Rekam Medis
Published on September 24, 2026
Category | Details |
|---|---|
Legal Basis | Permenkes No. 24/2022 (replaced Permenkes 269/2008); PP No. 28/2024 (Pasal 777-786); UU Praktik Kedokteran No. 29/2004 (Pasal 46-47); UU Kesehatan No. 17/2023 |
Definition | A document containing patient identity data, examination findings, treatment, procedures, and all other services provided to the patient |
Who Must Complete It | Every physician, dentist, and healthcare professional who provides individual healthcare services |
Who Must Maintain It | Every healthcare facility (hospitals, puskesmas, clinics, independent practices, laboratories) |
Ownership Principle | The document belongs to the healthcare facility; the content belongs to the patient |
Format | Electronic Medical Record (RME) is now mandatory; non-electronic is permitted only when technical barriers exist |
Retention | Conventional: 5 years (inpatient), 2 years (non-hospital); Discharge summary & informed consent: 10 years; Electronic: minimum 25 years from last visit |
Confidentiality | Must be maintained even after the patient has died |
Keywords | "Document belongs to facility, content belongs to patient," "25 years electronic retention," "SATUSEHAT integration," "written request for disclosure," "court order exception" |
01Definition and Legal Foundation
A medical record is a legal document that records the entire journey of healthcare services rendered to a patient. Under Permenkes No. 24/2022, it is defined as a document containing patient identity data, examination findings, diagnoses, treatments, procedures, and all other services provided. This document must be prepared in a complete and accurate manner.
The legal framework governing medical records in Indonesia rests on several pillars. Permenkes No. 24/2022 was enacted on August 31, 2022, and it revoked the older Permenkes 269/MENKES/PER/III/2008 about Medical Records. This newer regulation shifts the paradigm toward digitalization. The regulation does not only apply to large hospitals; it explicitly requires ALL healthcare facilities to implement Electronic Medical Records (RME), including hospitals (public and private), puskesmas, clinics (pratama and utama), independent physician practices, and laboratories.
Further reinforcing this obligation, PP No. 28/2024 states that every healthcare facility is required to maintain medical records (Pasal 777), and every physician and healthcare professional providing individual healthcare must create them. Medical records must be kept electronically in accordance with prevailing regulations. If a facility cannot maintain electronic records due to technical obstacles, non-electronic records may be used until those obstacles are resolved (Pasal 779).
The exam loves to test the mandatory nature of medical record creation. No physician is exempt. A solo practitioner in a remote area still must maintain medical records.
02Types and Minimum Content of Medical Records
Medical records are categorized by the type of service setting. Each has slightly different minimum content requirements. This is a frequently tested distinction.
Content Requirements by Service Type
Type | Minimum Content |
|---|---|
Outpatient (Rawat Jalan) | Patient identity; date and time of visit; history (anamnesis); physical exam and supporting test results; diagnosis; treatment plan; healthcare provider's name and signature |
Inpatient (Rawat Inap) | All outpatient elements PLUS: informed consent; nursing notes; dietary records; discharge summary (containing admission condition, final diagnosis, procedures performed, discharge condition, follow-up instructions, medications taken home) |
Emergency (Gawat Darurat) | All outpatient elements PLUS: patient's condition on arrival; identity of the person who brought the patient in; transportation method for transfer to another facility; summary of patient's condition before leaving the emergency unit |
Disaster Setting | Same as emergency, with additional data relevant to the disaster event |
Under Permenkes 24/2022, the minimum content of medical records consists of: (a) patient identity; (b) physical examination and supporting test results; (c) diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up plan.
For Electronic Medical Records (RME), the content is divided into administrative documentation (at minimum containing registration documentation) and clinical documentation (containing all healthcare service documentation).
Patient Registration Data is a critical concept. Patient identity data must at minimum include the medical record number, the patient's name, and the national identification number (NIK). Social data must at minimum include religion, occupation, education, and marital status.
The exam may ask: "What is the minimum data required for patient registration?" The answer is always medical record number, patient name, and NIK.
03Ownership and Confidentiality
This is the single most tested concept related to medical records. You must memorize the dual ownership principle.
The Dual Ownership Rule
Aspect | Who Owns It |
|---|---|
The physical/electronic document | The healthcare facility |
The content/information within | The patient |
The ownership of the medical record document and its content carries two meanings. First, the medical record document belongs to the healthcare facility. Therefore, the facility is responsible for any loss, damage, falsification, and/or unauthorized use of the medical record document. The second meaning is that the content of the medical record belongs to the patient, and may be conveyed to close family or other parties after obtaining the patient's consent.
Because the document belongs to the facility, the facility bears liability for loss, damage, or unauthorized access. Because the content belongs to the patient, the patient has the right to access their own medical information.
Confidentiality Rules
All healthcare professionals are obligated to maintain the confidentiality of the medical record, whether in written, verbal, or electronic form. According to Permenkes No. 24/2022, all parties involved in healthcare services at a facility must maintain the confidentiality of medical record content, even after the patient has died.
The phrase "even after the patient has died" is a classic exam trap. Many students incorrectly assume confidentiality obligations end with the patient's death.
Exceptions to Confidentiality (Conditions Allowing Disclosure)
Condition | Details |
|---|---|
Patient consent | For health maintenance, treatment, curing, and care purposes |
Patient under 18 or incapacitated | Disclosure to nearest family member |
Court order | No Ministerial approval needed; provide a copy or show the original document |
Outbreak / public health emergency / disaster | Patient identity may be disclosed to authorized institutions |
Protection of individual or public safety | When there is a danger or threat to others |
Research, education, medical audit | Permitted as long as patient identity is NOT disclosed |
Insurance / cost control | Through medical audits and utilization reviews, by qualified verifiers |
Patient/family publicly discloses to mass media | Considered a waiver of confidentiality rights, giving the facility the right to respond |
Ministerial approval is required for opening medical record contents, with the exception of disclosures ordered by a court. Disclosure can be done by providing a copy of the medical record and/or displaying the original document.
For purposes of research, education, and medical audit, the authorized parties may access medical records as long as patient identity is not revealed, and all requests must be made in writing to the head of the healthcare facility.
The exam will test whether you know that court orders do not need Ministerial approval, while most other institutional requests do. Also, for research and education, the key discriminator is that patient identity must be de-identified.
04Retention Periods
This is another high-yield area. Pay attention to the difference between conventional (paper-based) and electronic records.
Retention Period Comparison Table
Conventional - Full record
Setting
Hospital (Inpatient)
Duration
Minimum 5 years
Counted From
Date of last visit or discharge
Conventional - Discharge summary + Informed consent
Setting
Hospital
Duration
Minimum 10 years
Counted From
Date the summary was created
Conventional - Full record
Setting
Non-hospital facility
Duration
Minimum 2 years
Counted From
Date of last visit
Electronic (RME)
Setting
All facilities
Duration
Minimum 25 years
Counted From
Date of last patient visit
Record Type | Setting | Duration | Counted From |
|---|---|---|---|
Conventional - Full record | Hospital (Inpatient) | Minimum 5 years | Date of last visit or discharge |
Conventional - Discharge summary + Informed consent | Hospital | Minimum 10 years | Date the summary was created |
Conventional - Full record | Non-hospital facility | Minimum 2 years | Date of last visit |
Electronic (RME) | All facilities | Minimum 25 years | Date of last patient visit |
Electronic medical record data at healthcare facilities must be stored for a minimum of 25 years from the date of the patient's last visit. After that period, the electronic medical record data may be destroyed, except for data that is still being used or utilized.
Conventional medical records for inpatients must be stored for at least 5 years from the date the patient was last treated. After 5 years, the records may be destroyed, but the discharge summary and informed consent must be retained for up to 10 years.
The most commonly tested numbers are 5 years (inpatient paper record), 10 years (discharge summary/informed consent), and 25 years (electronic). The 2-year rule for non-hospital facilities is a less common but still testable point.
After the retention period expires, records may be destroyed, not must be destroyed, and only if the data is no longer being used.
05Electronic Medical Records (RME) and SATUSEHAT
The primary purpose of Permenkes 24/2022 is to transform medical record-keeping from a paper-based (analog) format to a standardized digital format known as Electronic Medical Records (RME).
Key Features of the RME System
Feature | Explanation |
|---|---|
Mandatory adoption | All healthcare facilities must implement RME |
SATUSEHAT integration | RME must be integrated with the national health data platform managed by the Ministry of Health |
Interoperability | Systems must be able to exchange data with other electronic systems using standardized variables and metadata |
Transfer of RME | For referral purposes, RME content is transferred through the interoperability platform managed by the Ministry of Health |
Security requirements | Role-based access control, data encryption, and audit trails are required |
The operational activities of an RME system include:
Patient Registration
Distribution of Electronic Medical Record Data
Clinical Information Entry
Medical Record Information Processing
Data Input for Billing Claims
Medical Record Storage
Quality Assurance of Medical Records
Transfer of Medical Record Content
The facility must ensure: complete and clear documentation of all actions performed; security, integrity, confidentiality, and availability of data in medical records; protection of patient data and information; and compatibility of electronic systems with standardized variables and metadata set by the Ministry of Health.
Sanctions for Non-Compliance
Administrative sanctions under Pasal 41 of PMK 24/2022 are applied in stages: written warning is the first official notice from health authorities. Sanctions range from written warnings up to revocation of accreditation status for facilities that fail to adopt electronic medical records and integrate with SATUSEHAT.
06Medical Records as Legal Evidence
Medical records serve not only a clinical function but also a legal one. The exam may present vignettes involving malpractice or forensic situations where the status of medical records as evidence is tested.
Functions of Medical Records
Function | Description |
|---|---|
Administrative | Basis for facility management and organization of healthcare services |
Legal | Written evidence of healthcare provided; can be used as evidence in court |
Financial | Basis for billing and insurance claims, including BPJS claims |
Research | Data source for clinical and epidemiological research |
Education | Teaching material for medical students and residents |
Documentation | Permanent record of patient history and continuity of care |
Medical records can serve as written evidence in criminal cases, and under article 164 HIR, they can be used as written evidence in civil cases.
For medical records to be admissible as legal evidence, they must meet the following criteria:
Not written in pencil
No erasures or correction fluid (tip-ex)
Errors should be corrected by crossing out with a single line, initialed, and dated
Complete and legible
The content of medical records constitutes medical confidentiality that must be guarded. Unlawful disclosure of medical record content can subject the responsible healthcare professional to criminal, civil, and/or administrative sanctions.
07Legal Consequences of Violations
Failure to maintain medical records
Legal Basis
UU Praktik Kedokteran No. 29/2004
Consequence
Disciplinary sanctions from MKDKI (reprimand, practice license revocation, mandatory re-education)
Breach of confidentiality (criminal)
Legal Basis
Pasal 322 KUHP
Consequence
Up to 9 months imprisonment
Breach of confidentiality (civil)
Legal Basis
Pasal 1365 KUHPerdata
Consequence
Obligation to compensate for damages caused by unlawful act
Falsification of medical records
Legal Basis
KUHP (forgery articles)
Consequence
Criminal prosecution for document falsification
Breach of personal data (UU PDP)
Legal Basis
UU PDP
Consequence
Administrative fines and/or imprisonment
Failure to adopt RME
Legal Basis
Permenkes 24/2022 Pasal 41
Consequence
Graduated administrative sanctions up to accreditation revocation
Consumer protection violation
Legal Basis
UU Perlindungan Konsumen Pasal 62(1)
Consequence
Up to 5 years imprisonment or fine up to Rp 2 billion
Type of Violation | Legal Basis | Consequence |
|---|---|---|
Failure to maintain medical records | UU Praktik Kedokteran No. 29/2004 | Disciplinary sanctions from MKDKI (reprimand, practice license revocation, mandatory re-education) |
Breach of confidentiality (criminal) | Pasal 322 KUHP | Up to 9 months imprisonment |
Breach of confidentiality (civil) | Pasal 1365 KUHPerdata | Obligation to compensate for damages caused by unlawful act |
Falsification of medical records | KUHP (forgery articles) | Criminal prosecution for document falsification |
Breach of personal data (UU PDP) | UU PDP | Administrative fines and/or imprisonment |
Failure to adopt RME | Permenkes 24/2022 Pasal 41 | Graduated administrative sanctions up to accreditation revocation |
Consumer protection violation | UU Perlindungan Konsumen Pasal 62(1) | Up to 5 years imprisonment or fine up to Rp 2 billion |
Opening medical record confidentiality can subject healthcare workers to criminal, civil, and administrative sanctions. Criminally, a penalty of up to 9 months imprisonment may be imposed under Pasal 322 KUHP.
08Differential Concepts and Distractors
Informed Consent vs. Medical Record
Why It Is Similar
Both are legal documents signed by the physician and involve patient information
Key Discriminator
Informed consent is about the patient's agreement to a procedure; the medical record documents the entire care process. Informed consent is part of the medical record, not a separate entity.
Resume Medis (Medical Summary) vs. Full Medical Record
Why It Is Similar
Both contain clinical information about the patient
Key Discriminator
The medical summary is a condensed version given to the patient at discharge or for referral. The full record stays at the facility.
SATUSEHAT vs. RME
Why It Is Similar
Both are part of the digital health ecosystem
Key Discriminator
RME is the facility-level electronic record. SATUSEHAT is the national interoperability platform that connects all RME systems across Indonesia.
Document Ownership vs. Content Ownership
Why It Is Similar
Both relate to "who owns the medical record"
Key Discriminator
The document (physical/electronic file) belongs to the facility. The content (information inside) belongs to the patient. Exam vignettes will try to make you confuse these two.
5-year retention vs. 25-year retention
Why It Is Similar
Both are medical record retention periods
Key Discriminator
5 years applies to conventional (paper) inpatient records. 25 years applies to electronic medical records.
Court order disclosure vs. Research disclosure
Why It Is Similar
Both are exceptions to confidentiality
Key Discriminator
Court orders do NOT require Ministerial approval and may include patient identity. Research access DOES require that patient identity be de-identified.
Confusing Concept | Why It Is Similar | Key Discriminator |
|---|---|---|
Informed Consent vs. Medical Record | Both are legal documents signed by the physician and involve patient information | Informed consent is about the patient's agreement to a procedure; the medical record documents the entire care process. Informed consent is part of the medical record, not a separate entity. |
Resume Medis (Medical Summary) vs. Full Medical Record | Both contain clinical information about the patient | The medical summary is a condensed version given to the patient at discharge or for referral. The full record stays at the facility. |
SATUSEHAT vs. RME | Both are part of the digital health ecosystem | RME is the facility-level electronic record. SATUSEHAT is the national interoperability platform that connects all RME systems across Indonesia. |
Document Ownership vs. Content Ownership | Both relate to "who owns the medical record" | The document (physical/electronic file) belongs to the facility. The content (information inside) belongs to the patient. Exam vignettes will try to make you confuse these two. |
5-year retention vs. 25-year retention | Both are medical record retention periods | 5 years applies to conventional (paper) inpatient records. 25 years applies to electronic medical records. |
Court order disclosure vs. Research disclosure | Both are exceptions to confidentiality | Court orders do NOT require Ministerial approval and may include patient identity. Research access DOES require that patient identity be de-identified. |
09Traps and High-Yield Pearls
The most common way students lose points on medical record questions is by confusing ownership of the document with ownership of the content. The exam will present a vignette where a patient demands their "medical record file" or where a hospital administrator refuses to release information. You need to distinguish between the physical document (facility's property) and the informational content (patient's right).
Another frequent trap involves retention periods. When the vignette describes a hospital with electronic records, the answer is 25 years, not 5 years. Do not default to "5 years" if the scenario mentions digital or electronic systems.
A third trap is the confidentiality after death rule. If a vignette describes a deceased patient's family requesting the medical record, the confidentiality obligation persists. Disclosure to the family requires proper authorization and follows the same rules as for a living patient.
On disclosure questions, remember the hierarchy: patient consent is the default pathway. Court orders bypass the Ministerial approval requirement. Research and education always require de-identification of patient identity. A vignette that describes a researcher wanting medical records with patient names is always wrong.
Finally, watch for the sanctions escalation. The exam tests whether you know that penalties for breaching medical record confidentiality can be simultaneously criminal (Pasal 322 KUHP), civil (Pasal 1365 KUHPerdata), and administrative (Permenkes 24/2022). These are not mutually exclusive; a single violation can trigger all three pathways.
The core competency being tested here is your understanding that medical records are both a clinical tool and a legal instrument, governed by a layered regulatory framework that balances patient rights to information access with an equally strong obligation to protect confidentiality.