Reaksi Kusta
Published on September 18, 2026
Risk Factors
Patients with multibacillary leprosy (lepromatous [LL] or borderline lepromatous [BL]); high bacterial index on slit-skin smear; may be triggered by initiation of multidrug therapy (MDT), infections, pregnancy, stress, or vaccination
Etiology
Type III hypersensitivity (immune complex-mediated) reaction to Mycobacterium leprae antigens; deposition of antigen-antibody complexes in tissues with complement activation and neutrophil recruitment
Presentation
Sudden onset of crops of tender, erythematous subcutaneous nodules with fever, malaise, and potential multisystem involvement (arthralgia, neuritis, orchitis, iridocyclitis)
Classic Exam
Multiple painful red nodules on the face and extensor surfaces of limbs; skin lesions may vesiculate or ulcerate; tender thickened peripheral nerves; testicular tenderness in males; painful red eye if iridocyclitis is present
Diagnostics
Clinical diagnosis in context of known leprosy; skin biopsy shows neutrophilic infiltration with vasculitis in the dermis; elevated ESR and CRP; leukocytosis with neutrophilia; high bacterial index on slit-skin smear
Management
Continue MDT throughout the reaction. Mild: rest and NSAIDs. Moderate to severe: prednisolone (starting 40 to 60 mg/day, tapered over 12 weeks). Severe or recurrent: thalidomide 100 to 400 mg/day (drug of choice but absolutely contraindicated in pregnancy). Clofazimine 300 mg/day as steroid-sparing agent
Keywords
"Crops of tender red nodules," "patient on MDT for leprosy," "fever with new skin nodules in lepromatous leprosy," "immune complex deposition," "neutrophilic infiltrate on biopsy," "thalidomide for recurrent reaction"
01Pathophysiology
ENL is fundamentally a Type III hypersensitivity reaction (Arthus-type), and understanding this mechanism is the key to answering questions about it correctly.
In lepromatous and borderline lepromatous leprosy, the patient has a defective cell-mediated immune response against M. leprae, which allows the organism to proliferate unchecked to very high numbers. This produces a large pool of circulating mycobacterial antigens. When these antigens combine with host antibodies (primarily IgG and IgM), they form circulating immune complexes. These complexes deposit in small blood vessels and tissues throughout the body, including the skin, peripheral nerves, eyes, joints, lymph nodes, kidneys, and testes.
Once deposited, the immune complexes activate the complement cascade (particularly C3a and C5a), generating chemotactic signals that recruit neutrophils to the site. Neutrophil degranulation releases proteolytic enzymes and reactive oxygen species, causing direct tissue injury. Simultaneously, there is a surge in tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and other pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, IL-8), which accounts for the systemic symptoms of fever, malaise, and the acute inflammatory character of the skin lesions.
This pathophysiology directly explains the clinical picture: the tender erythematous nodules represent neutrophil-rich inflammation around immune complex deposits in the dermis and subcutis. The vasculitis component explains why lesions can vesiculate, become hemorrhagic, or even ulcerate. The systemic deposition of complexes in distant organs explains why ENL is not merely a skin disease but a multisystem inflammatory syndrome. Glomerulonephritis results from renal immune complex deposition, orchitis from testicular involvement, and iridocyclitis from ocular deposition.
A critical concept to remember: ENL can occur before, during, or after completion of MDT. It is not a sign of treatment failure. Rather, the killing of bacilli by MDT releases large quantities of antigen, which paradoxically fuels more immune complex formation. This is why MDT must never be stopped during a reaction.
02Classification and Clinical Manifestation
Lepra Reactions: Type Comparison
Immune Mechanism
Type 1 Reaction (Reversal Reaction)
Type IV (delayed-type, cell-mediated)
Type 2 Reaction (ENL)
Type III (immune complex-mediated)
Type 3 (Lucio Phenomenon)
Severe necrotizing vasculitis with immune complex deposition
Leprosy Subtype
Type 1 Reaction (Reversal Reaction)
Borderline spectrum (BT, BB, BL)
Type 2 Reaction (ENL)
LL and BL
Type 3 (Lucio Phenomenon)
Diffuse non-nodular lepromatous leprosy (Lucio leprosy)
Skin Findings
Type 1 Reaction (Reversal Reaction)
Existing lesions become erythematous, edematous, and inflamed; no new lesions
Type 2 Reaction (ENL)
New crops of tender erythematous nodules on previously uninvolved skin
Type 3 (Lucio Phenomenon)
Irregular, painful purpuric patches that progress to hemorrhagic bullae and necrotic ulcers
Histology
Type 1 Reaction (Reversal Reaction)
Granulomatous inflammation with lymphocytic and epithelioid cell infiltrate
Type 2 Reaction (ENL)
Neutrophilic infiltration, vasculitis, immune complex deposition
Type 3 (Lucio Phenomenon)
Necrotizing vasculitis with endothelial proliferation, heavy bacillary load in vessel walls
Systemic Symptoms
Type 1 Reaction (Reversal Reaction)
Neuritis (can be severe), but less systemic illness
Type 2 Reaction (ENL)
Fever, malaise, arthralgia, neuritis, orchitis, iridocyclitis, nephritis
Type 3 (Lucio Phenomenon)
Severe systemic toxicity, secondary infections, high mortality
Feature | Type 1 Reaction (Reversal Reaction) | Type 2 Reaction (ENL) | Type 3 (Lucio Phenomenon) |
|---|---|---|---|
Immune Mechanism | Type IV (delayed-type, cell-mediated) | Type III (immune complex-mediated) | Severe necrotizing vasculitis with immune complex deposition |
Leprosy Subtype | Borderline spectrum (BT, BB, BL) | LL and BL | Diffuse non-nodular lepromatous leprosy (Lucio leprosy) |
Skin Findings | Existing lesions become erythematous, edematous, and inflamed; no new lesions | New crops of tender erythematous nodules on previously uninvolved skin | Irregular, painful purpuric patches that progress to hemorrhagic bullae and necrotic ulcers |
Histology | Granulomatous inflammation with lymphocytic and epithelioid cell infiltrate | Neutrophilic infiltration, vasculitis, immune complex deposition | Necrotizing vasculitis with endothelial proliferation, heavy bacillary load in vessel walls |
Systemic Symptoms | Neuritis (can be severe), but less systemic illness | Fever, malaise, arthralgia, neuritis, orchitis, iridocyclitis, nephritis | Severe systemic toxicity, secondary infections, high mortality |
ENL Severity Classification
Severity | Clinical Features |
|---|---|
Mild | Few scattered nodules; no fever; no neuritis or organ involvement |
Moderate | Multiple nodules; low-grade fever; nerve tenderness present; mild arthralgia |
Severe | Extensive nodules (may ulcerate); high fever; significant neuritis with motor/sensory loss; iridocyclitis; orchitis/epididymitis; glomerulonephritis; hepatosplenomegaly |
Chronic/Recurrent | Repeated episodes over months to years; often becomes steroid-dependent; highest risk of cumulative nerve damage |
Organ-System Involvement
System | Manifestation |
|---|---|
Skin | Crops of tender red nodules, may vesiculate or ulcerate |
Peripheral nerves | Acute neuritis with pain, tenderness, and new motor or sensory deficits |
Eyes | Iridocyclitis (painful red eye with photophobia) |
Joints | Polyarthralgia or frank polyarthritis |
Lymph nodes | Generalized tender lymphadenopathy |
Testes | Orchitis and epididymitis (can lead to infertility and gynecomastia) |
Kidneys | Immune complex glomerulonephritis (proteinuria, hematuria) |
Liver/Spleen | Hepatosplenomegaly in severe cases |
03Diagnostic Workup
Summary Table
Clinical assessment
Role
Best initial "test"
Expected Finding
Crops of tender erythematous nodules + systemic symptoms in a patient with known multibacillary leprosy
Slit-skin smear
Role
Confirms multibacillary disease
Expected Finding
High bacterial index (BI 4+ to 6+)
Skin biopsy
Role
Most accurate / confirmatory test
Expected Finding
Neutrophilic infiltrate in dermis and subcutis, vasculitis, immune complex deposition; fragmented bacilli may be seen
CBC
Role
Supportive
Expected Finding
Leukocytosis with neutrophilia
ESR / CRP
Role
Supportive
Expected Finding
Elevated, reflecting systemic inflammation
Urinalysis
Role
Screen for renal involvement
Expected Finding
Proteinuria, hematuria if glomerulonephritis present
Serum TNF-alpha
Role
Research / adjunctive (not routine)
Expected Finding
Markedly elevated during ENL episodes
Test | Role | Expected Finding |
|---|---|---|
Clinical assessment | Best initial "test" | Crops of tender erythematous nodules + systemic symptoms in a patient with known multibacillary leprosy |
Slit-skin smear | Confirms multibacillary disease | High bacterial index (BI 4+ to 6+) |
Skin biopsy | Most accurate / confirmatory test | Neutrophilic infiltrate in dermis and subcutis, vasculitis, immune complex deposition; fragmented bacilli may be seen |
CBC | Supportive | Leukocytosis with neutrophilia |
ESR / CRP | Supportive | Elevated, reflecting systemic inflammation |
Urinalysis | Screen for renal involvement | Proteinuria, hematuria if glomerulonephritis present |
Serum TNF-alpha | Research / adjunctive (not routine) | Markedly elevated during ENL episodes |
The diagnosis of ENL is primarily clinical. A patient with established lepromatous or borderline lepromatous leprosy who develops new crops of tender red nodules with systemic features (fever, joint pain, nerve pain) has ENL until proven otherwise. The clinical context is your most important diagnostic tool.
The slit-skin smear should already be part of the patient's leprosy workup. In ENL patients, the bacterial index is characteristically high (BI 4+ to 6+), confirming multibacillary disease. This test does not diagnose the reaction itself but confirms the type of leprosy that makes ENL possible.
Skin biopsy is the gold standard when the diagnosis is uncertain or when you need to distinguish ENL from a Type 1 reversal reaction. The hallmark finding is dense neutrophilic infiltration of the dermis and subcutaneous tissue, often accompanied by small-vessel vasculitis and evidence of immune complex deposition. This contrasts sharply with the granulomatous, lymphocyte-rich pattern of a Type 1 reaction. Immunofluorescence may show granular deposits of immunoglobulin and complement along vessel walls, confirming immune complex-mediated injury.
Laboratory studies are supportive, not diagnostic. Elevated ESR and CRP reflect systemic inflammation. A complete blood count typically shows leukocytosis with neutrophilia. In patients with severe or recurrent ENL, check urinalysis for proteinuria and hematuria to screen for glomerulonephritis, and perform a slit-lamp examination if ocular symptoms are present.
04Management and Treatment
All cases
First-Line Treatment
Continue MDT
Alternative / Adjunct
Do not stop or modify MDT
Key Notes
Stopping MDT does not prevent reactions and worsens long-term outcomes
Mild
First-Line Treatment
Rest, analgesics, NSAIDs (e.g., ibuprofen 400 mg TID)
Alternative / Adjunct
Aspirin 600 mg every 4 to 6 hours
Key Notes
Often self-limiting within days
Moderate
First-Line Treatment
Prednisolone 40 to 60 mg/day (or 0.5 to 1 mg/kg/day), tapered over 12 weeks
Alternative / Adjunct
Add clofazimine 300 mg/day as steroid-sparing agent
Key Notes
Monitor for steroid side effects; taper must be slow to avoid rebound
Severe / Recurrent
First-Line Treatment
Thalidomide 300 to 400 mg/day initially, then taper to 50 to 100 mg/day maintenance
Alternative / Adjunct
Prednisolone if thalidomide unavailable or contraindicated
Key Notes
Absolutely contraindicated in women of childbearing potential (teratogenic: phocomelia)
Women of childbearing age with severe ENL
First-Line Treatment
Prednisolone + clofazimine 300 mg/day (up to 12 months max, then reduce to 100 mg/day)
Alternative / Adjunct
Pentoxifylline 400 mg TID (TNF-alpha inhibitor)
Key Notes
Thalidomide cannot be used; clofazimine takes 4 to 6 weeks to reach anti-inflammatory effect
Neuritis
First-Line Treatment
Prednisolone mandatory regardless of ENL severity
Alternative / Adjunct
Splinting of affected limb
Key Notes
Nerve damage is the most feared complication; treat aggressively
Iridocyclitis
First-Line Treatment
Topical corticosteroids + mydriatics (atropine)
Alternative / Adjunct
Ophthalmology referral
Key Notes
Prevent posterior synechiae and vision loss
Severity | First-Line Treatment | Alternative / Adjunct | Key Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
All cases | Continue MDT | Do not stop or modify MDT | Stopping MDT does not prevent reactions and worsens long-term outcomes |
Mild | Rest, analgesics, NSAIDs (e.g., ibuprofen 400 mg TID) | Aspirin 600 mg every 4 to 6 hours | Often self-limiting within days |
Moderate | Prednisolone 40 to 60 mg/day (or 0.5 to 1 mg/kg/day), tapered over 12 weeks | Add clofazimine 300 mg/day as steroid-sparing agent | Monitor for steroid side effects; taper must be slow to avoid rebound |
Severe / Recurrent | Thalidomide 300 to 400 mg/day initially, then taper to 50 to 100 mg/day maintenance | Prednisolone if thalidomide unavailable or contraindicated | Absolutely contraindicated in women of childbearing potential (teratogenic: phocomelia) |
Women of childbearing age with severe ENL | Prednisolone + clofazimine 300 mg/day (up to 12 months max, then reduce to 100 mg/day) | Pentoxifylline 400 mg TID (TNF-alpha inhibitor) | Thalidomide cannot be used; clofazimine takes 4 to 6 weeks to reach anti-inflammatory effect |
Neuritis | Prednisolone mandatory regardless of ENL severity | Splinting of affected limb | Nerve damage is the most feared complication; treat aggressively |
Iridocyclitis | Topical corticosteroids + mydriatics (atropine) | Ophthalmology referral | Prevent posterior synechiae and vision loss |
Step 1: Do not stop MDT. This is the single most tested principle. A vignette may describe a patient developing ENL while on treatment, and one of the answer choices will be "discontinue MDT." This is always wrong. MDT treats the underlying infection and must continue throughout the reaction.
Step 2: Assess severity. The next best step depends on whether the reaction is mild, moderate, or severe. For mild ENL with only a few nodules and no systemic symptoms, NSAIDs and rest are sufficient. Most mild episodes resolve within a few days.
Step 3: Initiate corticosteroids for moderate to severe ENL. Prednisolone is the first-line anti-inflammatory agent. Start at 40 to 60 mg/day as a single morning dose. The total duration of the taper should be at least 12 weeks according to WHO guidelines. A common tapering schedule reduces the dose by 5 to 10 mg every 2 weeks. Rapid tapers lead to rebound reactions, which is a frequently tested pitfall. Patients on prolonged steroids need monitoring for hyperglycemia, osteoporosis, and opportunistic infections.
Step 4: Thalidomide for severe or chronic recurrent ENL. Thalidomide is the drug of choice for severe and recurrent ENL because it directly inhibits TNF-alpha production, the central cytokine driving ENL inflammation. The initial dose is 300 to 400 mg/day, given at bedtime due to sedative effects. Once symptoms are controlled (usually within 48 to 72 hours), taper gradually to a maintenance dose of 50 to 100 mg/day. Response to thalidomide is often dramatic and rapid, which itself is a diagnostic clue in ambiguous cases.
The critical contraindication: thalidomide is an absolute teratogen (FDA Category X). It causes phocomelia (limb reduction defects) and other severe birth defects. In women of reproductive age, it must never be prescribed unless pregnancy is completely excluded and two forms of contraception are in place. In many clinical settings, especially where pregnancy testing is unreliable, thalidomide is simply avoided in this population.
Step 5: Alternatives when thalidomide is contraindicated. For women of childbearing potential with severe or recurrent ENL, increase clofazimine to 300 mg/day (the maximum recommended dose). Clofazimine has intrinsic anti-inflammatory properties through inhibition of neutrophil motility and complement activation. However, it takes 4 to 6 weeks to achieve its anti-inflammatory effect, so it must be used alongside corticosteroids during the acute phase. The maximum duration at 300 mg/day is 12 months, after which it should be reduced to 100 mg/day to minimize skin discoloration (reddish-brown pigmentation). Pentoxifylline (400 mg three times daily) is another adjunctive option that inhibits TNF-alpha, though evidence is less robust than for thalidomide.
Step 6: Manage organ-threatening complications. Any evidence of neuritis warrants prednisolone regardless of overall ENL severity, because nerve damage can become irreversible within hours to days. Iridocyclitis requires topical steroids and atropine drops to prevent synechiae. Orchitis may require scrotal support and analgesics in addition to systemic steroids.
05Differential Diagnosis and Distractors
Type 1 Lepra Reaction (Reversal Reaction)
Why It Is Similar
Both occur in leprosy patients and present with acute skin inflammation and neuritis
Key Discriminator
Type 1 causes inflammation of existing lesions (they swell and redden); ENL produces new nodules on previously normal skin. Type 1 has granulomatous histology; ENL has neutrophilic infiltrate. Type 1 occurs in borderline disease; ENL occurs in lepromatous/BL disease
Erythema Nodosum (non-leprosy)
Why It Is Similar
Both present with tender subcutaneous nodules, often on the lower extremities
Key Discriminator
Classic erythema nodosum is bilateral and pretibial, usually associated with sarcoidosis, streptococcal infection, IBD, or medications. Biopsy shows septal panniculitis without vasculitis. No history of leprosy or high bacterial index
Lucio Phenomenon (Type 3 Reaction)
Why It Is Similar
Both occur in lepromatous leprosy with systemic symptoms
Key Discriminator
Lucio phenomenon presents with irregular purpuric patches that progress to hemorrhagic bullae and necrotic ulcers, not discrete tender nodules. It occurs in diffuse non-nodular lepromatous leprosy (Lucio leprosy) and has high mortality
Sweet Syndrome (Acute Febrile Neutrophilic Dermatosis)
Why It Is Similar
Both present with tender erythematous skin lesions, fever, neutrophilia, and neutrophilic infiltrate on biopsy
Key Discriminator
Sweet syndrome has well-demarcated, raised, violaceous plaques (not deep subcutaneous nodules). It is associated with hematologic malignancies, not leprosy. No history of Hansen disease
Drug Reaction (e.g., dapsone hypersensitivity)
Why It Is Similar
Both can present with fever, skin lesions, and systemic symptoms in a leprosy patient on MDT
Key Discriminator
Dapsone hypersensitivity typically occurs within 6 weeks of starting therapy and presents with exfoliative dermatitis, hepatitis, lymphadenopathy, and mononucleosis-like syndrome. Skin findings are diffuse erythema or exfoliation, not discrete nodules
Polyarteritis Nodosa (PAN)
Why It Is Similar
Both cause tender subcutaneous nodules, systemic symptoms, and vasculitis on biopsy
Key Discriminator
PAN shows medium-vessel necrotizing vasculitis (not small-vessel), often with livedo reticularis, renal artery aneurysms, and peripheral neuropathy (mononeuritis multiplex). Not associated with leprosy or high bacterial index
Differential | Why It Is Similar | Key Discriminator |
|---|---|---|
Type 1 Lepra Reaction (Reversal Reaction) | Both occur in leprosy patients and present with acute skin inflammation and neuritis | Type 1 causes inflammation of existing lesions (they swell and redden); ENL produces new nodules on previously normal skin. Type 1 has granulomatous histology; ENL has neutrophilic infiltrate. Type 1 occurs in borderline disease; ENL occurs in lepromatous/BL disease |
Erythema Nodosum (non-leprosy) | Both present with tender subcutaneous nodules, often on the lower extremities | Classic erythema nodosum is bilateral and pretibial, usually associated with sarcoidosis, streptococcal infection, IBD, or medications. Biopsy shows septal panniculitis without vasculitis. No history of leprosy or high bacterial index |
Lucio Phenomenon (Type 3 Reaction) | Both occur in lepromatous leprosy with systemic symptoms | Lucio phenomenon presents with irregular purpuric patches that progress to hemorrhagic bullae and necrotic ulcers, not discrete tender nodules. It occurs in diffuse non-nodular lepromatous leprosy (Lucio leprosy) and has high mortality |
Sweet Syndrome (Acute Febrile Neutrophilic Dermatosis) | Both present with tender erythematous skin lesions, fever, neutrophilia, and neutrophilic infiltrate on biopsy | Sweet syndrome has well-demarcated, raised, violaceous plaques (not deep subcutaneous nodules). It is associated with hematologic malignancies, not leprosy. No history of Hansen disease |
Drug Reaction (e.g., dapsone hypersensitivity) | Both can present with fever, skin lesions, and systemic symptoms in a leprosy patient on MDT | Dapsone hypersensitivity typically occurs within 6 weeks of starting therapy and presents with exfoliative dermatitis, hepatitis, lymphadenopathy, and mononucleosis-like syndrome. Skin findings are diffuse erythema or exfoliation, not discrete nodules |
Polyarteritis Nodosa (PAN) | Both cause tender subcutaneous nodules, systemic symptoms, and vasculitis on biopsy | PAN shows medium-vessel necrotizing vasculitis (not small-vessel), often with livedo reticularis, renal artery aneurysms, and peripheral neuropathy (mononeuritis multiplex). Not associated with leprosy or high bacterial index |
06Traps and High-Yield Pearls
The most common mistake students make with ENL is confusing it with a Type 1 reversal reaction. Both are lepra reactions. Both can cause neuritis. Both are tested frequently. But they differ in every way that matters for the exam: the immune mechanism (Type III vs. Type IV), the leprosy subtype (LL/BL vs. borderline spectrum), the skin findings (new nodules vs. inflamed old lesions), the biopsy (neutrophils vs. granulomas), and the treatment of choice for refractory cases (thalidomide vs. corticosteroids alone). When a vignette describes a leprosy patient with "new crops of tender red nodules" and fever, the answer is ENL. When it describes "swelling and reddening of pre-existing hypopigmented patches," the answer is a reversal reaction.
The second trap involves stopping MDT during a reaction. This is a classic distractor answer. Students reason that since MDT may precipitate the reaction, stopping it should help. It does not. MDT must continue, and examiners specifically test whether you know this.
The third trap centers on thalidomide and pregnancy. A vignette may describe a young woman with severe recurrent ENL who has failed corticosteroids. The temptation is to choose thalidomide because it is the most effective drug. But if the patient is of reproductive age without confirmed contraception, thalidomide is absolutely wrong. The correct answer in this scenario is high-dose clofazimine with continued corticosteroids, or pentoxifylline as an adjunct.
Finally, remember that ENL is a multisystem disease, not just a skin condition. A question may focus on orchitis, glomerulonephritis, or iridocyclitis in a leprosy patient without emphasizing the skin nodules. Recognizing that these organ manifestations are part of ENL (immune complex deposition in multiple tissues) is the core competency being tested.