Trauma Kimia Mata
Published on September 5, 2026
Risk Factors
Industrial workers (cleaning agents, cement, fertilizers), laboratory personnel, assault victims, household accidents (drain cleaners, bleach, ammonia), battery explosion (sulfuric acid)
Etiology
Direct ocular surface contact with an alkaline substance (most common and most severe) or acidic substance; alkali causes liquefactive necrosis with deep penetration, acid causes coagulative necrosis with self-limiting penetration
Presentation
Acute onset of severe eye pain, tearing (epiphora), blepharospasm, blurred vision immediately following chemical exposure
Classic Exam
Conjunctival injection and chemosis, corneal epithelial defects or opacification, limbal blanching/ischemia (white, avascular limbus = severe injury), perilimbal blanching in a "porcelain white" appearance in Grade IV injuries; paradoxically, the most severe burns may appear deceptively "quiet" because of total vascular destruction
Diagnostics
Litmus paper pH testing of the conjunctival fornix (normal = 7.0 to 7.3); slit lamp examination showing corneal clarity or haze, fluorescein uptake for epithelial defects, assessment of limbal ischemia in clock hours; elevated intraocular pressure (IOP)
Management
Immediate copious irrigation with any available isotonic fluid BEFORE any other intervention; continue until pH normalizes (7.0 to 7.3); subsequent treatment includes topical antibiotics, cycloplegics, topical ascorbic acid, topical steroids (with time-limited use), and surgical referral for Grade III to IV injuries
Keywords
"Splash of cleaning fluid," "cement in the eye," "white/blanched limbus," "copious irrigation," "check pH," "porcelain white eye," "limbal ischemia," "alkali is worse than acid"
01Pathophysiology
Chemical ocular burns involve direct destruction of the ocular surface, and their severity depends entirely on the type of chemical (alkali vs. acid), concentration, duration of contact, and area of exposure.
Alkali burns are the most dangerous because alkali agents are lipophilic. They dissolve and saponify cell membrane lipids, allowing the chemical to rapidly penetrate through the corneal epithelium, stroma, and even into the anterior chamber. This process is termed liquefactive necrosis, where tissue is progressively dissolved rather than sealed off. The alkali ion continues to penetrate deeper as long as contact persists. Common alkali agents include ammonia (), sodium hydroxide (lye/NaOH), calcium hydroxide (lime/cement), and potassium hydroxide (KOH). Because of this deep penetration, alkali burns can damage the lens (causing cataract), ciliary body, and trabecular meshwork (causing secondary glaucoma).
Acid burns, in contrast, cause coagulative necrosis. The acid denatures and precipitates surface proteins, forming a coagulum barrier that impedes further penetration. This is why acid injuries tend to be self-limiting and less destructive to deeper structures. The exception is hydrofluoric acid (HF), which behaves like an alkali because the fluoride ion penetrates deeply into tissues.
The critical structure that determines prognosis is the limbus, the zone between the cornea and sclera that houses the limbal stem cells. These stem cells are responsible for corneal epithelial regeneration. When limbal stem cells are destroyed by chemical injury, the cornea cannot re-epithelialize, and conjunctival tissue grows over the corneal surface instead (a process called conjunctivalization or limbal stem cell deficiency). The degree of limbal ischemia, visible as a white, avascular ring around the cornea, is the single most important prognostic indicator.
Inflammatory mediators released from damaged tissue recruit polymorphonuclear cells (PMNs), which release collagenases and other proteases. These enzymes can cause corneal melting (keratolysis), typically peaking between days 7 and 21 after injury, a phenomenon sometimes called the "sterile ulceration" phase. This is why steroid use after day 10 to 14 is controversial, as steroids inhibit collagen synthesis and may worsen corneal thinning during this vulnerable window.
02Classification and Clinical Manifestation
The Roper-Hall classification (modified Hughes classification) is the most commonly tested grading system. It guides both prognosis and management.
Roper-Hall Classification
I
Corneal Findings
Corneal epithelial damage only, cornea is clear
Limbal Ischemia
No limbal ischemia (0 clock hours)
Prognosis
Excellent; full recovery expected
II
Corneal Findings
Corneal haze present but iris details still visible
Limbal Ischemia
Less than one-third of limbus involved (less than 4 clock hours)
Prognosis
Good prognosis
III
Corneal Findings
Total corneal epithelial loss; stromal haze obscures iris details
Limbal Ischemia
One-third to one-half of limbus involved (4 to 6 clock hours)
Prognosis
Guarded; significant risk of permanent visual impairment
IV
Corneal Findings
Cornea is opaque (porcelain white); no view of iris or pupil
Limbal Ischemia
More than one-half of limbus involved (more than 6 clock hours)
Prognosis
Poor; high risk of corneal perforation, stem cell failure, and permanent blindness
Grade | Corneal Findings | Limbal Ischemia | Prognosis |
|---|---|---|---|
I | Corneal epithelial damage only, cornea is clear | No limbal ischemia (0 clock hours) | Excellent; full recovery expected |
II | Corneal haze present but iris details still visible | Less than one-third of limbus involved (less than 4 clock hours) | Good prognosis |
III | Total corneal epithelial loss; stromal haze obscures iris details | One-third to one-half of limbus involved (4 to 6 clock hours) | Guarded; significant risk of permanent visual impairment |
IV | Cornea is opaque (porcelain white); no view of iris or pupil | More than one-half of limbus involved (more than 6 clock hours) | Poor; high risk of corneal perforation, stem cell failure, and permanent blindness |
Dua Classification
I
Limbal Involvement (Clock Hours)
0
Conjunctival Involvement (%)
0%
Prognosis
Very good
II
Limbal Involvement (Clock Hours)
Less than or equal to 3
Conjunctival Involvement (%)
Less than or equal to 30%
Prognosis
Good
III
Limbal Involvement (Clock Hours)
Between 3 and 6
Conjunctival Involvement (%)
30% to 50%
Prognosis
Good to guarded
IV
Limbal Involvement (Clock Hours)
Between 6 and 9
Conjunctival Involvement (%)
50% to 75%
Prognosis
Guarded to poor
V
Limbal Involvement (Clock Hours)
Between 9 and 12
Conjunctival Involvement (%)
75% to less than 100%
Prognosis
Poor
VI
Limbal Involvement (Clock Hours)
Total limbus involved (12 clock hours)
Conjunctival Involvement (%)
100%
Prognosis
Very poor
Grade | Limbal Involvement (Clock Hours) | Conjunctival Involvement (%) | Prognosis |
|---|---|---|---|
I | 0 | 0% | Very good |
II | Less than or equal to 3 | Less than or equal to 30% | Good |
III | Between 3 and 6 | 30% to 50% | Good to guarded |
IV | Between 6 and 9 | 50% to 75% | Guarded to poor |
V | Between 9 and 12 | 75% to less than 100% | Poor |
VI | Total limbus involved (12 clock hours) | 100% | Very poor |
The Dua classification separates the most severe injuries into three categories (IV, V, VI) instead of grouping them all as "Grade IV," which allows for more precise prognostication. For exam purposes, Roper-Hall is more commonly referenced.
A key clinical pearl: in very severe (Grade IV) burns, the eye may appear paradoxically white and quiet because the conjunctival and episcleral blood vessels are completely destroyed. This "porcelain white eye" appearance can mislead an inexperienced examiner into underestimating the severity.
03Diagnostic Workup
pH testing (litmus paper)
Role
Best initial and most important test
Key Finding
Must be repeated after irrigation until pH is 7.0 to 7.3
Slit lamp examination
Role
Assess corneal clarity, epithelial defects, limbal status
Key Finding
Grading by Roper-Hall; fluorescein staining shows epithelial loss
Fluorescein staining
Role
Evaluate corneal epithelial integrity
Key Finding
Uptake indicates epithelial defect; large confluent staining suggests severe burns
Intraocular pressure (IOP)
Role
Assess for secondary glaucoma
Key Finding
Elevated IOP may occur from trabecular meshwork damage or inflammation
Eversion of eyelids
Role
Check for retained chemical particles
Key Finding
Particularly important in calcium hydroxide (cement/plaster) injuries where solid particles may lodge in the fornices
Test | Role | Key Finding |
|---|---|---|
pH testing (litmus paper) | Best initial and most important test | Must be repeated after irrigation until pH is 7.0 to 7.3 |
Slit lamp examination | Assess corneal clarity, epithelial defects, limbal status | Grading by Roper-Hall; fluorescein staining shows epithelial loss |
Fluorescein staining | Evaluate corneal epithelial integrity | Uptake indicates epithelial defect; large confluent staining suggests severe burns |
Intraocular pressure (IOP) | Assess for secondary glaucoma | Elevated IOP may occur from trabecular meshwork damage or inflammation |
Eversion of eyelids | Check for retained chemical particles | Particularly important in calcium hydroxide (cement/plaster) injuries where solid particles may lodge in the fornices |
The single most important diagnostic and therapeutic action is immediate pH testing of the ocular surface. However, this does not mean you should delay irrigation to check pH. The correct sequence, which is heavily tested, is:
Begin copious irrigation IMMEDIATELY at the scene or upon arrival, before any other assessment including visual acuity.
After a minimum of 15 to 30 minutes of continuous irrigation (using at least 1 to 2 liters of fluid), recheck pH.
If pH has not returned to the range of 7.0 to 7.3, continue irrigation and recheck every 5 to 10 minutes.
Only after pH has normalized do you proceed to a formal slit lamp examination and clinical grading.
Irrigation should be performed with isotonic saline or lactated Ringer's solution if available. If neither is available, any clean water source is acceptable. The key principle is that no time should be wasted looking for the perfect irrigation fluid. A Morgan lens (a scleral contact lens connected to IV tubing) can facilitate continuous, hands-free irrigation.
During eyelid eversion, look for and remove any retained particulate matter, especially in burns from cement, plaster, or calcium hydroxide. Retained solid particles act as a continuous reservoir of alkali and will continue to damage tissue even during irrigation.
04Management and Treatment
Immediate (field/ED)
Intervention
Copious irrigation
Details
Start BEFORE anything else; use saline, LR, or clean water; irrigate for at least 30 minutes; goal pH 7.0 to 7.3
Immediate (field/ED)
Intervention
Remove particulate matter
Details
Evert lids, sweep fornices with moistened cotton swab
Acute (post-irrigation)
Intervention
Topical antibiotics
Details
Erythromycin ointment or fluoroquinolone drops (e.g., moxifloxacin 0.5%) four times daily to prevent secondary infection
Acute
Intervention
Cycloplegic agent
Details
Cyclopentolate 1% or atropine 1% two to three times daily for pain relief (reduces ciliary spasm) and prevents posterior synechiae
Acute
Intervention
Topical ascorbic acid (Vitamin C)
Details
10% ascorbic acid drops, every 1 to 2 hours; promotes collagen synthesis and counters the collagenase activity that causes corneal melting
Acute
Intervention
Oral ascorbic acid
Details
2 grams orally four times daily (total 8 g/day) as adjunct to topical ascorbate
Acute
Intervention
Topical citric acid (sodium citrate 10%)**
Details
Every 2 hours; chelates calcium and inhibits PMN-derived collagenase
Acute
Intervention
Topical corticosteroids
Details
Prednisolone acetate 1%, every 1 to 2 hours for the first 7 to 10 days ONLY; helps reduce acute inflammation
Acute
Intervention
IOP-lowering agents
Details
Topical timolol 0.5% or oral acetazolamide if intraocular pressure is elevated
Chronic/Surgical
Intervention
Amniotic membrane transplant
Details
For persistent epithelial defects in Grade III to IV injuries
Chronic/Surgical
Intervention
Limbal stem cell transplant
Details
For limbal stem cell deficiency with conjunctivalization
Chronic/Surgical
Intervention
Penetrating keratoplasty (corneal transplant)
Details
For end-stage corneal opacification after the ocular surface has been stabilized
Phase | Intervention | Details |
|---|---|---|
Immediate (field/ED) | Copious irrigation | Start BEFORE anything else; use saline, LR, or clean water; irrigate for at least 30 minutes; goal pH 7.0 to 7.3 |
Immediate (field/ED) | Remove particulate matter | Evert lids, sweep fornices with moistened cotton swab |
Acute (post-irrigation) | Topical antibiotics | Erythromycin ointment or fluoroquinolone drops (e.g., moxifloxacin 0.5%) four times daily to prevent secondary infection |
Acute | Cycloplegic agent | Cyclopentolate 1% or atropine 1% two to three times daily for pain relief (reduces ciliary spasm) and prevents posterior synechiae |
Acute | Topical ascorbic acid (Vitamin C) | 10% ascorbic acid drops, every 1 to 2 hours; promotes collagen synthesis and counters the collagenase activity that causes corneal melting |
Acute | Oral ascorbic acid | 2 grams orally four times daily (total 8 g/day) as adjunct to topical ascorbate |
Acute | Topical citric acid (sodium citrate 10%)** | Every 2 hours; chelates calcium and inhibits PMN-derived collagenase |
Acute | Topical corticosteroids | Prednisolone acetate 1%, every 1 to 2 hours for the first 7 to 10 days ONLY; helps reduce acute inflammation |
Acute | IOP-lowering agents | Topical timolol 0.5% or oral acetazolamide if intraocular pressure is elevated |
Chronic/Surgical | Amniotic membrane transplant | For persistent epithelial defects in Grade III to IV injuries |
Chronic/Surgical | Limbal stem cell transplant | For limbal stem cell deficiency with conjunctivalization |
Chronic/Surgical | Penetrating keratoplasty (corneal transplant) | For end-stage corneal opacification after the ocular surface has been stabilized |
Irrigation is the cornerstone and must begin within seconds of exposure. Every minute of delay increases the depth and severity of injury. The exam will test whether you recognize that irrigation takes priority over visual acuity, slit lamp exam, or even history taking. A vignette might describe a chemical splash and then ask "What is the next best step?" The answer is always irrigation, regardless of what other information is offered or requested.
Topical steroids are used aggressively during the first 7 to 10 days to suppress the neutrophilic inflammatory response. However, after day 10 to 14, steroids should be tapered and discontinued because they inhibit fibroblast collagen synthesis. The period from day 7 to 21 is when collagenase-mediated corneal melting is at its peak. Using steroids during this window accelerates stromal thinning and raises the risk of corneal perforation. This "steroid controversy" is a high-yield exam topic.
Ascorbic acid (both topical and oral) is a cofactor for collagen synthesis and helps restore the depleted ascorbate levels in the aqueous humor following alkali injury. It directly counteracts the collagenase-mediated destruction and promotes stromal repair.
Citric acid (sodium citrate 10%) works by chelating calcium ions, which are required by PMN-derived collagenases (matrix metalloproteinases) to function. By removing calcium, citrate effectively inhibits the enzymes responsible for corneal melting.
For Grade III and IV injuries, early referral to an ophthalmologist or corneal specialist is essential. These patients may require amniotic membrane transplantation to provide a biological scaffold for epithelial healing, followed later by limbal stem cell transplantation and eventually corneal transplantation if corneal opacity persists.
Contraindications and cautions:
Do NOT use steroid drops beyond 10 to 14 days without ophthalmology guidance due to the risk of corneal melting and perforation.
Do NOT patch the eye, as this retains heat and prevents monitoring.
Do NOT attempt to neutralize the chemical with another chemical (e.g., using acid to neutralize alkali). The exothermic reaction will cause additional thermal injury.
05Differential Diagnosis and Distractors
Thermal burn of the eye
Why It Is Similar
Both present with acute eye pain, tearing, and corneal damage after an exposure event
Key Discriminator
Thermal burns typically cause lid burns and singed lashes; no pH abnormality on litmus testing; history involves heat/flame rather than chemical splash
Ultraviolet keratitis (welder's flash / snow blindness)
Why It Is Similar
Acute bilateral eye pain, tearing, photophobia, and foreign body sensation
Key Discriminator
Onset is delayed 6 to 12 hours after UV exposure; punctate epithelial erosions on slit lamp; history of welding or tanning bed without eye protection; pH is normal
Acute angle-closure glaucoma
Why It Is Similar
Severe eye pain, blurred vision, and red eye
Key Discriminator
Presents with mid-dilated, fixed pupil, halos around lights, nausea/vomiting; no history of chemical exposure; corneal edema is from elevated IOP rather than chemical destruction
Bacterial keratitis (corneal ulcer)
Why It Is Similar
Painful red eye with corneal opacity and epithelial defect
Key Discriminator
Usually has a preceding history of contact lens wear or corneal abrasion; slit lamp shows a focal infiltrate with surrounding stromal haze; no chemical exposure history
Anterior uveitis (iritis)
Why It Is Similar
Eye pain, photophobia, and tearing
Key Discriminator
Shows cells and flare in the anterior chamber on slit lamp; ciliary flush pattern; consensual photophobia (pain when light is shone in the opposite eye); no chemical exposure
Allergic conjunctivitis
Why It Is Similar
Chemosis (conjunctival swelling), tearing, redness
Key Discriminator
Dominated by itching as the primary symptom; bilateral; papillae on tarsal conjunctiva; no corneal opacification or limbal ischemia
Differential | Why It Is Similar | Key Discriminator |
|---|---|---|
Thermal burn of the eye | Both present with acute eye pain, tearing, and corneal damage after an exposure event | Thermal burns typically cause lid burns and singed lashes; no pH abnormality on litmus testing; history involves heat/flame rather than chemical splash |
Ultraviolet keratitis (welder's flash / snow blindness) | Acute bilateral eye pain, tearing, photophobia, and foreign body sensation | Onset is delayed 6 to 12 hours after UV exposure; punctate epithelial erosions on slit lamp; history of welding or tanning bed without eye protection; pH is normal |
Acute angle-closure glaucoma | Severe eye pain, blurred vision, and red eye | Presents with mid-dilated, fixed pupil, halos around lights, nausea/vomiting; no history of chemical exposure; corneal edema is from elevated IOP rather than chemical destruction |
Bacterial keratitis (corneal ulcer) | Painful red eye with corneal opacity and epithelial defect | Usually has a preceding history of contact lens wear or corneal abrasion; slit lamp shows a focal infiltrate with surrounding stromal haze; no chemical exposure history |
Anterior uveitis (iritis) | Eye pain, photophobia, and tearing | Shows cells and flare in the anterior chamber on slit lamp; ciliary flush pattern; consensual photophobia (pain when light is shone in the opposite eye); no chemical exposure |
Allergic conjunctivitis | Chemosis (conjunctival swelling), tearing, redness | Dominated by itching as the primary symptom; bilateral; papillae on tarsal conjunctiva; no corneal opacification or limbal ischemia |
06Traps and High-Yield Pearls
The most common way students get questions about chemical eye injuries wrong is by delaying irrigation to perform another step first. The exam will tempt you with answer choices like "check visual acuity," "perform a slit lamp examination," "obtain a detailed history of the chemical involved," or "instill topical anesthetic before irrigation." While topical anesthetic may help the patient tolerate irrigation, the correct answer to "What is the FIRST step?" is always begin copious irrigation immediately. Nothing takes priority over irrigation, not even identifying the chemical agent.
The second major trap involves the porcelain white eye. A vignette describing a completely white, painless eye after chemical exposure is testing whether you recognize a Grade IV injury. Students frequently misidentify this as a "mild" injury because the eye appears calm and non-injected. The absence of redness is not reassuring; it reflects total vascular obliteration and carries the worst prognosis.
The third trap is the steroid timing question. A vignette may describe a patient on day 14 after a chemical burn who is developing progressive corneal thinning, and ask you to identify the cause or next step. The answer hinges on recognizing that continued steroid use beyond 10 to 14 days contributes to corneal melting, and steroids should be tapered.
Finally, remember that alkali is always worse than acid (except hydrofluoric acid). If a vignette gives you a choice between two patients with similar exposure durations but one had an alkali exposure and the other acid, the alkali patient will have the more severe injury. The underlying concept being tested is the difference between liquefactive necrosis (penetrating, progressive) and coagulative necrosis (self-limiting, barrier-forming).