Sistem Pembayaran dan Klaim
Published on September 23, 2026
Category | Details |
|---|---|
Regulatory Framework | UU No. 40/2004 (SJSN), UU No. 24/2011 (BPJS), Perpres No. 82/2018 (as amended by Perpres 59/2024), Permenkes No. 3/2023 (Standard Tariffs) |
Administering Body | BPJS Kesehatan (single-payer national health insurer covering all Indonesian residents and foreign nationals residing >6 months) |
Two-Tier Facility System | FKTP (primary level): Puskesmas, Klinik Pratama, solo-practice physicians; FKRTL (advanced referral level): Type A/B/C/D hospitals |
Payment to FKTP | Capitation (prospective, per-registered-member, paid monthly in advance) and Non-Capitation (fee-for-service for defined procedures) |
Payment to FKRTL | INA-CBGs (prospective case-based package payment per episode) and Non-INA-CBGs (fee-for-service for defined items outside the package) |
Claims Submission Deadline | Health facilities submit claims monthly, no later than the 10th of the following month |
BPJS Payment Deadline | BPJS must reimburse within 15 working days of receiving complete claim documents |
Referral Principle | Tiered referral (rujukan berjenjang): FKTP first, then vertical referral to FKRTL when indicated |
Key Transition | KRIS (Kelas Rawat Inap Standar) replacing Class I/II/III inpatient wards under Perpres 59/2024, with phased implementation |
Keywords | Kapitasi, Non-Kapitasi, INA-CBGs, Non-INA-CBGs, FKTP, FKRTL, PCare, V-Claim/E-Klaim, rujukan berjenjang, Casemix, 144 diagnoses, KBK (Kapitasi Berbasis Kinerja), PRB (Program Rujuk Balik), KRIS |
01System Architecture and Legal Foundation
The entire payment and claims apparatus operates within the framework of Indonesia's Sistem Jaminan Sosial Nasional (SJSN), codified in UU No. 40/2004, and administered by a single public insurer, BPJS Kesehatan, established by UU No. 24/2011. The program is known as Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional (JKN). Every Indonesian citizen, as well as foreign nationals residing in Indonesia for more than six months, is obligated to enroll. BPJS Kesehatan administers healthcare coverage, while BPJamsostek manages employment-related social security benefits.
The foundational principle you must understand is the separation of payment method by facility level. The system is not one homogeneous reimbursement model. Instead, it applies fundamentally different financial incentive structures at each tier of the healthcare system. At the primary level, the dominant mechanism is prospective capitation, which rewards efficiency and prevention. At the referral level, the dominant mechanism is prospective case-based payment (INA-CBGs), which rewards standardized, protocol-driven care within a bundled tariff. This dual-track design is the single most testable structural concept in this topic.
The current governing regulation for tariff standards is Permenkes No. 3 Tahun 2023, which replaced the earlier Permenkes No. 52/2016. This regulation defines the standard tariff for healthcare services in the JKN program, covering capitation and non-capitation at FKTP, and INA-CBGs and non-INA-CBGs at FKRTL.
Contribution structure is also testable. For salaried workers, employers contribute 4% of wages (capped at IDR 480,000/month) and employees contribute 1% (capped at IDR 120,000/month), based on a maximum monthly wage of IDR 12 million for calculation purposes. For independent/non-salaried participants, contribution rates are tiered by the class of inpatient care selected (Class I, II, or III). All contributions must be paid no later than the 15th day of the following calendar month. Late payment penalties are set at 5% of the initial inpatient care cost multiplied by the number of months overdue, capped at 12 months and a maximum of IDR 30,000,000.
A major ongoing reform is the transition from the three-class inpatient ward system to a single Kelas Rawat Inap Standar (KRIS) under Perpres No. 59/2024. This regulation replaces the three hospital classes with a single standard inpatient class, and hospitals were set to meet the new room standard during 2025. However, the updated contribution rates under KRIS have not yet been announced, so existing monthly rates for non-employees and dependents remain in effect until further notice.
02Classification of Payment Methods
Capitation (Kapitasi)
Facility Level
FKTP (Puskesmas, Klinik Pratama, solo-practice doctors)
Payment Basis
Fixed amount per registered member per month, paid in advance
Direction of Payment
BPJS to FKTP
Nature
Prospective (pre-paid)
Non-Capitation (Non-Kapitasi)
Facility Level
FKTP
Payment Basis
Fee-for-service based on type and volume of defined services rendered
Direction of Payment
BPJS to FKTP (via claims)
Nature
Retrospective (post-service claims)
INA-CBGs
Facility Level
FKRTL (Hospitals)
Payment Basis
Bundled package payment per episode, grouped by diagnosis and procedure
Direction of Payment
BPJS to FKRTL (via claims)
Nature
Prospective (predetermined tariff per case group)
Non-INA-CBGs
Facility Level
FKRTL (Hospitals)
Payment Basis
Fee-for-service for defined items outside the INA-CBGs package
Direction of Payment
BPJS to FKRTL (via separate claims)
Nature
Retrospective (post-service claims)
Payment Method | Facility Level | Payment Basis | Direction of Payment | Nature |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Capitation (Kapitasi) | FKTP (Puskesmas, Klinik Pratama, solo-practice doctors) | Fixed amount per registered member per month, paid in advance | BPJS to FKTP | Prospective (pre-paid) |
Non-Capitation (Non-Kapitasi) | FKTP | Fee-for-service based on type and volume of defined services rendered | BPJS to FKTP (via claims) | Retrospective (post-service claims) |
INA-CBGs | FKRTL (Hospitals) | Bundled package payment per episode, grouped by diagnosis and procedure | BPJS to FKRTL (via claims) | Prospective (predetermined tariff per case group) |
Non-INA-CBGs | FKRTL (Hospitals) | Fee-for-service for defined items outside the INA-CBGs package | BPJS to FKRTL (via separate claims) | Retrospective (post-service claims) |
Capitation in Detail
Capitation is a fixed per-capita payment made by BPJS Kesehatan to FKTP based on the number of registered participants, without considering the type or volume of healthcare services actually delivered. This system inherently incentivizes FKTP to focus on promotif and preventif activities rather than curative services alone, because income is decoupled from patient volume.
Under Permenkes No. 3/2023, the capitation formula now incorporates risk-adjusted variables (Risk Adjusted Capitation) and facility performance. The calculation considers the participant's illness risk profile, the FKTP's performance achievement percentage, the base capitation tariff, and the number of registered participants. The base tariff varies by facility type (Puskesmas, Klinik Pratama, solo-practice physician, solo-practice dentist). Capitation rates range approximately from IDR 3,000 to IDR 6,000+ per person per month depending on the facility category and performance tier.
Performance-Based Capitation (Kapitasi Berbasis Kinerja / KBK) is a refinement introduced to tie a portion of the capitation payment to measurable outcomes. Three key performance indicators are assessed: the Contact Rate (Angka Kontak, weighted at 40%, target of 150 per mille or more), the Non-Specialist Referral Ratio (weighted at 50%, target of 2% or less), and the Controlled Prolanis Participant Ratio (weighted at 10%, target of 5% or more).
For government-owned FKTP, capitation fund utilization is regulated so that a minimum of 60% is allocated to healthcare personnel as service fees, while 40% is allocated to support operational costs for service delivery.
Non-Capitation at FKTP
Non-Capitation is a claims-based payment by BPJS Kesehatan to FKTP based on the type and volume of healthcare services delivered. Services covered under non-capitation include:
Non-Capitation Service Category | Examples |
|---|---|
Ambulance services | Emergency transport |
Maternal and neonatal care | Normal delivery, antenatal/postnatal care |
Family planning services | IUD insertion/removal, implant insertion/removal |
Health screening | Certain defined screening programs |
Primary-level inpatient care | Observation and short-stay admissions at Puskesmas with inpatient beds |
INA-CBGs at FKRTL
The INA-CBGs system is a prospective payment method where the payment amount is determined in advance before the services are provided, using the Casemix model that groups diagnoses and procedures into payment packages.
The INA-CBGs code is an alphanumeric code with four components:
1st character (letter)
Represents
Case-Mix Main Group (CMG)
Example
"G" = Nervous System diseases
2nd character (number)
Represents
Case Type: 1 = Outpatient Procedure, 2 = Inpatient Procedure, 3 = Outpatient Non-Procedure, 4 = Inpatient Non-Procedure, 5 = Special (Subacute/Chronic)
Example
"4" = Inpatient Non-Procedure
3rd-4th characters (number)
Represents
Case-Based Group (CBG) within that CMG
Example
"14" = a numbered group
Roman numeral suffix
Represents
Severity Level: I (mild), II (moderate), III (severe)
Example
"-II" = moderate severity
Code Position | Represents | Example |
|---|---|---|
1st character (letter) | Case-Mix Main Group (CMG) | "G" = Nervous System diseases |
2nd character (number) | Case Type: 1 = Outpatient Procedure, 2 = Inpatient Procedure, 3 = Outpatient Non-Procedure, 4 = Inpatient Non-Procedure, 5 = Special (Subacute/Chronic) | "4" = Inpatient Non-Procedure |
3rd-4th characters (number) | Case-Based Group (CBG) within that CMG | "14" = a numbered group |
Roman numeral suffix | Severity Level: I (mild), II (moderate), III (severe) | "-II" = moderate severity |
For example, in inpatient cancer treatment, the INA-CBGs codes consist of C-4-13-I (severity level I), C-4-13-II (severity level II), and C-4-13-III (severity level III).
The severity level is determined by secondary diagnoses (comorbidities and complications) coded using ICD-10. The more complex the secondary diagnoses, the higher the severity level, and the higher the reimbursement tariff.
INA-CBGs tariffs also vary by hospital class (Type A, B, C, D) and regional grouping. Hospitals in higher-cost regions receive higher tariffs for the same INA-CBGs code.
Non-INA-CBGs at FKRTL
Non-INA-CBGs tariffs cover several defined service items with claims submitted separately from INA-CBGs. These include:
Non-INA-CBGs Item | Description |
|---|---|
Medical aids/assistive devices (alat bantu kesehatan) | Prosthetics, orthotics, hearing aids |
Chemotherapy drugs | Claimed separately from the base INA-CBGs package |
Chronic disease medications (via PRB) | Medications dispensed through the Back-Referral Program |
CAPD supplies | Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis consumables |
Organ transplantation (expanded coverage) | Kidney, liver, pancreas, lung transplant |
PET Scan | Positron Emission Tomography |
03Claims Workflow and Documentation
1. Patient registration
Action
Verify BPJS membership, register visit
Responsible Party
FKTP or FKRTL front office
System/Application
PCare (FKTP) or SIMRS (FKRTL)
2. Clinical service delivery
Action
Diagnosis, treatment, documentation
Responsible Party
Treating physician
System/Application
Medical record
3. Medical resume/discharge summary
Action
Completed with primary and secondary diagnoses, procedures performed
Responsible Party
Treating physician
System/Application
Medical record
4. Diagnosis and procedure coding
Action
Translate clinical documentation into ICD-10 (diagnoses) and ICD-9-CM (procedures)
Responsible Party
Medical coder (Casemix team)
System/Application
INA-CBGs Grouper software
5. Grouper processing
Action
Software assigns INA-CBGs code, severity level, and tariff
Responsible Party
Casemix team
System/Application
INA-CBGs application (currently version 6.x)
6. Internal verification
Action
Hospital verifier checks coding accuracy, administrative completeness
Responsible Party
Hospital's internal verification unit
System/Application
SIMRS, V-Claim/E-Klaim
7. Claims submission to BPJS
Action
Digital submission of bundled claim files
Responsible Party
Hospital claims/assurance unit
System/Application
V-Claim/E-Klaim platform
8. BPJS verification
Action
BPJS verifier reviews claims, may return as "pending" if issues found
Responsible Party
BPJS branch office verifier
System/Application
BPJS verification system
9. Payment
Action
Approved claims are paid to the facility
Responsible Party
BPJS Kesehatan
System/Application
Bank transfer
Step | Action | Responsible Party | System/Application |
|---|---|---|---|
1. Patient registration | Verify BPJS membership, register visit | FKTP or FKRTL front office | PCare (FKTP) or SIMRS (FKRTL) |
2. Clinical service delivery | Diagnosis, treatment, documentation | Treating physician | Medical record |
3. Medical resume/discharge summary | Completed with primary and secondary diagnoses, procedures performed | Treating physician | Medical record |
4. Diagnosis and procedure coding | Translate clinical documentation into ICD-10 (diagnoses) and ICD-9-CM (procedures) | Medical coder (Casemix team) | INA-CBGs Grouper software |
5. Grouper processing | Software assigns INA-CBGs code, severity level, and tariff | Casemix team | INA-CBGs application (currently version 6.x) |
6. Internal verification | Hospital verifier checks coding accuracy, administrative completeness | Hospital's internal verification unit | SIMRS, V-Claim/E-Klaim |
7. Claims submission to BPJS | Digital submission of bundled claim files | Hospital claims/assurance unit | V-Claim/E-Klaim platform |
8. BPJS verification | BPJS verifier reviews claims, may return as "pending" if issues found | BPJS branch office verifier | BPJS verification system |
9. Payment | Approved claims are paid to the facility | BPJS Kesehatan | Bank transfer |
For FKTP (capitation): There is no episode-by-episode claims submission for capitation services. Capitation is paid in advance and has the potential to cause undertreatment if not managed with performance standards. Non-capitation services at FKTP do require claims. FKTP must use the PCare (Primary Care) application for recording all patient encounters.
For FKRTL (INA-CBGs): Health facilities submit claims every month, no later than the 10th of the following month. BPJS Kesehatan is required to pay the health facilities for services provided to participants no later than 15 working days from the time complete claim documents are received.
The accuracy of the claims process hinges on clinical documentation quality. The medical information in the medical summary assists coders in accurately coding diagnoses according to ICD-10. The accuracy of diagnosis codes significantly affects the quality of health cost payments under the casemix system. This is the single most important concept linking clinical practice to financial outcomes in the Indonesian system.
Common Causes of Pending or Rejected Claims
Among pending inpatient claims studied in a recent analysis, administrative factors accounted for 46%, medical factors for 37%, and coding-related factors for 17%.
Factor Category | Common Issues |
|---|---|
Administrative | Incomplete patient identity data, expired referral letters, missing eligibility verification, BPJS membership status inactive, mismatch between registered FKTP and referring FKTP |
Medical/Clinical | Incomplete or illegible medical resume, missing documentation of procedures or comorbidities, clinical indication not supporting the coded diagnosis |
Coding | Incorrect primary diagnosis code, missing or inaccurate secondary diagnosis codes (affecting severity level), procedure codes not matching the documented intervention, ICD-10/ICD-9-CM coding errors |
When claims are revised after pending status, changes can occur in the Case Main Group, Severity Level (often downgraded), and the resulting reimbursement amount. In one study, nine claims showed changes in INA-CBGs reimbursement with a net decrease of IDR 19,378,800 (26.74%) compared with pre-revision values.
04Referral System and Service Flow
The Tiered Referral System (Rujukan Berjenjang)
The referral system is not merely a logistical pathway but a cost-containment mechanism that is central to how the JKN controls expenditure. On the exam, understanding the gatekeeper role of FKTP is essential.
Vertical referral (upward)
Direction
FKTP to FKRTL
Definition
From lower-level facility to higher-level facility when the case exceeds the competence of the primary level
Vertical referral (downward)
Direction
FKRTL to FKTP
Definition
Back-referral for continued management of stabilized chronic disease patients (Program Rujuk Balik / PRB)
Horizontal referral
Direction
Within the same level
Definition
Transfer between facilities of equal tier due to limitations in equipment, capacity, or personnel
Referral Type | Direction | Definition |
|---|---|---|
Vertical referral (upward) | FKTP to FKRTL | From lower-level facility to higher-level facility when the case exceeds the competence of the primary level |
Vertical referral (downward) | FKRTL to FKTP | Back-referral for continued management of stabilized chronic disease patients (Program Rujuk Balik / PRB) |
Horizontal referral | Within the same level | Transfer between facilities of equal tier due to limitations in equipment, capacity, or personnel |
Patients must first visit their registered FKTP. The FKTP physician performs a clinical assessment and determines whether the case can be managed at the primary level or must be referred to FKRTL. A referral letter is valid for 3 months (90 days) and covers a single visit to the FKRTL.
Exceptions to the tiered referral requirement:
Patients in emergency conditions can be taken directly to any FKRTL without going through FKTP first. Patients with certain chronic diseases or those in geographically difficult areas may also be referred directly.
FKTP is expected to fully manage 144 diagnoses as defined in Permenkes No. 514/2015. The non-specialist referral ratio is one of the KBK performance indicators, and FKTP that refer too many cases that should be handled at the primary level (target: referral ratio below 2%) will have their capitation payment adjusted downward.
Program Rujuk Balik (PRB)
The Back-Referral Program is designed for patients with chronic conditions (such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, heart disease, asthma, COPD, epilepsy, schizophrenia, SLE, and stroke) who have been stabilized at the hospital level. Once the specialist determines the patient's condition is controlled, the patient is referred back to FKTP for ongoing medication and monitoring. Chronic medications under PRB are claimed separately as Non-INA-CBGs items.
05Common Exam Confusions
Capitation vs. Non-Capitation
Why Students Get Confused
Both are paid to FKTP, so students assume they work the same way
Key Discriminator
Capitation is prospective (fixed per-member, paid before service). Non-Capitation is retrospective (claims-based, paid after service for defined procedures like deliveries, family planning, ambulance).
INA-CBGs vs. Non-INA-CBGs
Why Students Get Confused
Both are paid to FKRTL (hospitals), and students think all hospital services are bundled
Key Discriminator
INA-CBGs is the bundled package per diagnosis episode. Non-INA-CBGs covers defined items billed separately (chemotherapy drugs, assistive devices, CAPD, PET Scan, organ transplant).
Capitation vs. INA-CBGs
Why Students Get Confused
Students mix up which payment model goes to which facility level
Key Discriminator
Capitation = FKTP only. INA-CBGs = FKRTL only. Never the reverse.
Prospective vs. Retrospective Payment
Why Students Get Confused
Students confuse "predetermined tariff" with "post-service billing"
Key Discriminator
Prospective: tariff is set before the service is delivered (capitation, INA-CBGs). Retrospective: payment is based on the actual services rendered after the fact (non-capitation, non-INA-CBGs, and traditional fee-for-service).
FKTP vs. FKRTL
Why Students Get Confused
Students confuse the scope of services
Key Discriminator
FKTP provides non-specialist primary care (144 defined diagnoses). FKRTL provides specialist and sub-specialist care.
Vertical vs. Horizontal Referral
Why Students Get Confused
Both involve transferring patients
Key Discriminator
Vertical = between different levels (FKTP to FKRTL or vice versa). Horizontal = within the same level (one Puskesmas to another, or one hospital to another of the same class).
KBK indicators
Why Students Get Confused
Students forget which indicator has which weight
Key Discriminator
Contact Rate (40%), Non-Specialist Referral Ratio (50%), Prolanis Controlled Ratio (10%). The referral ratio carries the highest weight.
KRIS vs. Class I/II/III
Why Students Get Confused
Students apply old class system rules to questions set after the transition
Key Discriminator
KRIS is a single standard inpatient class replacing the three-tier system. Contribution rates under KRIS have not yet been finalized; old rates still apply during the transition period.
Confusion Point | Why Students Get Confused | Key Discriminator |
|---|---|---|
Capitation vs. Non-Capitation | Both are paid to FKTP, so students assume they work the same way | Capitation is prospective (fixed per-member, paid before service). Non-Capitation is retrospective (claims-based, paid after service for defined procedures like deliveries, family planning, ambulance). |
INA-CBGs vs. Non-INA-CBGs | Both are paid to FKRTL (hospitals), and students think all hospital services are bundled | INA-CBGs is the bundled package per diagnosis episode. Non-INA-CBGs covers defined items billed separately (chemotherapy drugs, assistive devices, CAPD, PET Scan, organ transplant). |
Capitation vs. INA-CBGs | Students mix up which payment model goes to which facility level | Capitation = FKTP only. INA-CBGs = FKRTL only. Never the reverse. |
Prospective vs. Retrospective Payment | Students confuse "predetermined tariff" with "post-service billing" | Prospective: tariff is set before the service is delivered (capitation, INA-CBGs). Retrospective: payment is based on the actual services rendered after the fact (non-capitation, non-INA-CBGs, and traditional fee-for-service). |
FKTP vs. FKRTL | Students confuse the scope of services | FKTP provides non-specialist primary care (144 defined diagnoses). FKRTL provides specialist and sub-specialist care. |
Vertical vs. Horizontal Referral | Both involve transferring patients | Vertical = between different levels (FKTP to FKRTL or vice versa). Horizontal = within the same level (one Puskesmas to another, or one hospital to another of the same class). |
KBK indicators | Students forget which indicator has which weight | Contact Rate (40%), Non-Specialist Referral Ratio (50%), Prolanis Controlled Ratio (10%). The referral ratio carries the highest weight. |
KRIS vs. Class I/II/III | Students apply old class system rules to questions set after the transition | KRIS is a single standard inpatient class replacing the three-tier system. Contribution rates under KRIS have not yet been finalized; old rates still apply during the transition period. |
06Traps and High-Yield Pearls
The most common trap in this topic is confusing the payment mechanism with the facility level. When a vignette describes a patient at a Puskesmas, the payment method is capitation (or non-capitation for defined procedures). When the vignette describes a patient admitted to a hospital, the payment method is INA-CBGs. Students who select "INA-CBGs" for a primary care scenario, or "capitation" for a hospital admission, will lose the point immediately.
A second common error involves the claims timeline. Facilities must submit claims by the 10th of the following month, and BPJS must pay within 15 working days of receiving complete documents. Confusing these two deadlines, or not knowing that capitation requires no episodic claims submission (it is paid automatically based on registered membership), is a frequent mistake.
The third trap relates to coding and severity levels in INA-CBGs. Students must understand that the reimbursement a hospital receives is not determined by the actual cost of care, but by the INA-CBGs code generated from the diagnosis and procedure coding. If the clinical documentation is incomplete and secondary diagnoses are not recorded, the severity level will be lower, and the hospital will receive a smaller payment. This is why accurate ICD-10 coding is not just an administrative task but a direct determinant of hospital revenue.
Finally, watch for questions testing the gatekeeper function of FKTP. The 144 diagnoses that must be fully managed at the primary level, the non-specialist referral ratio as a performance metric, and the consequences of excessive referrals on capitation payment are all fair game. The core competency being tested here is whether you understand that the payment system is deliberately designed to keep patients at the lowest appropriate level of care, and that financial incentives (capitation adjustment, KBK performance scoring) reinforce this design.