of depth | Epidermal: accentuated; Dermal: not accentuated; Mixed: partial accentuation |
Dermoscopy | Adjunctive tool for pigment characterization | Brown reticular or diffuse pigment pattern (epidermal); gray-blue dots or globules (dermal); increased arborizing vessels |
Skin biopsy | Rarely indicated; used to rule out other diagnoses | Increased epidermal melanin, solar elastosis, dermal melanophages; no melanocyte atypia |
Melasma is fundamentally a clinical diagnosis. The combination of a characteristic patient profile (reproductive-age woman, darker skin phototype, hormonal trigger) with symmetric facial hyperpigmentation in a sun-exposed distribution is usually sufficient.
The Wood's lamp examination is the most important ancillary test and the one most commonly tested on exams. Its purpose is not to confirm the diagnosis but to classify the depth of pigment deposition, which directly informs treatment planning and prognosis counseling. To use the Wood's lamp correctly, the examination must be performed in a completely dark room. The 365 nm UV light causes epidermal melanin to fluoresce, making it appear more prominent. Dermal melanin does not fluoresce and will not change in appearance. Students should remember: if pigment is accentuated under Wood's lamp, it is epidermal and more likely to respond to topical depigmenting agents.
Dermoscopy is increasingly used and may appear in exam vignettes. On dermoscopy, epidermal melasma shows a brown diffuse or reticular pigment pattern, whereas dermal involvement shows gray or blue structureless areas and dermal melanophages.
Skin biopsy is reserved for cases where the clinical picture is atypical or another diagnosis (such as post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, lichen planus pigmentosus, or cutaneous melanoma) cannot be excluded. Histopathology will show increased melanin within the basal layer, possibly extending to the suprabasal epidermis, along with solar elastosis and dermal melanophages in dermal-type disease. Importantly, there is no melanocyte atypia and no increase in melanocyte number, which distinguishes melasma from lentigo maligna and other melanocytic proliferations.
04Management and Treatment
Foundation (all patients)
Intervention
Strict photoprotection
Details
Broad-spectrum SPF 30+ with iron oxide (visible light protection); reapply every 2 hours; physical barriers (wide-brimmed hat)
First-line topical
Intervention
Triple combination cream (Kligman's formula)
Details
Hydroquinone 4% + tretinoin 0.05% + fluocinolone acetonide 0.01%; apply nightly for 8 to 12 weeks
Alternative topicals
Intervention
Hydroquinone monotherapy
Details
2% (OTC) or 4% (prescription); apply to affected areas twice daily; limit use to 4 to 6 months to avoid ochronosis
Alternative topicals
Intervention
Azelaic acid
Details
15 to 20% cream or gel; apply twice daily; safe in pregnancy
Alternative topicals
Intervention
Tranexamic acid (topical)
Details
2 to 5% cream; apply twice daily; emerging evidence
Alternative topicals
Intervention
Other depigmenting agents
Details
Kojic acid, arbutin, niacinamide, vitamin C, cysteamine
Oral therapy
Intervention
Tranexamic acid (oral)
Details
250 mg twice daily for 3 to 6 months; reserved for recalcitrant cases
Procedural
Intervention
Chemical peels
Details
Glycolic acid 30 to 70%, salicylic acid; adjunctive to topical therapy
Procedural
Intervention
Laser / light-based therapy
Details
Low-fluence Q-switched Nd:YAG (1064 nm); use cautiously due to risk of rebound hyperpigmentation
Maintenance
Intervention
Long-term photoprotection + intermittent topicals
Details
Continue sunscreen indefinitely; cycle non-hydroquinone agents to prevent relapse
Phase | Intervention | Details |
|---|---|---|
Foundation (all patients) | Strict photoprotection | Broad-spectrum SPF 30+ with iron oxide (visible light protection); reapply every 2 hours; physical barriers (wide-brimmed hat) |
First-line topical | Triple combination cream (Kligman's formula) | Hydroquinone 4% + tretinoin 0.05% + fluocinolone acetonide 0.01%; apply nightly for 8 to 12 weeks |
Alternative topicals | Hydroquinone monotherapy | 2% (OTC) or 4% (prescription); apply to affected areas twice daily; limit use to 4 to 6 months to avoid ochronosis |
Azelaic acid | 15 to 20% cream or gel; apply twice daily; safe in pregnancy | |
Tranexamic acid (topical) | 2 to 5% cream; apply twice daily; emerging evidence | |
Other depigmenting agents | Kojic acid, arbutin, niacinamide, vitamin C, cysteamine | |
Oral therapy | Tranexamic acid (oral) | 250 mg twice daily for 3 to 6 months; reserved for recalcitrant cases |
Procedural | Chemical peels | Glycolic acid 30 to 70%, salicylic acid; adjunctive to topical therapy |
Laser / light-based therapy | Low-fluence Q-switched Nd:YAG (1064 nm); use cautiously due to risk of rebound hyperpigmentation | |
Maintenance | Long-term photoprotection + intermittent topicals | Continue sunscreen indefinitely; cycle non-hydroquinone agents to prevent relapse |
Photoprotection is the single most important intervention and must be emphasized to every patient regardless of other treatments. Exam questions frequently test whether a student recognizes that depigmenting therapy without sun protection is futile. Broad-spectrum sunscreen with SPF 30 or higher should be applied daily and reapplied every two hours during sun exposure. Sunscreens containing iron oxide are preferred because they block visible light, which can independently stimulate melanogenesis in darker skin types through opsin-3 receptors. Physical sun avoidance and protective clothing are also essential.
The first-line pharmacologic therapy is the triple combination cream (also known as Kligman's formula or modified Kligman's formula): hydroquinone 4%, tretinoin 0.05%, and fluocinolone acetonide 0.01%. This combination works synergistically. Hydroquinone inhibits tyrosinase and is the most potent topical depigmenting agent available. Tretinoin accelerates epidermal turnover and enhances hydroquinone penetration. Fluocinolone (a mild corticosteroid) reduces irritation from the other two agents and may independently inhibit melanogenesis. The cream is applied once nightly for 8 to 12 weeks, then tapered.
Hydroquinone monotherapy can be used where the triple combination is unavailable. The concentration ranges from 2% (available over the counter in some regions) to 4% (prescription strength). Continuous use should not exceed 4 to 6 months because prolonged application risks exogenous ochronosis, an irreversible blue-black discoloration of the skin. This is a commonly tested adverse effect.
Azelaic acid (15 to 20%) is a safe and effective alternative, particularly notable because it is pregnancy category B and can be used during pregnancy, when hydroquinone and tretinoin are contraindicated. It inhibits tyrosinase and has antiproliferative effects on hyperactive melanocytes.
Oral tranexamic acid at 250 mg twice daily has emerged as a treatment for refractory melasma. It works by inhibiting plasminogen activator, which reduces UV-induced prostaglandin and arachidonic acid release, thereby decreasing melanocyte-stimulating signals. It also reduces the vascular component of melasma. Before prescribing, screen for contraindications including active thromboembolic disease, history of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, and concurrent use of combined oral contraceptives (additive thrombotic risk).
Chemical peels with glycolic acid (30 to 70%) serve as adjuncts to topical therapy. They enhance penetration of depigmenting agents and remove superficial melanin. Peels should be used cautiously in darker skin types due to the risk of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation.
Laser therapy is a last resort for recalcitrant disease. Low-fluence Q-switched Nd:YAG laser (1064 nm) can target dermal melanin, but there is a well-documented risk of paradoxical rebound hyperpigmentation, especially in darker skin. This makes laser treatment a double-edged intervention that exam vignettes may test as a complication.
05Differential Diagnosis and Distractors
Post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH)
Why It Looks Similar
Brown patches on the face in patients with darker skin types
Key Discriminator
PIH follows a preceding inflammatory event (acne, eczema, trauma); distribution is not symmetric; history of prior dermatitis at the same site
Solar lentigines ("sun spots")
Why It Looks Similar
Hyperpigmented macules on sun-exposed facial skin
Key Discriminator
Solar lentigines are discrete, well-defined, round macules, not confluent patches; they occur in older patients and lack hormonal association
Lentigo maligna
Why It Looks Similar
Brown to dark patch on sun-exposed facial skin, often in an older patient
Key Discriminator
Lentigo maligna is typically unilateral, asymmetric, with irregular borders and color variation; dermoscopy shows atypical melanocyte features; biopsy shows melanocyte atypia (premalignant)
Lichen planus pigmentosus
Why It Looks Similar
Gray-brown facial pigmentation, particularly in darker skin types
Key Discriminator
Involves non-sun-exposed areas as well (neck, intertriginous folds); may have preceding violaceous papules of lichen planus; biopsy shows interface dermatitis
Addison's disease (primary adrenal insufficiency)
Why It Looks Similar
Diffuse skin darkening including the face
Key Discriminator
Hyperpigmentation is generalized and also involves palmar creases, buccal mucosa, and skin folds; associated with fatigue, hypotension, hyperkalemia, and hyponatremia
Drug-induced hyperpigmentation
Why It Looks Similar
Symmetric facial pigmentation; can mimic melasma distribution
Key Discriminator
Careful medication history reveals a temporal association with a causative drug (minocycline, amiodarone, antimalarials, phenytoin); pigmentation often has a blue-gray or slate hue
Acanthosis nigricans
Why It Looks Similar
Hyperpigmented patches in a patient who may be female and of darker complexion
Key Discriminator
Acanthosis nigricans is velvety and thickened (not flat), located in skin folds (axillae, neck, groin), and is associated with insulin resistance, not UV or hormonal triggers
DifferentiaL | Why It Looks Similar | Key Discriminator |
|---|---|---|
Post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) | Brown patches on the face in patients with darker skin types | PIH follows a preceding inflammatory event (acne, eczema, trauma); distribution is not symmetric; history of prior dermatitis at the same site |
Solar lentigines ("sun spots") | Hyperpigmented macules on sun-exposed facial skin | Solar lentigines are discrete, well-defined, round macules, not confluent patches; they occur in older patients and lack hormonal association |
Lentigo maligna | Brown to dark patch on sun-exposed facial skin, often in an older patient | Lentigo maligna is typically unilateral, asymmetric, with irregular borders and color variation; dermoscopy shows atypical melanocyte features; biopsy shows melanocyte atypia (premalignant) |
Lichen planus pigmentosus | Gray-brown facial pigmentation, particularly in darker skin types | Involves non-sun-exposed areas as well (neck, intertriginous folds); may have preceding violaceous papules of lichen planus; biopsy shows interface dermatitis |
Addison's disease (primary adrenal insufficiency) | Diffuse skin darkening including the face | Hyperpigmentation is generalized and also involves palmar creases, buccal mucosa, and skin folds; associated with fatigue, hypotension, hyperkalemia, and hyponatremia |
Drug-induced hyperpigmentation | Symmetric facial pigmentation; can mimic melasma distribution | Careful medication history reveals a temporal association with a causative drug (minocycline, amiodarone, antimalarials, phenytoin); pigmentation often has a blue-gray or slate hue |
Acanthosis nigricans | Hyperpigmented patches in a patient who may be female and of darker complexion | Acanthosis nigricans is velvety and thickened (not flat), located in skin folds (axillae, neck, groin), and is associated with insulin resistance, not UV or hormonal triggers |
06Traps and High-Yield Pearls
The most common way students lose points on melasma questions is by jumping to pharmacologic treatment without recognizing photoprotection as the foundation of management. A vignette may describe a woman already using hydroquinone cream with no improvement, and the correct next step is not to escalate therapy but to assess and reinforce strict sun protection. Without adequate UV avoidance, no depigmenting regimen will work.
A second frequent trap involves pregnancy. If the vignette presents a pregnant woman with facial hyperpigmentation, students must recognize that hydroquinone and tretinoin are contraindicated. The correct answer in this setting is azelaic acid (safe in pregnancy) combined with photoprotection, not the standard triple combination cream. Some students reflexively choose Kligman's formula as the first-line answer without screening for pregnancy status.
A third tested concept is the Wood's lamp interpretation. Students must know that accentuation of pigment under Wood's lamp indicates epidermal melanin and predicts a better treatment response, while absence of accentuation points to dermal melanin and a more refractory course. A question that provides Wood's lamp findings is almost certainly testing your ability to classify depth and counsel the patient appropriately regarding prognosis.
Finally, watch for the exogenous ochronosis trap. If a patient using hydroquinone develops worsening blue-black discoloration rather than lightening, the diagnosis is ochronosis from prolonged hydroquinone use, not treatment failure requiring a higher dose. The correct step is to discontinue hydroquinone immediately.
The core competency being tested across melasma questions is the ability to integrate patient demographics (reproductive-age woman, darker skin type, hormonal exposure) with a pattern-recognition diagnosis, select the appropriate workup (Wood's lamp classification), and sequence management correctly (photoprotection first, then tailored pharmacotherapy with awareness of contraindications).