Trauma Kimia
Published on September 24, 2026
Risk Factors
Industrial workers (chemical plants, construction, laboratories), household exposure (drain cleaners, bleach, oven cleaners), assault victims, children with unsupervised access to cleaning agents
Etiology
Tissue destruction from contact with acids (pH < 2), alkalis (pH > 11.5), or other corrosive agents (organic compounds, oxidizing/reducing agents). Severity depends on agent type, concentration, duration of contact, volume, and body area involved
Presentation
Pain at contact site, skin erythema/blistering/necrosis. Alkali burns may present with a deceptively painless onset. Possible airway compromise if inhalation is involved. Ocular burns present with severe pain, tearing, blepharospasm, and vision loss
Classic Exam
Acid burns: white/yellow coagulated eschar with well-demarcated borders. Alkali burns: grayish, soft, soapy ("slippery") wound with poorly defined margins and deeper tissue destruction. Sulfuric acid: black eschar. Ocular: corneal haze, conjunctival blanching, perilimbal ischemia
Diagnostics
Wound pH (litmus paper), CBC, BMP (electrolytes, calcium, magnesium for HF burns), ABG/lactate, urinalysis (myoglobinuria in deep burns), ECG (for hydrofluoric acid exposure). Ocular: slit-lamp examination with fluorescein staining
Management
Immediate copious water irrigation (minimum 15 to 30 minutes). Remove contaminated clothing. Do NOT attempt neutralization. Treat as standard burn (Parkland formula for resuscitation if indicated). HF burns: topical 2.5% calcium gluconate gel. Ocular burns: continuous irrigation until pH normalizes to 7.0 to 7.4
Keywords
"Soapy feel," "liquefactive necrosis," "coagulative necrosis," "copious irrigation," "do not neutralize," "calcium gluconate," "perilimbal ischemia," "cement burn," "drain cleaner"
01Pathophysiology
Chemical burns differ fundamentally from thermal burns in one critical way: the injuring agent continues destroying tissue as long as it remains in contact with the body. In thermal burns, the damage is essentially instantaneous upon removal from heat. In chemical burns, the chemical reaction is ongoing, making time-to-decontamination the single most important prognostic factor.
The mechanisms of tissue injury can be broadly divided by the nature of the chemical agent. Acids (pH < 2) act as proton donors. They denature and coagulate tissue proteins, producing coagulative necrosis. The coagulated protein forms a tough, leathery eschar that paradoxically acts as a barrier, limiting further penetration of the acid into deeper tissues. This is why acid burns, while painful and destructive, tend to be more self-limiting in depth. The exception to this rule is hydrofluoric acid (HF), which behaves unlike other acids and instead produces liquefactive necrosis with deep tissue penetration.
Alkalis (pH > 11.5) act as proton acceptors. They cause injury through three concurrent processes. First, saponification of cell membrane lipids disrupts the permeability barrier of the skin, allowing the agent to penetrate deeper. Second, alkaline hydrolysis of structural proteins produces liquefactive necrosis, in which cells liquefy and dissolve rather than forming a protective barrier. Third, hygroscopic tissue dehydration extracts water from cells, compounding the destruction. Because liquefactive necrosis does not create a coagulum to stop the agent, alkali burns penetrate far deeper and are generally more severe than acid burns at equivalent concentrations and contact times. The wound often has a characteristic "soapy" or slippery texture due to the saponification of subcutaneous fat.
Beyond dermal injury, chemical burns can produce systemic toxicity depending on the agent. HF acid exposure causes the fluoride ion to chelate serum calcium and magnesium, resulting in hypocalcemia, hypomagnesemia, and hyperkalemia, which can lead to fatal cardiac arrhythmias. Burns involving more than 25 square inches (approximately 160 cm) of HF exposure or any concentration above 50% carry a high risk of systemic toxicity. In burns covering more than 30% total body surface area (TBSA), the systemic inflammatory response leads to capillary leak, massive fluid shifts, and hypovolemic shock, following the same pathophysiology as severe thermal burns. Additionally, rhabdomyolysis can occur in deep chemical burns, with myoglobin precipitating in renal tubules and causing acute kidney injury.
02Classification of Chemical Burns
Burn Depth Classification
Epidermal (1st degree)
CLINICAL APPEARANCE
Erythema, no blisters
SENSATION
Painful
HEALING
Heals within 7 days without scarring
Superficial dermal (2nd degree, superficial)
CLINICAL APPEARANCE
Blisters, moist pink wound bed, blanches with pressure
SENSATION
Very painful
HEALING
Heals within 14 days, minimal scarring
Deep dermal (2nd degree, deep)
CLINICAL APPEARANCE
Mottled pink/white, does not blanch, may have ruptured blisters
SENSATION
Reduced sensation
HEALING
Heals in 3 to 9 weeks, hypertrophic scarring likely, may require grafting
Full thickness (3rd degree)
CLINICAL APPEARANCE
White, waxy, brown, or charred; leathery eschar; no blisters
SENSATION
Absent (nerve destruction)
HEALING
Will not heal spontaneously; requires excision and grafting
Subdermal (4th degree)
CLINICAL APPEARANCE
Exposed fat, muscle, tendon, or bone
SENSATION
Absent
HEALING
Requires flap coverage or amputation
DEPTH | CLINICAL APPEARANCE | SENSATION | HEALING |
|---|---|---|---|
Epidermal (1st degree) | Erythema, no blisters | Painful | Heals within 7 days without scarring |
Superficial dermal (2nd degree, superficial) | Blisters, moist pink wound bed, blanches with pressure | Very painful | Heals within 14 days, minimal scarring |
Deep dermal (2nd degree, deep) | Mottled pink/white, does not blanch, may have ruptured blisters | Reduced sensation | Heals in 3 to 9 weeks, hypertrophic scarring likely, may require grafting |
Full thickness (3rd degree) | White, waxy, brown, or charred; leathery eschar; no blisters | Absent (nerve destruction) | Will not heal spontaneously; requires excision and grafting |
Subdermal (4th degree) | Exposed fat, muscle, tendon, or bone | Absent | Requires flap coverage or amputation |
A critical exam point: chemical burns often appear deceptively superficial on initial presentation. The full depth of the injury may not declare itself for 48 to 72 hours, especially with alkali burns. Cement burns are notorious for this, as workers may be unaware of the alkaline injury until hours after exposure, by which time deep dermal or full-thickness injury has already occurred.
Roper-Hall Classification (Ocular Chemical Burns)
This is the most tested classification for ocular chemical injuries. It grades severity based on corneal haze and perilimbal ischemia.
I
CORNEAL FINDINGS
Corneal epithelial damage only, clear stroma
LIMBAL ISCHEMIA
None
PROGNOSIS
Good
II
CORNEAL FINDINGS
Corneal haze present, iris details visible
LIMBAL ISCHEMIA
Less than 1/3 of limbus
PROGNOSIS
Good
III
CORNEAL FINDINGS
Total epithelial loss, stromal haze obscuring iris details
LIMBAL ISCHEMIA
1/3 to 1/2 of limbus
PROGNOSIS
Guarded
IV
CORNEAL FINDINGS
Cornea opaque, iris and pupil not visible
LIMBAL ISCHEMIA
More than 1/2 of limbus
PROGNOSIS
Poor
GRADE | CORNEAL FINDINGS | LIMBAL ISCHEMIA | PROGNOSIS |
|---|---|---|---|
I | Corneal epithelial damage only, clear stroma | None | Good |
II | Corneal haze present, iris details visible | Less than 1/3 of limbus | Good |
III | Total epithelial loss, stromal haze obscuring iris details | 1/3 to 1/2 of limbus | Guarded |
IV | Cornea opaque, iris and pupil not visible | More than 1/2 of limbus | Poor |
The Dua classification subdivides the old Grade IV into Grades IV, V, and VI based on the clock hours of limbal involvement and percentage of conjunctival involvement, providing a more nuanced prognosis for severe injuries. For exam purposes, know both systems, but Roper-Hall is the more commonly tested framework.
Classification by Causative Agent
Acids
EXAMPLES
HCl, , , acetic acid
MECHANISM
Coagulative necrosis, protein denaturation
CLINICAL FEATURE
Well-demarcated eschar; self-limiting depth
Alkalis
EXAMPLES
NaOH, KOH, (cement/lime), ammonia, bleach
MECHANISM
Liquefactive necrosis, fat saponification, protein hydrolysis
CLINICAL FEATURE
Soapy/slippery feel; deep penetration; poorly defined margins
Hydrofluoric acid (HF)
EXAMPLES
Glass etching, electronics manufacturing
MECHANISM
Liquefactive necrosis (unlike other acids); fluoride ion chelates and
CLINICAL FEATURE
Disproportionate pain out of proportion to visible wound; systemic hypocalcemia; cardiac arrest risk
Organic compounds
EXAMPLES
Phenol, cresol, petroleum products
MECHANISM
Coagulative necrosis and fat dissolution
CLINICAL FEATURE
Phenol: painless white discoloration followed by gangrene
Oxidizing agents
EXAMPLES
Chromic acid, sodium hypochlorite
MECHANISM
Protein disruption via oxidation
CLINICAL FEATURE
Varying presentations depending on concentration
Reducing agents
EXAMPLES
Hydrochloric acid, nitric acid
MECHANISM
Protein binding and denaturation
CLINICAL FEATURE
Ulceration and eschar formation
Alkali metals
EXAMPLES
Lithium, sodium, potassium, magnesium (elemental)
MECHANISM
React exothermically with water, producing combined chemical and thermal injury
CLINICAL FEATURE
Do NOT irrigate with water; cover with mineral oil and remove with forceps
AGENT TYPE | EXAMPLES | MECHANISM | CLINICAL FEATURE |
|---|---|---|---|
Acids | HCl, , , acetic acid | Coagulative necrosis, protein denaturation | Well-demarcated eschar; self-limiting depth |
Alkalis | NaOH, KOH, (cement/lime), ammonia, bleach | Liquefactive necrosis, fat saponification, protein hydrolysis | Soapy/slippery feel; deep penetration; poorly defined margins |
Hydrofluoric acid (HF) | Glass etching, electronics manufacturing | Liquefactive necrosis (unlike other acids); fluoride ion chelates and | Disproportionate pain out of proportion to visible wound; systemic hypocalcemia; cardiac arrest risk |
Organic compounds | Phenol, cresol, petroleum products | Coagulative necrosis and fat dissolution | Phenol: painless white discoloration followed by gangrene |
Oxidizing agents | Chromic acid, sodium hypochlorite | Protein disruption via oxidation | Varying presentations depending on concentration |
Reducing agents | Hydrochloric acid, nitric acid | Protein binding and denaturation | Ulceration and eschar formation |
Alkali metals | Lithium, sodium, potassium, magnesium (elemental) | React exothermically with water, producing combined chemical and thermal injury | Do NOT irrigate with water; cover with mineral oil and remove with forceps |
03Diagnostic Workup
Wound surface pH (litmus paper)
PURPOSE
Confirm chemical agent neutralization; guide duration of irrigation
TIMING
Immediately and serially during irrigation
CBC
PURPOSE
Baseline hematocrit; leukocytosis indicating systemic response
TIMING
On arrival
BMP (electrolytes, BUN, creatinine)
PURPOSE
Detect electrolyte abnormalities; renal function
TIMING
On arrival; repeat every 4 to 6 hours in severe burns
Serum calcium, magnesium
PURPOSE
Essential for HF acid burns to detect life-threatening hypocalcemia and hypomagnesemia
TIMING
On arrival for any HF exposure; repeat serially
ABG with lactate
PURPOSE
Assess acid-base status; elevated lactate raises suspicion for cyanide toxicity in combined burns
TIMING
On arrival
Urinalysis
PURPOSE
Detect myoglobinuria (dark/pigmented urine) indicating rhabdomyolysis
TIMING
On arrival
ECG
PURPOSE
Detect arrhythmias from hyperkalemia or hypocalcemia (prolonged QT, ST changes) in HF burns
TIMING
Immediately for any HF acid exposure
CK (creatine kinase)
PURPOSE
Confirm rhabdomyolysis in deep chemical burns
TIMING
On arrival; trend every 6 to 12 hours
Slit-lamp examination with fluorescein
PURPOSE
Evaluate corneal integrity and limbal ischemia in ocular burns
TIMING
After initial irrigation and pH normalization
CXR
PURPOSE
Evaluate for pulmonary edema in inhalational chemical exposure
TIMING
On arrival if inhalation suspected
TEST | PURPOSE | TIMING |
|---|---|---|
Wound surface pH (litmus paper) | Confirm chemical agent neutralization; guide duration of irrigation | Immediately and serially during irrigation |
CBC | Baseline hematocrit; leukocytosis indicating systemic response | On arrival |
BMP (electrolytes, BUN, creatinine) | Detect electrolyte abnormalities; renal function | On arrival; repeat every 4 to 6 hours in severe burns |
Serum calcium, magnesium | Essential for HF acid burns to detect life-threatening hypocalcemia and hypomagnesemia | On arrival for any HF exposure; repeat serially |
ABG with lactate | Assess acid-base status; elevated lactate raises suspicion for cyanide toxicity in combined burns | On arrival |
Urinalysis | Detect myoglobinuria (dark/pigmented urine) indicating rhabdomyolysis | On arrival |
ECG | Detect arrhythmias from hyperkalemia or hypocalcemia (prolonged QT, ST changes) in HF burns | Immediately for any HF acid exposure |
CK (creatine kinase) | Confirm rhabdomyolysis in deep chemical burns | On arrival; trend every 6 to 12 hours |
Slit-lamp examination with fluorescein | Evaluate corneal integrity and limbal ischemia in ocular burns | After initial irrigation and pH normalization |
CXR | Evaluate for pulmonary edema in inhalational chemical exposure | On arrival if inhalation suspected |
The Best Initial Step for any chemical burn is not a diagnostic test at all. It is immediate copious irrigation with water. Do not delay decontamination to perform any diagnostic workup. The only exception is elemental alkali metals (lithium, sodium, potassium, magnesium), which react exothermically with water and should instead be covered with mineral oil and physically removed with forceps.
The workup proceeds in parallel once irrigation is initiated. For cutaneous burns, wound pH should be checked periodically during irrigation using litmus paper. The goal is a neutral pH of 7.0. For acid burns, irrigation for 15 to 30 minutes is often sufficient. For alkali burns, irrigation may need to continue for 60 minutes or longer because the liquefactive mechanism allows the chemical to persist in deeper tissue layers.
For ocular burns, the irrigating fluid should flow from nasal to lateral to prevent contamination of the unaffected eye. Up to 20 liters of irrigation fluid may be required. After pH normalization (checked in the inferior conjunctival fornix), proceed to slit-lamp examination with fluorescein staining to assess corneal epithelial defects, stromal haze, and limbal ischemia, then grade using the Roper-Hall or Dua classification.
For HF acid burns, the workup prioritizes electrolytes and cardiac monitoring. An ECG must be obtained immediately. Serum calcium and magnesium should be checked and trended. Even a burn that looks minor can produce fatal systemic toxicity through fluoride-ion-mediated hypocalcemia and hyperkalemia. A QTc prolongation or widened QRS on ECG is an ominous sign requiring emergent IV calcium replacement.
04Management and Treatment
Acute Management Summary
1. Scene safety and PPE
ACTION
Protect rescuers from chemical contamination
DETAILS
Gloves, goggles, gown; remove patient from source
2. Remove contaminated clothing
ACTION
Strip all clothing and jewelry in contact with the agent
DETAILS
Do not pull clothing over the head if face is involved; cut it off
3. Copious water irrigation
ACTION
Begin within 10 minutes ideally; use low-pressure tap water
DETAILS
Acids: minimum 15 to 30 minutes. Alkalis: minimum 60 minutes. Continue until wound pH is 7.0
4. Do NOT neutralize
ACTION
Never apply an acid to neutralize an alkali or vice versa
DETAILS
Neutralization reactions are exothermic and cause additional thermal injury
5. Brush dry chemicals first
ACTION
Powdered agents (e.g., dry lime) should be mechanically removed before irrigation
DETAILS
Water activates some dry chemicals and worsens the burn
6. Airway assessment
ACTION
Evaluate for stridor, hoarseness, facial burns, soot
DETAILS
Consider early intubation if inhalational exposure is suspected
7. Fluid resuscitation
ACTION
Use the Parkland formula for burns involving more than 20% TBSA
DETAILS
. Give 50% in the first 8 hours, 50% over the next 16 hours. Use lactated Ringer's solution. Titrate to urine output of 0.5 to 1 mL/kg/hr in adults (1 to 2 mL/kg/hr in children)
8. Pain management
ACTION
IV opioids (morphine 0.1 mg/kg IV titrated)
DETAILS
Avoid analgesics in HF burns until the pain endpoint can be used to assess treatment response
9. Tetanus prophylaxis
ACTION
Administer Td/Tdap if vaccination status is not up to date
DETAILS
Standard protocol for open wound management
10. Wound care
ACTION
Silver sulfadiazine 1% cream or modern silver-containing dressings
DETAILS
Debride devitalized tissue; unroof blisters (especially in HF burns to remove trapped fluoride ions)
STEP | ACTION | DETAILS |
|---|---|---|
1. Scene safety and PPE | Protect rescuers from chemical contamination | Gloves, goggles, gown; remove patient from source |
2. Remove contaminated clothing | Strip all clothing and jewelry in contact with the agent | Do not pull clothing over the head if face is involved; cut it off |
3. Copious water irrigation | Begin within 10 minutes ideally; use low-pressure tap water | Acids: minimum 15 to 30 minutes. Alkalis: minimum 60 minutes. Continue until wound pH is 7.0 |
4. Do NOT neutralize | Never apply an acid to neutralize an alkali or vice versa | Neutralization reactions are exothermic and cause additional thermal injury |
5. Brush dry chemicals first | Powdered agents (e.g., dry lime) should be mechanically removed before irrigation | Water activates some dry chemicals and worsens the burn |
6. Airway assessment | Evaluate for stridor, hoarseness, facial burns, soot | Consider early intubation if inhalational exposure is suspected |
7. Fluid resuscitation | Use the Parkland formula for burns involving more than 20% TBSA | . Give 50% in the first 8 hours, 50% over the next 16 hours. Use lactated Ringer's solution. Titrate to urine output of 0.5 to 1 mL/kg/hr in adults (1 to 2 mL/kg/hr in children) |
8. Pain management | IV opioids (morphine 0.1 mg/kg IV titrated) | Avoid analgesics in HF burns until the pain endpoint can be used to assess treatment response |
9. Tetanus prophylaxis | Administer Td/Tdap if vaccination status is not up to date | Standard protocol for open wound management |
10. Wound care | Silver sulfadiazine 1% cream or modern silver-containing dressings | Debride devitalized tissue; unroof blisters (especially in HF burns to remove trapped fluoride ions) |
Agent-Targeted Therapy
Hydrofluoric Acid Burns:
The treatment of HF burns is unique and frequently tested. Standard water irrigation alone is insufficient because the fluoride ion has already penetrated into deeper tissues. After initial decontamination with water for at least 30 minutes, apply 2.5% calcium gluconate gel to the affected area and massage continuously. The calcium gluconate reacts with the fluoride ion to form insoluble, non-toxic calcium fluoride, neutralizing the ongoing toxicity. The endpoint of treatment is complete relief of pain, which is why analgesics should be avoided early on. If topical gel fails to relieve pain, subcutaneous or intradermal injection of 5% calcium gluconate (0.5 mL per cm of burn area, using a 27 or 30-gauge needle) may be required. For digital burns or large area burns unresponsive to topical or local injection therapy, intra-arterial calcium gluconate infusion (10 mL of 10% calcium gluconate diluted in 40 mL of D5W, infused over 4 hours through the radial or brachial artery) can be performed. For inhalational HF exposure, administer nebulized 2.5 to 5% calcium gluconate (4 mL). Monitor serum calcium, magnesium, and potassium; replete as needed. Obtain serial ECGs. Avoid succinylcholine if intubation is required, as hyperkalemia from fluoride toxicity can be worsened.
Alkali Burns (General):
Alkali burns require the most prolonged irrigation. Continue until wound pH reaches 7.0 and remains stable for at least 15 minutes after stopping irrigation. Cement (calcium hydroxide) burns are a common trap: the insidious onset means the patient often presents late with already-deep burns. After decontamination, wound care follows standard burn protocols.
Ocular Chemical Burns:
Irrigation is the cornerstone. Begin immediately, even before a formal eye examination. Use normal saline or lactated Ringer's via a Morgan lens or IV tubing placed in the fornix. Irrigate until the pH of the tears (checked in the inferior fornix) is 7.0 to 7.4. After irrigation, the medical treatment includes: topical antibiotics (e.g., erythromycin ointment or fluoroquinolone drops), cycloplegics (e.g., cyclopentolate 1% or atropine 1% to reduce ciliary spasm and pain), topical corticosteroids (prednisolone acetate 1%, used in the first 7 to 10 days only; avoid after 10 to 14 days as they impair collagen synthesis and increase the risk of corneal perforation), preservative-free artificial tears, and ascorbic acid (vitamin C, 2 g orally daily and 10% topically every 2 hours) to promote collagen synthesis. For Roper-Hall Grade III and IV injuries, amniotic membrane transplantation and limbal stem cell transplantation may be required.
Referral Criteria (Per KMK No. HK.01.07/MENKES/555/2019)According to KMK No. HK.01.07/MENKES/555/2019 (Pedoman Nasional Pelayanan Kedokteran Tata Laksana Luka Bakar), the Indonesian national guideline adopts referral criteria aligned with the ANZBA (Australian and New Zealand Burn Association) framework. Chemical burns are explicitly listed as one of the criteria mandating referral to a burn center (pusat perawatan luka bakar), regardless of TBSA percentage. Additional referral criteria include burns involving the face, hands, feet, genitalia, perineum, or major joints; electrical burns; burns with concomitant inhalation injury; circumferential burns; burns in patients with preexisting comorbidities; and burns in extremes of age. The guideline also mandates that before transfer, the referring facility must complete initial stabilization including airway management, fluid resuscitation using the Parkland formula, and adequate pain control. RSUP Cipto Mangunkusumo (RSCM) Jakarta serves as the primary national burn referral center.
For fluid resuscitation, the PNPK follows the Parkland formula:
Deliver 50% of the calculated volume in the first 8 hours from the time of injury (not from time of presentation), and the remaining 50% over the next 16 hours. Use lactated Ringer's solution. Titrate to urine output: 0.5 to 1 mL/kg/hr in adults, 1 to 2 mL/kg/hr in children. If pigmented urine is present (suggesting myoglobinuria), increase the target urine output to 70 to 100 mL/hr in adults and 2 mL/kg/hr in children.
Indonesian Occupational Safety Regulations for Chemical Hazards
Several overlapping regulations govern the workplace prevention and first-aid response to chemical injuries:
REGULATION | SCOPE |
|---|---|
UU No. 1/1970 (Keselamatan Kerja) | Foundation law mandating workplace safety systems, including in laboratories and chemical plants |
Kepmenaker No. 187/1999 (Pengendalian Bahan Kimia Berbahaya) | Requires companies using hazardous chemicals to employ a Petugas K3 Kimia (Chemical Safety Officer) and maintain Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS/LDKB) |
Permenkes No. 70/2016 (Standar dan Persyaratan Kesehatan Lingkungan Kerja Industri) | Sets threshold limit values (Nilai Ambang Batas/NAB) for chemical and physical agents in the workplace |
Permenaker No. 5/2018 (K3 Lingkungan Kerja) | Regulates occupational exposure limits, mandates hazard identification, and requires provision of PPE |
PP No. 74/2001 (Pengelolaan B3) | Governs management of hazardous and toxic materials, including emergency response for chemical spills and accidents; mandates annual health screening for workers handling B3 |
Permenkes No. 52/2018 (K3 di Fasilitas Pelayanan Kesehatan) | Guidelines for handling chemical substances in healthcare laboratories, including the requirement for eye-wash stations (eye washer) and body-wash stations (body washer) |
05Special Agents and Considerations
Hydrofluoric Acid (HF)
HF is the single most important "exception" chemical for exam purposes. Unlike other acids, HF produces liquefactive necrosis and causes deep tissue injury that appears mild externally. The fluoride ion penetrates cells, chelates intracellular calcium and magnesium, and disrupts enzymatic function. Systemic absorption leads to hypocalcemia, hypomagnesemia, and hyperkalemia, which can trigger fatal ventricular fibrillation. Any burn involving concentrated HF (above 50%) or covering an area larger than 25 square inches requires immediate cardiac monitoring and serial electrolyte checks. The antidote is calcium gluconate, applied topically as a 2.5% gel, injected locally as 5% solution, or given intra-arterially for refractory cases. The endpoint of treatment is pain relief, not visual wound improvement. Avoid analgesics in the early phase to preserve this clinical endpoint.
White Phosphorus Burns
White phosphorus ignites spontaneously on contact with air. The particles continue to burn as long as they are exposed to oxygen. Management requires continuous submersion of the wound in water or saline to prevent re-ignition. Particles should be identified using a Wood lamp (they fluoresce) or by darkening the room (they glow). Remove particles with forceps. After removal, apply a 1% copper sulfate solution, which reacts with phosphorus to form a dark, easily identifiable copper phosphide coating, facilitating complete removal. Avoid using copper sulfate on large areas due to the risk of copper toxicity (hemolysis, hepatorenal failure).
Phenol (Carbolic Acid) Burns
Phenol causes both coagulative necrosis and systemic toxicity (CNS depression, hepatotoxicity, cardiac arrhythmias). The wound initially appears painless and white, then progresses to brown or black gangrene. Phenol is lipophilic and poorly soluble in water, so water irrigation alone is less effective. The preferred decontamination method is wiping the affected area with polyethylene glycol (PEG 300 or 400) or, if unavailable, isopropyl alcohol to dissolve the phenol, followed by water irrigation.
Elemental Alkali Metal Burns (Sodium, Potassium, Lithium, Magnesium)
These metals react violently and exothermically with water, producing thermal burns on top of chemical injury. Do NOT irrigate with water. Instead, cover the area with mineral oil, remove metal fragments with dry forceps, and then proceed with standard wound care.
Cement (Calcium Hydroxide) Burns
Cement is a common cause of alkali burns in construction workers. The injury is insidious because cement is not perceived as a caustic agent, and workers often remain in contact with wet cement for hours before symptoms develop. By the time the patient presents, the burn is frequently deep dermal or full-thickness. The lower extremities are most commonly involved. After removal of all cement-contaminated clothing and footwear, irrigate the area extensively and treat as a standard alkali burn.
06Differential Diagnosis and Distractors
Thermal burn
WHY IT IS SIMILAR
Blistering, erythema, tissue necrosis; similar wound appearance
KEY DISCRIMINATOR
History of flame/scald exposure, no chemical residue, wound pH is neutral, no progressive deepening after removal from source
Electrical burn
WHY IT IS SIMILAR
Deep tissue injury disproportionate to surface wound; can cause arrhythmias and rhabdomyolysis
KEY DISCRIMINATOR
Entry and exit wounds present; history of electrical contact; cardiac arrhythmias from direct current effect rather than electrolyte derangement
Contact dermatitis (irritant or allergic)
WHY IT IS SIMILAR
Erythema, vesicles, skin irritation at the contact site
KEY DISCRIMINATOR
Pruritus is dominant rather than pain; no tissue necrosis; rash follows distribution of allergen/irritant contact; resolves with removal and corticosteroids
Stevens-Johnson Syndrome / Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis
WHY IT IS SIMILAR
Widespread skin blistering and sloughing mimicking a burn
KEY DISCRIMINATOR
History of drug exposure (antibiotics, anticonvulsants, allopurinol); mucosal involvement (oral, conjunctival, genital); positive Nikolsky sign; skin biopsy shows full-thickness epidermal necrosis
Necrotizing fasciitis
WHY IT IS SIMILAR
Rapidly progressive skin necrosis with pain out of proportion to exam
KEY DISCRIMINATOR
Fever, systemic toxicity, crepitus on palpation, rapid spread along fascial planes; no history of chemical exposure; surgical exploration reveals fascial necrosis and dishwater-gray tissue
Frostbite (severe)
WHY IT IS SIMILAR
Blistering, eschar formation, tissue loss in a distal distribution
KEY DISCRIMINATOR
History of cold exposure; hemorrhagic blisters (as opposed to serous); distribution follows extremity exposure pattern (fingers, toes, ears, nose)
Staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome (SSSS)
WHY IT IS SIMILAR
Widespread superficial blistering and skin peeling mimicking a burn
KEY DISCRIMINATOR
Occurs in neonates and young children; positive Nikolsky sign; no history of chemical contact; caused by exfoliative toxin of S. aureus; responds to antistaphylococcal antibiotics
Radiation burn
WHY IT IS SIMILAR
Erythema, desquamation, ulceration
KEY DISCRIMINATOR
History of radiation exposure (therapeutic or accidental); delayed onset (days to weeks); follows radiation field distribution
DIFFERENTIAL | WHY IT IS SIMILAR | KEY DISCRIMINATOR |
|---|---|---|
Thermal burn | Blistering, erythema, tissue necrosis; similar wound appearance | History of flame/scald exposure, no chemical residue, wound pH is neutral, no progressive deepening after removal from source |
Electrical burn | Deep tissue injury disproportionate to surface wound; can cause arrhythmias and rhabdomyolysis | Entry and exit wounds present; history of electrical contact; cardiac arrhythmias from direct current effect rather than electrolyte derangement |
Contact dermatitis (irritant or allergic) | Erythema, vesicles, skin irritation at the contact site | Pruritus is dominant rather than pain; no tissue necrosis; rash follows distribution of allergen/irritant contact; resolves with removal and corticosteroids |
Stevens-Johnson Syndrome / Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis | Widespread skin blistering and sloughing mimicking a burn | History of drug exposure (antibiotics, anticonvulsants, allopurinol); mucosal involvement (oral, conjunctival, genital); positive Nikolsky sign; skin biopsy shows full-thickness epidermal necrosis |
Necrotizing fasciitis | Rapidly progressive skin necrosis with pain out of proportion to exam | Fever, systemic toxicity, crepitus on palpation, rapid spread along fascial planes; no history of chemical exposure; surgical exploration reveals fascial necrosis and dishwater-gray tissue |
Frostbite (severe) | Blistering, eschar formation, tissue loss in a distal distribution | History of cold exposure; hemorrhagic blisters (as opposed to serous); distribution follows extremity exposure pattern (fingers, toes, ears, nose) |
Staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome (SSSS) | Widespread superficial blistering and skin peeling mimicking a burn | Occurs in neonates and young children; positive Nikolsky sign; no history of chemical contact; caused by exfoliative toxin of S. aureus; responds to antistaphylococcal antibiotics |
Radiation burn | Erythema, desquamation, ulceration | History of radiation exposure (therapeutic or accidental); delayed onset (days to weeks); follows radiation field distribution |
07Traps and High-Yield Pearls
The most common way students lose points on chemical burn questions falls into three categories.
First, the reflexive neutralization error. When presented with an acid burn, many students instinctively choose "apply a base to neutralize the acid" as the first step. This is wrong and dangerous. Neutralization reactions are exothermic and produce a secondary thermal injury on top of the existing chemical injury. The correct first step is always copious irrigation with plain water. The only exception to water irrigation is burns from elemental alkali metals (sodium, potassium, lithium, magnesium), where water causes an exothermic reaction and mineral oil coverage is required instead.
Second, the HF acid trap. Test-writers love hydrofluoric acid because it breaks the rules. It is an acid that produces liquefactive necrosis (not coagulative). It causes systemic toxicity (hypocalcemia, hyperkalemia, cardiac arrest) through a mechanism unique among acid burns. And it has a treatment that differs from all other chemical burns (calcium gluconate rather than irrigation alone). When a vignette describes a chemical burn with "pain out of proportion to the visible wound" in a glass etcher, electronics worker, or semiconductor plant employee, think HF immediately. The next best step after irrigation is topical calcium gluconate, not silver sulfadiazine. If the question asks about monitoring, the answer is serial calcium, magnesium, potassium, and ECG, not wound culture.
Third, the delayed presentation of alkali burns. Cement burns are the classic exam scenario. A construction worker presents hours after exposure with what appears to be a superficial wound. The trap is underestimating the depth of injury. The test is asking whether you understand that alkali burns (liquefactive necrosis) continue to penetrate tissue and that the wound will evolve to become much deeper over 48 to 72 hours. The correct answer involves prolonged irrigation (at least 60 minutes for alkali), close follow-up with re-evaluation of burn depth, and referral to a burn center.
The core competency being tested across all chemical burn questions is prioritization: can you recognize that decontamination comes before diagnostics, that water irrigation is the universal first step (with narrow exceptions), and that certain agents (HF, alkali metals, phosphorus, phenol) require agent-targeted therapies on top of standard burn care?